Free Answer - District Court of Federal Claims - federal


File Size: 68.9 kB
Pages: 21
Date: August 23, 2005
File Format: PDF
State: federal
Category: District
Author: unknown
Word Count: 4,180 Words, 26,610 Characters
Page Size: Letter (8 1/2" x 11")
URL

https://www.findforms.com/pdf_files/cofc/19949/9.pdf

Download Answer - District Court of Federal Claims ( 68.9 kB)


Preview Answer - District Court of Federal Claims
Case 1:05-cv-00547-LAS

Document 9

Filed 08/23/2005

Page 1 of 21

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF FEDERAL CLAIMS GOVERNMENT TELECOMMUNICATIONS, INC., Plaintiff, v. THE UNITED STATES, Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) No. 05-547C ) (Senior Judge Smith) ) ) )

DEFENDANT'S ANSWER For its answer to plaintiff's complaint, defendant admits, denies, and alleges as follows: 1. The allegation contained in the first sentence of

paragraph one is a conclusion of law, to which no response is required; to the extent it may be deemed an allegation of fact, it is denied. The allegation contained in the second sentence of

paragraph one is plaintiff's characterization of its case, to which no response is required; to the extent it may be deemed an allegation of fact, it is denied. 2. The allegation contained in paragraph two is a

conclusion of law and plaintiff's characterization of its case, to which no response is required; to the extent it may be deemed an allegation of fact, it is denied. 3. Denies the allegation contained in the first sentence of

paragraph three, for lack of knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as to its truth. Admits the allegations

contained in the second sentence of paragraph three to the extent supported by the contracts cited, which are the best evidence of

Case 1:05-cv-00547-LAS

Document 9

Filed 08/23/2005

Page 2 of 21

their contents; otherwise denies the allegations contained in the second sentence of paragraph three. Denies the allegations

contained in the third, fourth and fifth sentences of paragraph three for lack of knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as to their truth. 4. The allegation contained in paragraph four is

plaintiff's characterization of its case, to which no response is required; to the extent it may be deemed an allegation of fact, defendant admits that the United States is the defendant in this action. 5. The allegations contained in the first sentence of

paragraph five are plaintiff's characterization of its case, to which no response is required; to the extent they may be deemed allegations of fact, they are denied. The allegations contained

in the second and third sentences of paragraph five are plaintiff's characterization of its case, to which no response is required; to the extent they may be deemed allegations of fact, they are denied. 6. The allegation contained in paragraph six is plaintiff's

characterization of its case, to which no response is required; to the extent it may be deemed an allegation of fact, it is denied. 7. Admits the allegation contained in the first sentence of

paragraph seven to the extent supported by the request for

2

Case 1:05-cv-00547-LAS

Document 9

Filed 08/23/2005

Page 3 of 21

proposal ("RFP") and statement of work ("SOW") cited, which are the best evidence of their contents; otherwise denies the allegations contained in the first sentence of paragraph seven. Admits the allegations contained in the second and third sentences of paragraph seven. The allegation contained in the

fourth sentence of paragraph seven is a conclusion of law, to which no response is required; to the extent it may be deemed an allegation of fact, it is denied. Admits the allegation

contained in the fifth sentence of paragraph seven. 8. Admits the allegations contained in paragraph eight to

the extent supported by the SOW cited, which is the best evidence of its contents; otherwise denies the allegations contained in paragraph eight. 9. 10. 11. Admits. Denies. Admits the allegations contained in paragraph 11 to the

extent supported by the contract cited, which is the best evidence of its contents; otherwise denies the allegations contained in paragraph 11. 12. Denies the allegations contained in paragraph 12 for

lack of knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as to their truth. 13. Denies the allegations contained in paragraph 13 for

lack of knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as

3

Case 1:05-cv-00547-LAS

Document 9

Filed 08/23/2005

Page 4 of 21

to their truth. 14. Denies the allegations contained in paragraph 14 for

lack of knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as to their truth. 15. Denies the allegation contained in paragraph 15 that

"[t]he MPI project reflected all the hallmarks of a project that would stand to benefit from tasking the prime contractor with Program Management responsibilities" for lack of knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as to its truth; admits the remainder of the allegations contained in paragraph 15 to the extent supported by the contract, which is the best evidence of its contents; otherwise denies the remainder of the allegations contained in paragraph 15. 16. Denies the allegations contained in paragraph 16 for

lack of knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as to their truth. 17. Admits the allegations contained in the first and

second sentences of paragraph 17 to the extent supported by the technical proposal cited, which is the best evidence of its contents; otherwise denies the allegations contained in the first and second sentences of paragraph 17. Denies the allegations

contained in the third sentence of paragraph 17 for lack of knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as to their truth.

4

Case 1:05-cv-00547-LAS

Document 9

Filed 08/23/2005

Page 5 of 21

18.

Admits the allegations contained in paragraph 18 to the

extent supported by plaintiff's technical proposal, which is the best evidence of its contents; otherwise denies the allegations contained in paragraph 18. 19. Admits the allegations contained in the first sentence

of paragraph 19 to the extent supported by plaintiff's technical proposal, which is the best evidence of its contents; otherwise denies the allegations contained in the first sentence of paragraph 19. The allegations contained in the second sentence

of paragraph 19 are plaintiff's characterization of its case, to which no response is required; to the extent they may be deemed allegations of fact, they are denied. 20. Admits the allegation contained in paragraph 20 that

the Postal Service "contemplated that all necessary Program Management and Project Management activities . . . would be included under the Program Management CLIN" to the extent supported by the contract, which is the best evidence of its contents; otherwise denies this allegation; denies the remaining allegations contained in paragraph 20 for lack of knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as to their truth. 21. Admits the allegations contained in paragraph 21 to the

extent supported by the parties' contract, which is the best evidence of what they contemplated by the term "Program/Onsite Project Management;" otherwise denies the allegations contained

5

Case 1:05-cv-00547-LAS

Document 9

Filed 08/23/2005

Page 6 of 21

in paragraph 21. 22. Admits the allegations contained in paragraph 22 to the

extent supported by the contract cited, which is the best evidence of its contents; otherwise denies the allegations contained in paragraph 22. 23. The allegations contained in the first sentence of

paragraph 23 are plaintiff's characterization of its case, to which no response is required; to the extent they may be deemed allegations of fact, they are denied. Admits the allegations

contained in the second and third sentences of paragraph 23 to the extent supported by the schedules cited, which are the best evidence of their contents; otherwise denies the allegations contained in the second and third sentences of paragraph 23. 24. Denies the allegation contained in the first sentence

of paragraph 24 for lack of knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as to its truth. Admits the allegations

contained in the second and third sentences of paragraph 24 to the extent supported by the technical proposal cited, which is the best evidence of its contents; otherwise denies the allegations contained in the second and third sentences of paragraph 24. 25. Admits the allegations contained in paragraph 25 to the

extent supported by plaintiff's technical proposal, which is the best evidence of its contents; otherwise denies the allegations

6

Case 1:05-cv-00547-LAS

Document 9

Filed 08/23/2005

Page 7 of 21

contained in paragraph 25. 26. Admits the allegations contained in paragraph 26 to the

extent supported by the technical proposal cited, which is the best evidence of its contents; otherwise denies the allegations contained in paragraph 26. 27. Admits the allegations contained in paragraph 27 to the

extent supported by the technical proposal cited, which is the best evidence of its contents; otherwise denies the allegations contained in paragraph 27. 28. Admits the allegations contained in paragraph 28 to the

extent supported by the technical proposal and SOW cited, which are the best evidence of their contents; otherwise denies the allegations contained in paragraph 28. 29. Denies the allegations contained in paragraph 29 for

lack of knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as to their truth. 30. Denies the allegations contained in the first and Denies the allegations

second sentences of paragraph 30.

contained in the third sentence of paragraph 30 for lack of knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as to their truth. 31. Denies the allegations contained in the first sentence Admits the allegations contained in the second

of paragraph 31.

sentence of paragraph 31 to the extent supported by the contract

7

Case 1:05-cv-00547-LAS

Document 9

Filed 08/23/2005

Page 8 of 21

delivery schedule, which is the best evidence of its contents; otherwise denies the allegations contained in the second sentence of paragraph 31. Admits the allegation contained in the third

sentence of paragraph 31 to the extent supported by the estimates cited, which are the best evidence of their contents; otherwise denies the allegation contained in the third sentence of paragraph 31 for lack of knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as to its truth. 32. Admits the allegation contained in the first sentence

of paragraph 32 to the extent supported by the estimates and invoices cited, which are the best evidence of their contents; otherwise denies the allegation contained in the first sentence of paragraph 32 for lack of knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as to its truth. Denies the allegations

contained in the second sentence of paragraph 32. 33. Denies the allegation contained in the first sentence Admits the allegations contained in the second

of paragraph 33.

sentence of paragraph 33 to the extent supported by the contract, which is the best evidence of contractual payment requirements; otherwise denies the allegations contained in the second sentence of paragraph 33. Denies the allegations contained in the third

sentence of paragraph 33 for lack of knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as to their truth.

8

Case 1:05-cv-00547-LAS

Document 9

Filed 08/23/2005

Page 9 of 21

34.

Denies the allegation contained in the first sentence Admits the allegations contained in the second

of paragraph 34.

sentence of paragraph 34 to the extent supported by the invoices any other documents cited, which are the best evidence of their contents; otherwise denies the allegations contained in the second sentence of paragraph 34. Denies the allegations

contained in the third and fourth sentences of paragraph 34. 35. Admits the allegations contained in paragraph 35 to the

extent supported by the document cited, which is the best evidence of its contents; otherwise denies the allegations contained in paragraph 35. 36. 37. Denies. The allegation contained in the first sentence of

paragraph 37 that "GTI on March 8, 2005 re-filed the REA as a claim under the CDA and formally requested a contracting officer's final decision thereon" is a conclusion of law, to which no response is required; to the extent it may be deemed an allegation of fact, it is denied; denies the remainder of the allegations contained in the first sentence of paragraph 37 for lack of knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as to their truth. The allegations contained in the second and

third sentences of paragraph 37 are conclusions of law, to which no response is required; to the extent they may be deemed allegations of fact, they are denied.

9

Case 1:05-cv-00547-LAS

Document 9

Filed 08/23/2005

Page 10 of 21

38.

Admits the allegations contained in paragraph 38 to the

extent supported by the solicitation and amendment cited, which are the best evidence of their contents; otherwise denies the allegations contained in paragraph 38. 39. Admits the allegations contained in paragraph 39 to the

extent supported by the proposal cited, which is the best evidence of its contents; otherwise denies the allegations contained in paragraph 39. 40. Admits the allegations contained in paragraph 40 to the

extent supported by the contract cited, which is the best evidence of its contents; otherwise denies the allegations contained in paragraph 40. 41. Admits the allegations contained in paragraph 41 to the

extent supported by the contract cited, which is the best evidence of its contents; otherwise denies the allegations contained in paragraph 41. 42. Admits the allegations contained in paragraph 42 to the

extent supported by the modifications cited, which are the best evidence of their contents; otherwise denies the allegations contained in paragraph 42.

43.

Admits the allegations contained in paragraph 43 to the

extent supported by the modification and schedules cited, which

10

Case 1:05-cv-00547-LAS

Document 9

Filed 08/23/2005

Page 11 of 21

are the best evidence of their contents; otherwise denies the allegations contained in paragraph 43. 44. Admits the allegation contained in the first sentence Admits the allegations contained in the second

of paragraph 44.

sentence of paragraph 44 to the extent supported by the correspondence cited, which is the best evidence of its contents; otherwise denies the allegations contained in the second sentence of paragraph 44. 45. The allegation contained in paragraph 45 is a

conclusion of law, to which no response is required; to the extent it may be deemed an allegation of fact, it is denied. 46. 47. Denies. The allegations contained in paragraph 47 are

conclusions of law, to which no response is required; to the extent they may be deemed allegations of fact, they are denied. 48. Defendant's responses to paragraphs 1 through 47 of the

complaint are incorporated by reference. 49. Admits the allegations contained in paragraph 49 to the

extent supported by the contract cited, which is the best evidence of its contents; otherwise denies the allegations contained in paragraph 49. 50. Admits the allegations contained in paragraph 50 to the

extent supported by the contract cited, which is the best evidence of its contents; otherwise denies the allegations

11

Case 1:05-cv-00547-LAS

Document 9

Filed 08/23/2005

Page 12 of 21

contained in paragraph 50. 51. The allegations contained in the first sentence of

paragraph 51 are conclusions of law, to which no response is required; to the extent they may be deemed allegations of fact, they are denied. Denies the allegations contained in the second

sentence of paragraph 51. 52. The allegations contained in the first and second

sentences of paragraph 52 are conclusions of law, to which no response is required; to the extent they may be deemed allegations of fact, they are denied. Admits the allegations

contained in the third and fourth sentences of paragraph 52 to the extent supported by the parties' contract, which is the best evidence of the proper Program Management CLIN charges; otherwise denies the allegations contained in the third and fourth sentences of paragraph 52. 53. Denies the allegations contained in the first, second, Admits the allegation

and third sentences of paragraph 53.

contained in the fourth sentence of paragraph 53 to the extent supported by the documents cited, which are the best evidence of their contents; otherwise denies the allegation contained in the fourth sentence of paragraph 53. Denies the allegations

contained in the fifth sentence of paragraph 53. 54. Admits the allegation contained in the first sentence Denies the allegations contained in the second

of paragraph 54.

12

Case 1:05-cv-00547-LAS

Document 9

Filed 08/23/2005

Page 13 of 21

sentence of paragraph 54. 55. The allegations contained in paragraph 55 are

conclusions of law, to which no response is required; to the extent they may be deemed allegations of fact, they are denied. Denies that plaintiff is entitled to the relief requested in its prayer for relief following paragraph 55 or to any relief whatsoever. Defendant's responses to paragraphs 1 through 55 of the complaint are incorporated by reference. 56. Denies the allegations contained in paragraph 56 for

lack of knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as to their truth. 57. Denies the allegations contained in paragraph 57 for

lack of knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as to their truth. 58. Admits the allegations contained in the first and

second sentences of paragraph 58 to the extent supported by the contract cited, which is the best evidence of its contents; otherwise denies the allegations contained in the first and second sentences of paragraph 58. Denies the allegations

contained in the third sentence of paragraph 58 for lack of knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as to their truth.

13

Case 1:05-cv-00547-LAS

Document 9

Filed 08/23/2005

Page 14 of 21

59.

Denies the allegations contained in the first and

second sentences of paragraph 59 for lack of knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as to their truth. Denies the allegation contained in the third sentence of paragraph 59 that "GTI was entitled to make this assumption" for lack of knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as to its truth; the remaining allegation contained in the third sentence of paragraph 59 is a conclusion of law, to which no response is required; to the extent it may be deemed an allegation of fact, it is denied. 60. Denies the allegations contained in the first and

second sentences of paragraph 60 for lack of knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as to their truth. Denies the allegation contained in the third sentence of paragraph 60 that the Postal Service administered the contract in a way that was not in accordance with the contract terms; denies the remaining allegation contained in the third sentence of paragraph 60 for lack of knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as to its truth. 61. 62. Denies. Admits the allegations contained in paragraph 62 to the

extent supported by the contract, which is the best evidence of its contents; otherwise denies the allegations contained in paragraph 62.

14

Case 1:05-cv-00547-LAS

Document 9

Filed 08/23/2005

Page 15 of 21

63.

Denies the allegations contained in the first sentence Admits the allegations contained in the second

of paragraph 63.

and third sentences of paragraph 63 to the extent supported by the contract cited, which is the best evidence of its contents; otherwise denies the allegations contained in the second and third sentences of paragraph 63. 64. Denies the allegations contained in the first and

second sentences of paragraph 64 for lack of knowledge of information sufficient to form a belief as to their truth. Denies the allegations contained in the third sentence of paragraph 64. 65. 66. Denies. Denies the allegations contained in the first, second, The allegation contained in

and third sentences of paragraph 66.

the fourth sentence of paragraph 66 is plaintiff's characterization of its case, to which no response is required; to the extent it may be deemed an allegation of fact, it is denied. 67. Admits the allegations contained in the first sentence Denies the allegation contained in the second

of paragraph 67.

sentence of paragraph 67. 68. The allegations contained in paragraph 68 are

conclusions of law, to which no response is required; to the extent they may be deemed allegations of fact, they are denied.

15

Case 1:05-cv-00547-LAS

Document 9

Filed 08/23/2005

Page 16 of 21

Denies that plaintiff is entitled to the relief requested in its prayer for relief following paragraph 68 or to any relief whatsoever. 69. Defendant's responses to paragraphs 1 through 68 of the

complaint are incorporated by reference. 70. The allegations contained in paragraph 70 are

conclusions of law, to which no response is required; to the extent they may be deemed allegations of fact, they are denied. 71. 72. 73. Denies. Denies. The allegations contained in paragraph 73 are

conclusions of law, to which no response is required; to the extent they may be deemed allegations of fact, they are denied. Denies that plaintiff is entitled to the relief requested in its prayer for relief following paragraph 73 or to any relief whatsoever. 74. Defendant's responses to paragraphs 1 through 73 of the

complaint are incorporated by reference. 75. The allegations contained in paragraph 75 are

conclusions of law, to which no response is required; to the extent they may be deemed allegations of fact, they are denied. 76. 77. Denies. Denies.

16

Case 1:05-cv-00547-LAS

Document 9

Filed 08/23/2005

Page 17 of 21

78.

The allegations contained in paragraph 78 are

conclusions of law, to which no response is required; to the extent they may be deemed allegations of fact, they are denied. Denies that plaintiff is entitled to the relief requested in its prayer for relief following paragraph 78 or to any relief whatsoever. 79. Defendant's responses to paragraphs 1 through 78 of the

complaint are incorporated by reference. 80. The allegations contained in paragraph 80 are

conclusions of law, to which no response is required; to the extent they may be deemed allegations of fact, they are denied. 81. The allegations contained in paragraph 81 are

conclusions of law, to which no response is required; to the extent they may be deemed allegations of fact, they are denied. 82. The allegations contained in paragraph 82 are

conclusions of law, to which no response is required; to the extent they may be deemed allegations of fact, they are denied. 83. The allegations contained in paragraph 83 are

conclusions of law, to which no response is required; to the extent they may be deemed allegations of fact, they are denied. 84. The allegations contained in paragraph 84 are

conclusions of law, to which no response is required; to the extent they may be deemed allegations of fact, they are denied.

17

Case 1:05-cv-00547-LAS

Document 9

Filed 08/23/2005

Page 18 of 21

85.

The allegations contained in paragraph 85 are

conclusions of law, to which no response is required; to the extent they may be deemed allegations of fact, they are denied. 86. The allegations contained in paragraph 86 are

conclusions of law, to which no response is required; to the extent they may be deemed allegations of fact, they are denied. 87. Denies the allegation contained in the first sentence Admits the allegations contained in the second

of paragraph 87.

and third sentences of paragraph 87 to the extent supported by the modification and contract cited, which are the best evidence of their contents; otherwise denies the allegations contained in the second and third sentences of paragraph 87. Denies the

allegation contained in the fourth sentence of paragraph 87. 88. 89. Denies. The allegations contained in the first, second, and

third sentences of paragraph 89 are conclusions of law, to which no response is required; to the extent they may be deemed allegations of fact, the are denied. Denies the allegation

contained in the fourth sentence of paragraph 89. 90. Denies the allegations contained in the first and The allegation contained in

second sentences of paragraph 90.

the third sentence of paragraph 90 is plaintiff's characterization of its case, to which no response is required; to the extent it may be deemed an allegation of fact, it is

18

Case 1:05-cv-00547-LAS

Document 9

Filed 08/23/2005

Page 19 of 21

denied. 91. Admits the allegation contained in the first sentence Denies the allegation contained in the second

of paragraph 91.

sentence of paragraph 91. 92. The allegations contained in paragraph 92 are

conclusions of law, to which no response is required; to the extent they may be deemed allegations of fact, they are denied. Denies that plaintiff is entitled to the relief requested in its prayer for relief following paragraph 92 or to any relief whatsoever. 93. Defendant's responses to paragraphs 1 through 92 of the

complaint are incorporated by reference. 94. 95. 96. 97. Denies. Denies. Denies. The allegations contained in paragraph 97 are

conclusions of law, to which no response is required; to the extent they may be deemed allegations of fact, they are denied. 98. Denies that plaintiff is entitled to the relief

requested in its prayer for relief following paragraph 97 or to any relief whatsoever. 99. Denies each and every allegation not previously

admitted or otherwise qualified.

19

Case 1:05-cv-00547-LAS

Document 9

Filed 08/23/2005

Page 20 of 21

WHEREFORE, defendant requests that the Court enter judgment in its favor, order that the complaint be dismissed, and grant defendant such other and further relief as the Court may deem just and proper. Respectfully submitted, PETER D. KEISLER Assistant Attorney General DAVID M. COHEN Director s/ Harold D. Lester, Jr. HAROLD D. LESTER, JR. Assistant Director s/ Lauren S. Moore OF COUNSEL: RENEE C. MACRI Attorney United States Postal Service Law Department LAUREN S. MOORE Attorney Commercial Litigation Branch Civil Division Department of Justice 1100 L Street, N.W. Attn: Classification Unit 8th Floor Washington, D.C. 20530 Tele: (202) 307-6288 Fax: (202) 514-8640 Attorneys for Defendant AUGUST 23, 2005

20

Case 1:05-cv-00547-LAS

Document 9

Filed 08/23/2005

Page 21 of 21

CERTIFICATE OF FILING I hereby certify that on the 23rd day of AUGUST, 2005, a copy of the foregoing "DEFENDANT'S ANSWER" was filed electronically. I understand that notice of this filing will be

sent to all parties by operation of the Court's electronic filing system. system. /s/ Lauren S. Moore Parties may access this filing through the Court's