Free Objection to Exhibit List - District Court of Federal Claims - federal

Case 1:05-cv-00956-CCM

Document 75

Filed 04/05/2007

Page 1 of 3

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF FEDERAL CLAIMS DAVID S. LITMAN and MALIA A. LITMAN, ) ) ) Plaintiffs-Counterdefendants, ) ) V. ) ) THE UNITED STATES, ) ) Defendant-Counterplaintiff. ) _________________________________________________________ ) ROBERT B. DIENER ) and MICHELLE S. DIENER, ) ) Plaintiffs-Counterdefendants, ) ) V. ) ) THE UNITED STATES, ) ) Defendant-Counterplaintiff. ) _________________________________________________________ ) HOTELS.COM, INC. and Subsidiaries (f/k/a ) HOTEL RESERVATIONS NETWORK, INC.), ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) V. ) ) THE UNITED STATES, ) ) Defendant. )

No. 05-956T

No. 05-971T

No. 06-285T (Judge Christine O.C. Miller)

PLAINTIFFS-COUNTERDEFENDANTS, DAVID S. LITMAN, MALIA A. LITMAN, ROBERT B. DIENER, AND MICHELLE S. DIENER'S OBJECTIONS TO THE UNITED STATES' EXHIBIT LIST Plaintiffs-Counterdefendants, David S. Litman, Malia A. Litman, Robert B. Diener, and Michelle S. Diener file these Objections to the United States' Exhibit List (these "Objections") pursuant to ¶ 14(a)(3) of Appendix A of the Rules of the Court of Federal Claims

HOU01:1021930.1

Case 1:05-cv-00956-CCM

Document 75

Filed 04/05/2007

Page 2 of 3

(the "Rules") and the Court's Order dated February 22, 2007. Plaintiffs make the following Objections to Exhibits on the United States' Exhibit List for the reasons stated: Exhibit No. 191 -- Plaintiffs object to this document on the grounds that it is irrelevant (F.R.E. 402, 403). Exhibit No. 24 -- Plaintiffs object to this document on the grounds that it is irrelevant (F.R.E. 402, 403). Exhibit No. 27 -- Plaintiffs object to this document on the grounds that it is irrelevant (F.R.E. 402, 403) and lacks foundation (F.R.E. 901). The proposed exhibit relates to a valuation date (October 13, 2000) that is eight months after the February 24, 2000 valuation date at issue in this case. Exhibit No. 50 -- Plaintiffs object to this document on the grounds that it is irrelevant (F.R.E. 402, 403) and lacks foundation (F.R.E. 901). The proposed exhibit relates to a valuation date (October 13, 2000) that is eight months after the February 24, 2000 valuation date at issue in this case. Exhibit No. 51 Plaintiffs object to this document on the grounds that it is irrelevant (F.R.E. 402, 403) and lacks foundation (F.R.E. 901). The proposed exhibit relates to a valuation date (October 13, 2000) that is eight months after the February 24, 2000 valuation date at issue in this case.

1

Exhibit numbers are those provided in the United States' Exhibit List. Plaintiffs reserve the right to object to any such proposed exhibit at trial on the grounds that a proper foundation has not been laid.

HOU01:1021930.1

2

Case 1:05-cv-00956-CCM

Document 75

Filed 04/05/2007

Page 3 of 3

WHEREFORE, for the foregoing reasons, Plaintiffs respectfully request these Objections be sustained. Respectfully submitted, BAKER BOTTS L.L.P. Dated: April 5, 2007 By: John W. Porter John W. Porter Attorney of Record 3000 One Shell Plaza 910 Louisiana Houston, Texas 77002 (713) 229-1597 (713) 229-1522 (FAX) Stephanie Loomis-Price (Of Counsel) J. Graham Kenney (Of Counsel) COUNSEL FOR PLAINTIFFSCOUNTERDEFENDANTS

HOU01:1021930.1

3