Free Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply - District Court of Federal Claims - federal


File Size: 13.9 kB
Pages: 2
Date: December 18, 2007
File Format: PDF
State: federal
Category: District
Author: unknown
Word Count: 314 Words, 2,073 Characters
Page Size: Letter (8 1/2" x 11")
URL

https://www.findforms.com/pdf_files/cofc/20716/44.pdf

Download Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply - District Court of Federal Claims ( 13.9 kB)


Preview Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply - District Court of Federal Claims
Case 1:05-cv-01223-FMA

Document 44

Filed 12/18/2007

Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF FEDERAL CLAIMS

No. 05-1223 T (Judge Francis M. Allegra) CLEARMEADOW INVESTMENTS, LLC & CLEARMEADOW CAPITAL CORP., TAX MATTERS PARTNER, Plaintiff, v. THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Defendant

PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR AN ENLARGEMENT OF TIME IN WHICH TO FILE A REPLY TO DEFENDANT'S BRIEF IN RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFF'S CROSS MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND IN REPLY TO PLAINTIFF'S RESPONSE TO DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

Pursuant to RCFC 6(b) and 6.1, Plaintiff, Clearmeadow Investments, LLC, Clearmeadow Capital Corp., Tax Matters Partner, asks the Court for a thirty (30) day enlargement of time, from December 24, 2007 through January 23, 2008, inclusive, within which to file its Reply to Defendant's Defendants Brief in Response to Plaintiff's Cross Motion for Summary Judgement and in Reply to Plaintiff's Response to Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment. This is the first enlargement Plaintiff has sought for this purpose. The Plaintiff's attorney has discussed this motion with the Defendant's attorney, who stated that he will not object to its allowance. As good cause for this motion, Plaintiff states the following: 1. Given the upcoming holidays, and Plaintiff's attorney's end of year scheduling

conflicts, Plaintiff's attorney is requesting an additional thirty (30) days to adequately Reply to Defendant's Response.

Case 1:05-cv-01223-FMA

Document 44

Filed 12/18/2007

Page 2 of 2

2.

Because of Defendant's response to Plaintiff's Cross-Motion for Summary

Judgment and Reply to Plaintiffs' Response to Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment require careful review and response, Plaintiff's attorney is requesting an enlargement of time for an additional thirty (30) days. WHEREFORE the Plaintiff requests that the Court grant this motion. Respectfully submitted,

Date: December 18, 2007

/s/: Thomas C. Pliske Thomas C. Pliske Attorney at Law 16 Bridle Spur Court St. Charles, MO 63303-4400 314-795-7800 telephone 314-872-7374 facsimile

2