Free Proposed Findings of Uncontroverted Fact - District Court of Federal Claims - federal

Case 1:02-cv-00796-FMA

Document 32

Filed 04/29/2004

Page 1 of 8

No. 02-796C (Judge Allegra) ______________________________________________________________________________ IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF FEDERAL CLAIMS INFORMATION SYSTEMS & NETWORKS CORPORATION, Plaintiff, v. THE UNITED STATES, Defendant. ______________________________________________________________________________ DEFENDANT'S PROPOSED FINDINGS OF UNCONTROVERTED FACTS ______________________________________________________________________________

PETER D. KEISLER Assistant Attorney General DAVID M. COHEN Director BRIAN M. SIMKIN Assistant Director BRENT M. McBURNEY Trial Attorney Commercial Litigation Branch Civil Division Department of Justice 1100 L Street, Room 12074 Washington, D.C. 20530 Tele: (202) 307-0277 April 29, 2004 Attorneys for Defendant

Case 1:02-cv-00796-FMA

Document 32

Filed 04/29/2004

Page 2 of 8

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF FEDERAL CLAIMS INFORMATION SYSTEMS & NETWORKS CORPORATION, Plaintiff, v. THE UNITED STATES, Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

No. 02-796C (Judge Allegra)

DEFENDANT'S PROPOSED FINDINGS OF UNCONTROVERTED FACT Pursuant to Rule 56(h)(2) of the Rules for the United States Court of Federal Claims, defendant proposes its findings of uncontroverted fact. Contracts 1. On July 15, 1994, the Government, through the Department of the Navy, awarded

Contract No. N00600-94-C-0389 ("contract 0389"), to plaintiff Information Systems And Networks Corporation ("ISN"). Def. App. 1.1 The ultimate customer was the Navy's Space and Naval Warfare Systems Command ("SPAWAR"). Id. The contract required ISN to provide all material, labor, and services to engineer, install, and test an automated technical control system ("ATC") for three Naval turnkey facilities located at the switching centers at Hampton Roads, Virginia, Pearl Harbor, Hawaii, and Camp Smith, Hawaii. Def. App. 9. The contract was for a firm fixed price of $4,416,645.54. Def. App. 3. The contract also contained four options to provide the same system at several other installations around the world. Def. App. 3-7.

1

Def. App. ___ refers to pages from the appendix attached to this filing. 2

Case 1:02-cv-00796-FMA

Document 32

Filed 04/29/2004

Page 3 of 8

2.

Section G.4(a) of contract 0389 states, in relevant part: (3) When in the opinion of the contractor, the COTR requests effort outside the existing scope of the contract, the contractor will promptly notify the PCO in writing. (4) No action will be taken by the contractor under such technical instruction unless the PCO or ACO has issued a contractual change.

Def. App. 23. 3. On March 28, 1995, ISN formally executed a subcontract agreement with

Datacomm Management Sciences ("Datacomm"). Def. App. 35. In accordance with the agreement Datacomm was to provide ISN with the supplies and software ISN required for completion of the contract. Def. App. 36. ISN agreed to pay Datacomm a firm fixed price for each item ISN ordered. Id. The Engineering Change Proposal 4. Almost from the beginning of contract performance, ISN was behind schedule.

ISN was late in delivering contract data requirements lists ("CDRL"), as well as behind the overall installation for all three sites. Def. App. 49-53. While there were many reasons for ISN falling behind schedule, chief among them was the fact that ISN had initially understaffed the contract with temporary hires and that ISN did not understand the magnitude of the project. Id. Indeed, the problems required ISN to replace its program manager just a few months into the start of the project. Id. 5. The contract called for ISN to modernize the existing switching equipment in the

turnkey facilities. The communications configuration at the Hampton Roads facility however, 3

Case 1:02-cv-00796-FMA

Document 32

Filed 04/29/2004

Page 4 of 8

was continually changing. Complaint ¶ 6. On June 20, 1995 to address ISN's performance problems and the changing configuration, ISN submitted an Engineering Change Proposal ("ECP"). Complaint ¶ 7. 6. In a June 26, 1995 letter, The Navy contract specialist, Lisa Murtha, wrote to ISN

that: "[a] formal modification to the contract will be issued for the combination of both the formal acceptance of an ECP for implementation of all sites in Lot I and the revised delivery schedule for all sites in Lot I." Def. App. 54; Pl. Ex. 6. That letter further indicated that the ECP "will be reviewed by SPAWAR with comments" to be provided. Id. In addition, the letter indicated that ISN was required to provide a delivery schedule for all sites in Lot I. Id. 7. On July 20, 1995, Jeff Bergdahl, the contracting officer's technical representative

sent a facsimile to Roscoe Crawford, the contracting officer, that included a memorandum from SPAWAR to FISC. The memorandum indicated in paragraph 1 that SPAWAR reviewed the ECP and "technically approves ISN's proposed engineering changes," but recommended that all terms be negotiated. Pl. Ex. 7. In paragraph 2, the memorandum addressed ISN's cost analysis, recommending, among other things, a further cost breakdown of the additional charges. Id. 8. Contracting officer Roscoe Crawford testified that discussions that he had with

Mr. Bergdahl indicated that SPAWAR viewed the ECP's costs as unreasonably priced. Def. App. 122. In addition, Mr. Crawford testified that ISN never provided a revised installation cutover schedule as requested by Ms. Murtha's June 26, 1995 letter. Def. App. 123. 9. On August 23, 1995, an ISN employee, in an internal ISN memorandum,

explained to Mr. Robertson that:

4

Case 1:02-cv-00796-FMA

Document 32

Filed 04/29/2004

Page 5 of 8

PER FONCON WITH LISA MURTHA, 22 Aug 95: 1) She has not looked at the ECP, to date. 2) Due to end of year procurements(8a-2 each) She will not be able to work on our ECP until Mid-Sept 95. *** 5) I talked with Don Tabasco about contract and FAR requirements for Timely ECP processing by the government. He recommends that we take a more forceful approach with the contracting officer. You might want to touch base with him personally. *** If you decide to talk with Roscoe, please give me a heads up so I can do the same to Lisa? Def. App. 55. Additionally, ISN included in its submitted progress reports for September through December 1995, that the June ECP had not been approved. Def. App. 56-70. On January 26, 1996, Mr. Don Tabasco, ISN's manager of contracts, wrote to the Government to complain about the fact that ISN had not received approval of the June 20, 1995 ECP. Def. App. 71. Funding 10. On August, 31, 1995, Jeffery Bergdahl, the contracting officer's technical

representative informed ISN that the ECP was "technically" approved. Pl. Ex. 7. Further, Mr. Bergdahl acknowledged that additional funds would have to be added to the contract to accommodate the ECP. Id. 11. On August 23, 1995, just one week prior to the writing of the above

memorandum, SPAWAR, had reprogrammed $789,319 from another contract to partially fund the ECP. Def. App. 74. On November 27, 1995, the reprogrammed funds were withdrawn from

5

Case 1:02-cv-00796-FMA

Document 32

Filed 04/29/2004

Page 6 of 8

contract 0389 due to an emergent requirement. Def. App. 75. The reprogrammed funds represent the only monies added to contract 0389. As of November 27, 1995, there was no money added to contract 0389 to fund the ECP. 12. In addition, Mr. Bergdahl also specifically stated that the "agreed configuration"

that had been proposed by ISN and technically approved by SPAWAR, "obviously was never set forth in the contract." Def. App. 131. 13. Meeting notes from a December 6, 1995 meeting between Roscoe Crawford and

SPAWAR representatives indicate that Mr. Crawford "never modified the contract to re-establish the deliv. schedule on any of the sites because he could never get a good idea of what a realistic new deliv. schedule would be. Also the contractor would not agree to pay consideration to extend the schedule. So right now we are in limbo." Def. App. 116; compare Pl. Ex. 11. 14. ISN's program manager testified that ISN was aware that without a formal

modification of the contract, ISN could not start work on the ECP. Def. App. 119. Mr. Robertson also testified that ISN was aware that the Government did not possess funding for the ECP, and that without such funding, the ECP could not be approved. Def. App. 120. Termination 15. On February 20, 1996, the Government issued a stop work order to ISN. Def.

App. 76. This was preliminary to the Government terminating ISN's contract for the convenience of the Government. On February 23, 1996, the Government took possession of all of the Government inventory retained by ISN. Id. The contract was formally terminated for the convenience of the Government on March 15, 1996. Def. App. 77. At the time of the termination, ISN had partially completed only the installation at the Hampton Roads Virginia 6

Case 1:02-cv-00796-FMA

Document 32

Filed 04/29/2004

Page 7 of 8

site. ISN did not even start the installation at the two Hawaii sites. Id. 16. Pursuant to Part 49 of the Federal Acquisition Regulations (FAR), ISN, on June 6,

1996, submitted a termination settlement proposal ("proposal"). Def. App. 82-90. ISN sought payment of $5,060,578 on a $4,416,646 contract in which ISN had only performed work on a third of the contract requirements. The proposed amount included $443,396 in profit. Id. ISN also stated that it had spent $2,401,080 for materials. Id. There was no discussion about any outstanding payments due to ISN's subcontractor, Datacomm. In fact, according to a request letter from Datacomm, ISN still owes Datacomm $196,688.68 plus interest for materials Datacomm furnished to ISN pursuant to their subcontract agreement. Def. App. 91. 17. On December 19, 1996, the Defense Contract Audit Agency ("DCAA") issued

audit Report No. 6311-97B17100001. Def. App. 92. At the request of the termination contracting officer, DCAA had conducted an audit of ISN's settlement proposal. Id. The auditor concluded that he could support a $4,049,532 settlement with ISN. Def. App. 95. The auditor questioned $1,011,047 of ISN's $5,060,578 proposal. In particular, all of the claimed profit was questioned. Def. App. 93. The disallowance was due in part to a previous audit of ISN's request for progress payments 3-5. Def. App. 102-109. The earlier audit had concluded that ISN was in loss position on contract 0389. Def. App. 103. Previous Proceeding 18. On October 3, 2001, this Court, Judge James Turner presiding, issued a bench

ruling to the effect that there was no settlement agreement between ISN and the Government. Def. App. 110-114. That ruling was subsequently affirmed by the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit on October 16, 2002. Def. App. 115. 7

Case 1:02-cv-00796-FMA

Document 32

Filed 04/29/2004

Page 8 of 8

Respectfully submitted, PETER D. KEISLER Assistant Attorney General DAVID M. COHEN Director s/ Brian M. Simkin BRIAN M. SIMKIN Assistant Director s/ Brent M. McBurney BRENT M. McBURNEY Trial Attorney Commercial Litigation Branch Civil Division Department of Justice 1100 L Street, Room 12074 Washington, D.C. 20530 Tele: (202) 307-0277 April 29, 2004 Attorneys for Defendant

8

Case 1:02-cv-00796-FMA

Document 32-2

Filed 04/29/2004

Page 1 of 3

No. 02-796C (Judge Allegra) ______________________________________________________________________________ IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF FEDERAL CLAIMS INFORMATION SYSTEMS & NETWORKS CORPORATION, Plaintiff, v. THE UNITED STATES, Defendant. ______________________________________________________________________________ APPENDIX OF EXHIBITS SUPPORTING DEFENDANT'S CROSS-MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT ______________________________________________________________________________

PETER D. KEISLER Assistant Attorney General DAVID M. COHEN Director BRIAN M. SIMKIN Assistant Director BRENT M. McBURNEY Trial Attorney Commercial Litigation Branch Civil Division Department of Justice 1100 L Street, Room 12074 Washington, D.C. 20530 Tele: (202) 307-0277 April 29, 2004 Attorneys for Defendant

Case 1:02-cv-00796-FMA

Document 32-2

Filed 04/29/2004

Page 2 of 3

INDEX TO APPENDIX DEFENDANT'S EXHIBITS: 1. 2. 3. 5. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. PAGE

Extract from Contract No. N00600-99-C-0389. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1-34 Extract from Subcontract Agreement . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 35-48 Excerpts From Deposition of William Robertson, pp. 76-79 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 49-53 Letter from Lisa Murtha, to ISN, dated June 26, 1995 (Pl. Ex. 6) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 54 Memorandum from Daniel Tobin, dated August 23, 1995 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 55 ISN Progress Reports For Septermber - December 1995 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 56-70 Letter from Donald Tabasco to Navy, dated January 26, 1996. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 71-72 Memorandum from Jeff Bergdahl to ISN, dated August 31, 1995 (Pl. Ex. 8) . . . . . . . . 73 Funding Document, dated August 29, 1995 (Pl. Ex. 9) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 74 Funding Document, dated November 27, 1995. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 75 Letter from Roscoe Crawford to ISN, dated February 20, 1996 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 76 Notice of Termination, dated March 15, 1996. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 77-81 Termination Settlement Proposal dated June 6, 1996 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 82-90 Letter from Thomas Parnon to ISN, dated December 29, 1999 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 91 one set of color photographs will be provided to the court at a later date. Defense Contract Audit Agency, Audit Report No. 6311-97B17100001, dated, December 19, 1996. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 92-101 Defense Contract Audit Agency, Audit Report No. 6221-96G17500001, dated, November 13, 1995. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 102-109

Case 1:02-cv-00796-FMA

Document 32-2

Filed 04/29/2004

Page 3 of 3

INDEX TO APPENDIX - Con't. DEFENDANT'S EXHIBITS: 17. 18. 19. 20. 21. 22. PAGE

Excerpts from Oral Argument and Status Conference, October 3, 2001. . . . . . . . 110-114 Order of Judgment, U.S. Ct. App. Federal Circuit, October 16, 2002 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 115 Typed Meeting Notes, dated December 6, 1995 (compare Pl. Ex. 11) . . . . . . . . . 116-117 Excerpts From Deposition of William Robertson, pp. 219-220 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 118-120 Excerpts From Deposition of Roscoe Crawfrod, pp. 36, 66 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 121-123 Excerpts From Deposition of Jeffrey Bergdahl, pp. 46, 101-106 . . . . . . . . . . . . . 124-131

Case 1:02-cv-00796-FMA

Document 32-3

Filed 04/29/2004

Page 1 of 18

Case 1:02-cv-00796-FMA

Document 32-3

Filed 04/29/2004

Page 2 of 18

Case 1:02-cv-00796-FMA

Document 32-3

Filed 04/29/2004

Page 3 of 18

Case 1:02-cv-00796-FMA

Document 32-3

Filed 04/29/2004

Page 4 of 18

Case 1:02-cv-00796-FMA

Document 32-3

Filed 04/29/2004

Page 5 of 18

Case 1:02-cv-00796-FMA

Document 32-3

Filed 04/29/2004

Page 6 of 18

Case 1:02-cv-00796-FMA

Document 32-3

Filed 04/29/2004

Page 7 of 18

Case 1:02-cv-00796-FMA

Document 32-3

Filed 04/29/2004

Page 8 of 18

Case 1:02-cv-00796-FMA

Document 32-3

Filed 04/29/2004

Page 9 of 18

Case 1:02-cv-00796-FMA

Document 32-3

Filed 04/29/2004

Page 10 of 18

Case 1:02-cv-00796-FMA

Document 32-3

Filed 04/29/2004

Page 11 of 18

Case 1:02-cv-00796-FMA

Document 32-3

Filed 04/29/2004

Page 12 of 18

Case 1:02-cv-00796-FMA

Document 32-3

Filed 04/29/2004

Page 13 of 18

Case 1:02-cv-00796-FMA

Document 32-3

Filed 04/29/2004

Page 14 of 18

Case 1:02-cv-00796-FMA

Document 32-3

Filed 04/29/2004

Page 15 of 18

Case 1:02-cv-00796-FMA

Document 32-3

Filed 04/29/2004

Page 16 of 18

Case 1:02-cv-00796-FMA

Document 32-3

Filed 04/29/2004

Page 17 of 18

Case 1:02-cv-00796-FMA

Document 32-3

Filed 04/29/2004

Page 18 of 18

Case 1:02-cv-00796-FMA

Document 32-4

Filed 04/29/2004

Page 1 of 21

Case 1:02-cv-00796-FMA

Document 32-4

Filed 04/29/2004

Page 2 of 21

Case 1:02-cv-00796-FMA

Document 32-4

Filed 04/29/2004

Page 3 of 21

Case 1:02-cv-00796-FMA

Document 32-4

Filed 04/29/2004

Page 4 of 21

Case 1:02-cv-00796-FMA

Document 32-4

Filed 04/29/2004

Page 5 of 21

Case 1:02-cv-00796-FMA

Document 32-4

Filed 04/29/2004

Page 6 of 21

Case 1:02-cv-00796-FMA

Document 32-4

Filed 04/29/2004

Page 7 of 21

Case 1:02-cv-00796-FMA

Document 32-4

Filed 04/29/2004

Page 8 of 21

Case 1:02-cv-00796-FMA

Document 32-4

Filed 04/29/2004

Page 9 of 21

Case 1:02-cv-00796-FMA

Document 32-4

Filed 04/29/2004

Page 10 of 21

Case 1:02-cv-00796-FMA

Document 32-4

Filed 04/29/2004

Page 11 of 21

Case 1:02-cv-00796-FMA

Document 32-4

Filed 04/29/2004

Page 12 of 21

Case 1:02-cv-00796-FMA

Document 32-4

Filed 04/29/2004

Page 13 of 21

Case 1:02-cv-00796-FMA

Document 32-4

Filed 04/29/2004

Page 14 of 21

Case 1:02-cv-00796-FMA

Document 32-4

Filed 04/29/2004

Page 15 of 21

Case 1:02-cv-00796-FMA

Document 32-4

Filed 04/29/2004

Page 16 of 21

Case 1:02-cv-00796-FMA

Document 32-4

Filed 04/29/2004

Page 17 of 21

Case 1:02-cv-00796-FMA

Document 32-4

Filed 04/29/2004

Page 18 of 21

Case 1:02-cv-00796-FMA

Document 32-4

Filed 04/29/2004

Page 19 of 21

Case 1:02-cv-00796-FMA

Document 32-4

Filed 04/29/2004

Page 20 of 21

Case 1:02-cv-00796-FMA

Document 32-4

Filed 04/29/2004

Page 21 of 21

Case 1:02-cv-00796-FMA

Document 32-5

Filed 04/29/2004

Page 1 of 21

Case 1:02-cv-00796-FMA

Document 32-5

Filed 04/29/2004

Page 2 of 21

Case 1:02-cv-00796-FMA

Document 32-5

Filed 04/29/2004

Page 3 of 21

Case 1:02-cv-00796-FMA

Document 32-5

Filed 04/29/2004

Page 4 of 21

Case 1:02-cv-00796-FMA

Document 32-5

Filed 04/29/2004

Page 5 of 21

Case 1:02-cv-00796-FMA

Document 32-5

Filed 04/29/2004

Page 6 of 21

Case 1:02-cv-00796-FMA

Document 32-5

Filed 04/29/2004

Page 7 of 21

Case 1:02-cv-00796-FMA

Document 32-5

Filed 04/29/2004

Page 8 of 21

Case 1:02-cv-00796-FMA

Document 32-5

Filed 04/29/2004

Page 9 of 21

Case 1:02-cv-00796-FMA

Document 32-5

Filed 04/29/2004

Page 10 of 21

Case 1:02-cv-00796-FMA

Document 32-5

Filed 04/29/2004

Page 11 of 21

Case 1:02-cv-00796-FMA

Document 32-5

Filed 04/29/2004

Page 12 of 21

Case 1:02-cv-00796-FMA

Document 32-5

Filed 04/29/2004

Page 13 of 21

Case 1:02-cv-00796-FMA

Document 32-5

Filed 04/29/2004

Page 14 of 21

Case 1:02-cv-00796-FMA

Document 32-5

Filed 04/29/2004

Page 15 of 21

Case 1:02-cv-00796-FMA

Document 32-5

Filed 04/29/2004

Page 16 of 21

Case 1:02-cv-00796-FMA

Document 32-5

Filed 04/29/2004

Page 17 of 21

Case 1:02-cv-00796-FMA

Document 32-5

Filed 04/29/2004

Page 18 of 21

Case 1:02-cv-00796-FMA

Document 32-5

Filed 04/29/2004

Page 19 of 21

Case 1:02-cv-00796-FMA

Document 32-5

Filed 04/29/2004

Page 20 of 21

Case 1:02-cv-00796-FMA

Document 32-5

Filed 04/29/2004

Page 21 of 21

Case 1:02-cv-00796-FMA

Document 32-6

Filed 04/29/2004

Page 1 of 25

Case 1:02-cv-00796-FMA

Document 32-6

Filed 04/29/2004

Page 2 of 25

Case 1:02-cv-00796-FMA

Document 32-6

Filed 04/29/2004

Page 3 of 25

Case 1:02-cv-00796-FMA

Document 32-6

Filed 04/29/2004

Page 4 of 25

Case 1:02-cv-00796-FMA

Document 32-6

Filed 04/29/2004

Page 5 of 25

Case 1:02-cv-00796-FMA

Document 32-6

Filed 04/29/2004

Page 6 of 25

Case 1:02-cv-00796-FMA

Document 32-6

Filed 04/29/2004

Page 7 of 25

Case 1:02-cv-00796-FMA

Document 32-6

Filed 04/29/2004

Page 8 of 25

Case 1:02-cv-00796-FMA

Document 32-6

Filed 04/29/2004

Page 9 of 25

Case 1:02-cv-00796-FMA

Document 32-6

Filed 04/29/2004

Page 10 of 25

Case 1:02-cv-00796-FMA

Document 32-6

Filed 04/29/2004

Page 11 of 25

Case 1:02-cv-00796-FMA

Document 32-6

Filed 04/29/2004

Page 12 of 25

Case 1:02-cv-00796-FMA

Document 32-6

Filed 04/29/2004

Page 13 of 25

Case 1:02-cv-00796-FMA

Document 32-6

Filed 04/29/2004

Page 14 of 25

Case 1:02-cv-00796-FMA

Document 32-6

Filed 04/29/2004

Page 15 of 25

Case 1:02-cv-00796-FMA

Document 32-6

Filed 04/29/2004

Page 16 of 25

Case 1:02-cv-00796-FMA

Document 32-6

Filed 04/29/2004

Page 17 of 25

Case 1:02-cv-00796-FMA

Document 32-6

Filed 04/29/2004

Page 18 of 25

Case 1:02-cv-00796-FMA

Document 32-6

Filed 04/29/2004

Page 19 of 25

Case 1:02-cv-00796-FMA

Document 32-6

Filed 04/29/2004

Page 20 of 25

Case 1:02-cv-00796-FMA

Document 32-6

Filed 04/29/2004

Page 21 of 25

Case 1:02-cv-00796-FMA

Document 32-6

Filed 04/29/2004

Page 22 of 25

Case 1:02-cv-00796-FMA

Document 32-6

Filed 04/29/2004

Page 23 of 25

Case 1:02-cv-00796-FMA

Document 32-6

Filed 04/29/2004

Page 24 of 25

Case 1:02-cv-00796-FMA

Document 32-6

Filed 04/29/2004

Page 25 of 25

Case 1:02-cv-00796-FMA

Document 32-7

Filed 04/29/2004

Page 1 of 25

Case 1:02-cv-00796-FMA

Document 32-7

Filed 04/29/2004

Page 2 of 25

Case 1:02-cv-00796-FMA

Document 32-7

Filed 04/29/2004

Page 3 of 25

Case 1:02-cv-00796-FMA

Document 32-7

Filed 04/29/2004

Page 4 of 25

Case 1:02-cv-00796-FMA

Document 32-7

Filed 04/29/2004

Page 5 of 25

Case 1:02-cv-00796-FMA

Document 32-7

Filed 04/29/2004

Page 6 of 25

Case 1:02-cv-00796-FMA

Document 32-7

Filed 04/29/2004

Page 7 of 25

Case 1:02-cv-00796-FMA

Document 32-7

Filed 04/29/2004

Page 8 of 25

Case 1:02-cv-00796-FMA

Document 32-7

Filed 04/29/2004

Page 9 of 25

Case 1:02-cv-00796-FMA

Document 32-7

Filed 04/29/2004

Page 10 of 25

Case 1:02-cv-00796-FMA

Document 32-7

Filed 04/29/2004

Page 11 of 25

Case 1:02-cv-00796-FMA

Document 32-7

Filed 04/29/2004

Page 12 of 25

Case 1:02-cv-00796-FMA

Document 32-7

Filed 04/29/2004

Page 13 of 25

Case 1:02-cv-00796-FMA

Document 32-7

Filed 04/29/2004

Page 14 of 25

Case 1:02-cv-00796-FMA

Document 32-7

Filed 04/29/2004

Page 15 of 25

Case 1:02-cv-00796-FMA

Document 32-7

Filed 04/29/2004

Page 16 of 25

Case 1:02-cv-00796-FMA

Document 32-7

Filed 04/29/2004

Page 17 of 25

Case 1:02-cv-00796-FMA

Document 32-7

Filed 04/29/2004

Page 18 of 25

Case 1:02-cv-00796-FMA

Document 32-7

Filed 04/29/2004

Page 19 of 25

Case 1:02-cv-00796-FMA

Document 32-7

Filed 04/29/2004

Page 20 of 25

Case 1:02-cv-00796-FMA

Document 32-7

Filed 04/29/2004

Page 21 of 25

Case 1:02-cv-00796-FMA

Document 32-7

Filed 04/29/2004

Page 22 of 25

Case 1:02-cv-00796-FMA

Document 32-7

Filed 04/29/2004

Page 23 of 25

Case 1:02-cv-00796-FMA

Document 32-7

Filed 04/29/2004

Page 24 of 25

Case 1:02-cv-00796-FMA

Document 32-7

Filed 04/29/2004

Page 25 of 25

Case 1:02-cv-00796-FMA

Document 32-8

Filed 04/29/2004

Page 1 of 23

Case 1:02-cv-00796-FMA

Document 32-8

Filed 04/29/2004

Page 2 of 23

Case 1:02-cv-00796-FMA

Document 32-8

Filed 04/29/2004

Page 3 of 23

Case 1:02-cv-00796-FMA

Document 32-8

Filed 04/29/2004

Page 4 of 23

Case 1:02-cv-00796-FMA

Document 32-8

Filed 04/29/2004

Page 5 of 23

Case 1:02-cv-00796-FMA

Document 32-8

Filed 04/29/2004

Page 6 of 23

Case 1:02-cv-00796-FMA

Document 32-8

Filed 04/29/2004

Page 7 of 23

Case 1:02-cv-00796-FMA

Document 32-8

Filed 04/29/2004

Page 8 of 23

Case 1:02-cv-00796-FMA

Document 32-8

Filed 04/29/2004

Page 9 of 23

Case 1:02-cv-00796-FMA

Document 32-8

Filed 04/29/2004

Page 10 of 23

Case 1:02-cv-00796-FMA

Document 32-8

Filed 04/29/2004

Page 11 of 23

Case 1:02-cv-00796-FMA

Document 32-8

Filed 04/29/2004

Page 12 of 23

Case 1:02-cv-00796-FMA

Document 32-8

Filed 04/29/2004

Page 13 of 23

Case 1:02-cv-00796-FMA

Document 32-8

Filed 04/29/2004

Page 14 of 23

Case 1:02-cv-00796-FMA

Document 32-8

Filed 04/29/2004

Page 15 of 23

Case 1:02-cv-00796-FMA

Document 32-8

Filed 04/29/2004

Page 16 of 23

Case 1:02-cv-00796-FMA

Document 32-8

Filed 04/29/2004

Page 17 of 23

Case 1:02-cv-00796-FMA

Document 32-8

Filed 04/29/2004

Page 18 of 23

Case 1:02-cv-00796-FMA

Document 32-8

Filed 04/29/2004

Page 19 of 23

Case 1:02-cv-00796-FMA

Document 32-8

Filed 04/29/2004

Page 20 of 23

Case 1:02-cv-00796-FMA

Document 32-8

Filed 04/29/2004

Page 21 of 23

Case 1:02-cv-00796-FMA

Document 32-8

Filed 04/29/2004

Page 22 of 23

Case 1:02-cv-00796-FMA

Document 32-8

Filed 04/29/2004

Page 23 of 23