Case 1:05-cv-00592-LAS
Document 9
Filed 09/15/2005
Page 1 of 15
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF FEDERAL CLAIMS GOVERNMENT TELECOMMUNICATIONS, INC., Plaintiff, v. THE UNITED STATES, Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) No. 05-592C ) (Senior Judge Smith) ) ) )
DEFENDANT'S ANSWER For its answer to plaintiff's complaint, defendant admits, denies, and alleges as follows: 1. The allegation contained in the first sentence of
paragraph one is a conclusion of law, to which no response is required; to the extent it may be deemed an allegation of fact, it is denied. The allegation contained in the second sentence of
paragraph one is plaintiff's characterization of its case, to which no response is required; to the extent it may be deemed an allegation of fact, it is denied. 2. The allegation contained in paragraph two is a
conclusion of law and plaintiff's characterization of its case, to which no response is required; to the extent it may be deemed an allegation of fact, it is denied. 3. Denies the allegation contained in the first sentence of
paragraph three, for lack of knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as to its truth. Admits the allegations
contained in the second sentence of paragraph three to the extent supported by the contracts cited, which are the best evidence of
Case 1:05-cv-00592-LAS
Document 9
Filed 09/15/2005
Page 2 of 15
their contents; otherwise denies the allegations contained in the second sentence of paragraph three. Denies the allegations
contained in the third, fourth and fifth sentences of paragraph three for lack of knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as to their truth. 4. The allegation contained in paragraph four is
plaintiff's characterization of its case, to which no response is required; to the extent it may be deemed an allegation of fact, defendant admits that the United States is the defendant in this action. 5. The allegations contained in the first sentence of
paragraph five are plaintiff's characterization of its case, to which no response is required; to the extent they may be deemed allegations of fact, they are denied. Denies the allegations
contained in the second, third, and fourth sentences of paragraph five. Denies the allegations contained in the fifth and sixth
sentences of paragraph five for lack of knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as to their truth. Denies the
allegations contained in the seventh sentence of paragraph five. Admits the allegation contained in the eighth sentence of paragraph five that the USPS represented to plaintiff that it would discuss contractual adjustments following contract award; denies the remainder of the allegations contained in the eighth sentence of paragraph five. The allegation contained in the
2
Case 1:05-cv-00592-LAS
Document 9
Filed 09/15/2005
Page 3 of 15
ninth sentence of paragraph five is a conclusion of law, to which no response is required; to the extent it may be deemed an allegation of fact, it is denied. The allegation contained in
the tenth sentence of paragraph five is plaintiff's characterization of its case, to which no response is required; to the extent it may be deemed an allegation of fact, it is denied. 6. The allegation contained in paragraph six is plaintiff's
characterization of its case, to which no response is required; to the extent it may be deemed an allegation of fact, it is admitted to the extent supported by the complaints in the actions cited, which are the best evidence of whether the actions are related; otherwise denies the allegation contained in paragraph six. 7. Admits the allegations contained in paragraph seven to
the extent supported by the request for proposal ("RFP") and statement of work ("SOW") cited, which are the best evidence of their contents; otherwise denies the allegations contained in paragraph seven. 8. Admits the allegations contained in the first sentence
of paragraph eight to the extent supported by the proposals cited, which are the best evidence of their contents; otherwise denies the allegations contained in the first sentence of paragraph eight. Admits the allegations contained in the second
3
Case 1:05-cv-00592-LAS
Document 9
Filed 09/15/2005
Page 4 of 15
and third sentences of paragraph eight. 9. 10. Denies. Defendant admits the allegation contained in the first
sentence of paragraph 10 that the parties met prior to contract award on June 6, 2003; denies the remainder of the allegations contained in the first sentence of paragraph 10. Admits the
allegations contained in the second sentence of paragraph 10 to the extent supported by the checklist cited, which is the best evidence of its contents; otherwise denies the allegations contained in the second sentence of paragraph 10. 11. Defendant admits the allegation contained in the first
sentence of paragraph 11 that the USPS represented to plaintiff that it would discuss contractual adjustments following contract award; denies the remainder of the allegations contained in the first sentence of paragraph 11. Denies the allegations contained
in the second sentence of paragraph 11. 12. Admits the allegation contained in the first sentence
of paragraph 12 to the extent that in common English usage, the phrase "Merrifield-like complexity" means a level of complexity similar to the USPS site in Merrifield, Virginia; denies the remaining allegations contained in the first sentence of paragraph 12. Denies the allegations contained in the second
sentence of paragraph 12. 13. Admits.
4
Case 1:05-cv-00592-LAS
Document 9
Filed 09/15/2005
Page 5 of 15
14.
Admits the allegations contained in the first sentence Denies the allegations contained in the second
of paragraph 14.
sentence of paragraph 14 for lack of knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as to their truth. 15. 16. Admits. Denies the allegation contained in the first sentence
of paragraph 16 that the USPS made a "directive" to plaintiff; denies the remaining allegation contained in the first sentence of paragraph 16 for lack of knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as to its truth. Denies the allegations
contained in the second sentence of paragraph 16 for lack of knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as to their truth. Admits the allegation contained in the third sentence of
paragraph 16 that plaintiff attempted to re-negotiate aspects of the contract; denies the remainder of the allegations contained in the third sentence of paragraph 16. 17. Denies the allegations contained in paragraph 17 for
lack of knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as to their truth. 18. Denies the allegations contained in paragraph 18 for
lack of knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as to their truth.
5
Case 1:05-cv-00592-LAS
Document 9
Filed 09/15/2005
Page 6 of 15
19.
Denies the allegations contained in paragraph 19 for
lack of knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as to their truth. 20. Denies the allegations contained in paragraph 20 for
lack of knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as to their truth. 21. Denies the allegations contained in paragraph 21 for
lack of knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as to their truth. 22. Denies the allegations contained in paragraph 22 for
lack of knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as to their truth. 23. Denies the allegations contained in paragraph 23 for
lack of knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as to their truth. 24. Denies the allegations contained in paragraph 24 for
lack of knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as to their truth. 25. Denies the allegations contained in paragraph 25 for
lack of knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as to their truth. 26. Denies the allegations contained in the first and
second sentences of paragraph 26 for lack of knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as to their truth.
6
Case 1:05-cv-00592-LAS
Document 9
Filed 09/15/2005
Page 7 of 15
Denies the allegation contained in the third sentence of paragraph 26. 27. Denies the allegation contained in the first sentence
of paragraph 27 for lack of knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as to its truth. Denies the allegation
contained in the second sentence of paragraph 27 that the USPS adopted the complexity "scorecard" cited; denies the remainder of the allegations contained in the second sentence of paragraph 27 for lack of knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as to their truth. Denies the allegations contained in the third
and fourth sentences of paragraph 27 for lack of knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as to their truth. 28. Denies the allegations contained in paragraph 28 for
lack of knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as to their truth. 29. Denies the allegations contained in paragraph 29 for
lack of knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as to their truth. 30. Admits the allegation contained in paragraph 30 to the
extent supported by the document cited, which is the best evidence of its contents; otherwise denies the allegation contained in paragraph 30. 31. Denies.
7
Case 1:05-cv-00592-LAS
Document 9
Filed 09/15/2005
Page 8 of 15
32.
The allegations contained in the first sentence of
paragraph 32 are conclusions of law, to which no response is required; to the extent they may be deemed allegations of fact, they are admitted to the extent supported by the document cited, which is the best evidence of its contents; otherwise denies the allegations contained in the first sentence of paragraph 32. allegations contained in the second and third sentences of paragraph 32 are conclusions of law, to which no response is required; to the extent they may be deemed allegations of fact, they are admitted. 33. Defendant's responses to paragraphs 1 through 32 of the The
complaint are incorporated by reference. 34. The allegation contained in the first sentence of
paragraph 34 is a conclusions of law, to which no response is required; to the extent it may be deemed an allegation of fact, it is denied. Denies the allegation contained in the second
sentence of paragraph 34. 35. The allegations contained in paragraph 35 are
conclusions of law, to which no response is required; to the extent they may be deemed allegations of fact, they are denied. 36. Admits the allegation contained in paragraph 36 that
the USPS represented to plaintiff that it would discuss contractual adjustments following contract award; denies the remainder of the allegations contained in paragraph 36.
8
Case 1:05-cv-00592-LAS
Document 9
Filed 09/15/2005
Page 9 of 15
37.
Denies the allegations contained in the first sentence
of paragraph 37 for lack of knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as to their truth. Admits the allegation
contained in the second sentence of paragraph 37 that plaintiff attempted to re-negotiate aspects of the contract; denies the remainder of the allegations contained in the second sentence of paragraph 37. 38. The allegations contained in paragraph 38 are
conclusions of law, to which no response is required; to the extent they may be deemed allegations of fact, they are denied. 39. Admits the allegation contained in the first sentence
of paragraph 39 that the Postal Service has not paid plaintiff monies in response to its alleged request for adjustment and claim; the remainder of the allegations contained in the first sentence of paragraph 39 are conclusions of law, to which no response is required; to the extent they may be deemed allegations of fact, they are denied. Denies the allegations
contained in the second sentence of paragraph 39. 40. The allegations contained in paragraph 40 are
conclusions of law, to which no response is required; to the extent they may be deemed allegations of fact, they are denied. Denies that plaintiff is entitled to the relief requested in its prayer for relief following paragraph 40 or to any relief whatsoever.
9
Case 1:05-cv-00592-LAS
Document 9
Filed 09/15/2005
Page 10 of 15
41.
Defendant's responses to paragraphs 1 through 40 of the
complaint are incorporated by reference. 42. 43. Denies. The allegations contained in paragraph 43 are
conclusions of law, to which no response is required; to the extent they may be deemed allegations of fact, they are denied. 44. Denies the allegations contained in the first sentence Denies the allegations contained in the second
of paragraph 44.
sentence of paragraph 44 for lack of knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as to their truth. 45. 46. Denies. Admits the allegation contained in the first sentence
of paragraph 46 that the Postal Service has not paid plaintiff monies in response to its alleged request for adjustment and claim; the remainder of the allegations contained in the first sentence of paragraph 46 are conclusions of law, to which no response is required; to the extent they may be deemed allegations of fact, they are denied. Denies the allegation
contained in the second sentence of paragraph 46. 47. The allegations contained in paragraph 47 are
conclusions of law, to which no response is required; to the extent they may be deemed allegations of fact, they are denied.
10
Case 1:05-cv-00592-LAS
Document 9
Filed 09/15/2005
Page 11 of 15
Denies that plaintiff is entitled to the relief requested in its prayer for relief following paragraph 47 or to any relief whatsoever. 48. Defendant's responses to paragraphs 1 through 47 of the
complaint are incorporated by reference. 49. Admits the allegation contained in paragraph 49 that
the USPS represented to plaintiff that it would discuss contractual adjustments following contract award; denies the remainder of the allegations contained in paragraph 49. 50. Denies the allegations contained in the first sentence
of paragraph 50 for lack of knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as to their truth. Admits the allegation
contained in the second sentence of paragraph 50 that plaintiff attempted to re-negotiate aspects of the contract; denies the remainder of the allegations contained in the second sentence of paragraph 50. 51. 52. Denies. Admits the allegation contained in the first sentence
of paragraph 52 that the Postal Service has not paid plaintiff monies in response to its alleged request for adjustment and claim; the remainder of the allegations contained in the first sentence of paragraph 52 are conclusions of law, to which no response is required; to the extent they may be deemed allegations of fact, they are denied. Denies the allegation
11
Case 1:05-cv-00592-LAS
Document 9
Filed 09/15/2005
Page 12 of 15
contained in the second sentence of paragraph 52. 53. The allegations contained in paragraph 53 are
conclusions of law, to which no response is required; to the extent they may be deemed allegations of fact, they are denied. Denies that plaintiff is entitled to the relief requested in its prayer for relief following paragraph 53 or to any relief whatsoever. 54. Defendant's responses to paragraphs 1 through 53 of the
complaint are incorporated by reference. 55. 56. 57. 58. Denies. Denies. Denies. The allegations contained in paragraph 58 are
conclusions of law, to which no response is required; to the extent they may be deemed allegations of fact, they are denied. Denies that plaintiff is entitled to the relief requested in its prayer for relief following paragraph 58 or to any relief whatsoever. 59. Defendant's responses to paragraphs 1 through 58 of the
complaint are incorporated by reference. 60. 61. 62. Denies. Denies. Denies.
12
Case 1:05-cv-00592-LAS
Document 9
Filed 09/15/2005
Page 13 of 15
63.
The allegations contained in paragraph 63 are
conclusions of law, to which no response is required; to the extent they may be deemed allegations of fact, they are denied. Denies that plaintiff is entitled to the relief requested in its prayer for relief following paragraph 63 or to any relief whatsoever. 64. Defendant's responses to paragraphs 1 through 63 of the
complaint are incorporated by reference. 65. 66. 67. 68. Denies. Denies. Denies. The allegations contained in paragraph 68 are
conclusions of law, to which no response is required; to the extent they may be deemed allegations of fact, they are denied. Denies that plaintiff is entitled to the relief requested in its prayer for relief following paragraph 68 or to any relief whatsoever. 69. Denies each and every allegation not previously
admitted or otherwise qualified. WHEREFORE, defendant requests that the Court enter judgment in its favor, order that the complaint be dismissed, and grant defendant such other and further relief as the Court may deem just and proper.
13
Case 1:05-cv-00592-LAS
Document 9
Filed 09/15/2005
Page 14 of 15
Respectfully submitted, PETER D. KEISLER Assistant Attorney General DAVID M. COHEN Director s/ Harold D. Lester, Jr. HAROLD D. LESTER, JR. Assistant Director s/ Lauren S. Moore OF COUNSEL: RENEE C. MACRI Attorney United States Postal Service Law Department LAUREN S. MOORE Attorney Commercial Litigation Branch Civil Division Department of Justice 1100 L Street, N.W. Attn: Classification Unit 8th Floor Washington, D.C. 20530 Tele: (202) 307-6288 Fax: (202) 514-8640 Attorneys for Defendant SEPTEMBER 15, 2005
14
Case 1:05-cv-00592-LAS
Document 9
Filed 09/15/2005
Page 15 of 15
CERTIFICATE OF FILING I hereby certify that on the 15th day of SEPTEMBER, 2005, a copy of the foregoing "DEFENDANT'S ANSWER" was filed electronically. I understand that notice of this filing will be
sent to all parties by operation of the Court's electronic filing system. system. /s/ Lauren S. Moore Parties may access this filing through the Court's