Free Motion for Extension of Time - District Court of Federal Claims - federal


File Size: 16.5 kB
Pages: 4
Date: July 6, 2007
File Format: PDF
State: federal
Category: District
Author: unknown
Word Count: 482 Words, 3,069 Characters
Page Size: Letter (8 1/2" x 11")
URL

https://www.findforms.com/pdf_files/cofc/21257/23.pdf

Download Motion for Extension of Time - District Court of Federal Claims ( 16.5 kB)


Preview Motion for Extension of Time - District Court of Federal Claims
Case 1:06-cv-00345-EGB

Document 23

Filed 07/06/2007

Page 1 of 4

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF FEDERAL CLAIMS GRACE AND NAEEM UDDIN, INC., Plaintiff, v. THE UNITED STATES, Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

No. 06-345C (Senior Judge Bruggink)

DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR AN EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF'S FIRST REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS Defendant respectfully requests an extension of time of 30 days, to and including August 13, 2007, within which to respond to plaintiff's first request for production of documents that is currently due on July 13, 2007. This is defendant's first request for an extension of time for this purpose. Defendant has attempted to contact plaintiff's counsel, but has not been able to ascertain whether plaintiff will object to this extension. In its request of June 13, 2007, plaintiff seeks nearly two years' worth of documents relating to events that occurred after it was terminated for default and involving third-parties that were not involved previously. Additionally, because the request encompasses both printed and electronic documents, the agency requires more time to gather, review and properly catalog the documents sought by plaintiff. Defendant's lead counsel will also be on active military duty when the

Case 1:06-cv-00345-EGB

Document 23

Filed 07/06/2007

Page 2 of 4

current production would become due on July 13, 2007. Currently pending before the Court is our motion to dismiss and our motion to stay discovery pending the decision in that motion. The Court has directed a telephonic conference with the parties on July 17, 2007. Because the requested discovery will become due prior to that hearing, we respectfully request this extension. For these reasons, defendant respectfully requests that the Court grant its motion for a 30-day extension of time within which to respond to plaintiff's first request for production. Respectfully submitted, PETER D. KEISLER Assistant Attorney General JEANNE E. DAVIDSON Director

/s/ Franklin E. White, Jr. FRANKLIN E. WHITE, JR. Assistant Director

2

Case 1:06-cv-00345-EGB

Document 23

Filed 07/06/2007

Page 3 of 4

OF COUNSEL: MARK G. GARRETT United States Department of Agriculture Attorney-Advisor 14th and Independence Avenue, S.W. Washington, D.C. 20250-1415 /s/ Armando A. Rodriguez-Feo ARMANDO A. RODRIGUEZ-FEO Trial Attorney Commercial Litigation Branch Civil Division Department of Justice Attn: Classification Unit 8th Floor, 1100 L Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20530 Tel: (202) 307-3390 Fax: (202) 514-8624 Attorneys for Defendant July 6, 2007

3

Case 1:06-cv-00345-EGB

Document 23

Filed 07/06/2007

Page 4 of 4

CERTIFICATE OF FILING I hereby certify that on July 6, 2007, a copy of the foregoing "DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR AN EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF'S FIRST REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION" was filed electronically. I understand that notice of this filing will be sent to all parties by operation of the Court's electronic filing system. Parties may access this filing through the Court's system. /s/Armando Rodriguez-Feo