Free Motion for Extension of Time - District Court of Federal Claims - federal


File Size: 15.8 kB
Pages: 4
Date: May 22, 2008
File Format: PDF
State: federal
Category: District
Author: unknown
Word Count: 649 Words, 3,932 Characters
Page Size: Letter (8 1/2" x 11")
URL

https://www.findforms.com/pdf_files/cofc/20181/52.pdf

Download Motion for Extension of Time - District Court of Federal Claims ( 15.8 kB)


Preview Motion for Extension of Time - District Court of Federal Claims
Case 1:05-cv-00708-CFL

Document 52

Filed 05/22/2008

Page 1 of 4

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF FEDERAL CLAIMS SCOTT TIMBER CO., Plaintiff, v. THE UNITED STATES, ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case No. 05-708C (Judge Lettow)

Defendant.

DEFENDANT'S OPPOSED MOTION FOR AN ENLARGEMENT OF TIME Pursuant to Rules 6(b) and 6.1 of the Rules of the United States Court of Federal Claims ("RCFC"), defendant, the United States, respectfully requests a 5-day enlargement of time, to and including June 11, 2008, to file its motion in limine; defendant also respectfully requests a 9day enlargement of time, to and including June 11, 2008, to file it response to plaintiff's motion for an order submitting certain deposition transcripts, accompanying deposition exhibits and answers to interrogatories as party admissions. Our motion in limine is currently due on June 6, 2008, and our response to plaintiff's motion is currently due on June 2, 2007. This is defendant's first request for an enlargement of time for this purpose. Defendant's counsel has consulted with plaintiff's counsel regarding this enlargement of time; plaintiff's counsel has stated that he opposes this motion. This enlargement is requested owing to the demands of other matters for which Government counsel are responsible. Ms. Stentiford is responsible for preparing the trial brief in this case, due on May 30, 2008; preparing a motion for judgment upon the administrative record in American Ordnance v. United States, Fed. Cl. No. 08-238C, also due on May 30, 2008; and taking and defending depositions the week of June 2, 2008 in American Ordnance v. United

Case 1:05-cv-00708-CFL

Document 52

Filed 05/22/2008

Page 2 of 4

States, Fed. Cl. No. 07-867C. Ms. Lynch is responsible for drafting an appellate brief in Lensing v. OPM, Fed. Cir. No. 07-3267, due on May 28, 2008; and for taking and defending depositions the week of June 2, 2008 in Channell et al. v. United States, Fed. Cl. No. 07-338C. In both American Ordnance, Fed. Cl. No. 07-867C and Channell Fed. Cl. No. 07-338C, the discovery period closes on June 6, 2008, which is also the deadline in the instant case for filing motions in limine. For the foregoing reasons, defendant respectfully requests that the Court grant its motion for an enlargement of time of five (5) days, to and including June 11, 2008, within which to file defendant's motion in limine. Defendant also respectfully requests that the Court grant its motion for an enlargement of time of nine (9) days, to and including June 11, 2008, within which to file its response to plaintiff's motion for an order submitting certain deposition transcripts, accompanying deposition exhibits and answers to interrogatories as party admissions. Respectfully submitted, GREGORY G. KATSAS Acting Assistant Attorney General JEANNE E. DAVIDSON Director

BRYANT G. SNEE Deputy Director

2

Case 1:05-cv-00708-CFL

Document 52

Filed 05/22/2008

Page 3 of 4

/s/ Joan M. Stentiford JOAN M. STENTIFORD Trial Attorney Commercial Litigation Branch Civil Division U.S. Department of Justice Attn: Classification Unit 1100 L Street, N.W., 8th Floor Washington, D.C. 20530 Tel: (202) 616-0341 Fax: (202) 514-8624

May 22, 2008

/s/ Ellen M. Lynch ELLEN M. LYNCH Trial Attorney Commercial Litigation Branch Civil Division U.S. Department of Justice Attn: Classification Unit 1100 L Street, N.W., 8th Floor Washington, D.C. 20530 Tel: (202) 353-7994 Fax: (202) 514-8624 Attorneys for Defendant

3

Case 1:05-cv-00708-CFL

Document 52

Filed 05/22/2008

Page 4 of 4

CERTIFICATE OF FILING I hereby certify that on this 22nd day of May, 2008, a copy of "Defendant's Opposed Motion For An Enlargement Of Time" was filed electronically. I understand that notice of this filing will be sent to all parties by operation of the Court's electronic filing system. Parties may access this filing through the Court's system.

/s/ Joan M. Stentiford Joan M. Stentiford