Free Motion for Extension of Time - District Court of Federal Claims - federal


File Size: 30.4 kB
Pages: 3
Date: March 8, 2007
File Format: PDF
State: federal
Category: District
Author: unknown
Word Count: 439 Words, 2,850 Characters
Page Size: Letter (8 1/2" x 11")
URL

https://www.findforms.com/pdf_files/cofc/21350/19.pdf

Download Motion for Extension of Time - District Court of Federal Claims ( 30.4 kB)


Preview Motion for Extension of Time - District Court of Federal Claims
Case 1:06-cv-00432-LSM

Document 19

Filed 03/08/2007

Page 1 of 3

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF FEDERAL CLAIMS CONTINENTAL AIRLINES, INC., Plaintiff, v. THE UNITED STATES, Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

No. 06-432C (Senior Judge Margolis)

DEFENDANT'S SECOND UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR ENLARGEMENT OF TIME Pursuant to Rules 6 and 6.1 of the Court's Rules ("RCFC"), defendant, the United States, respectfully requests the Court to further enlarge the deadline for our opposition to plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment (and reply in support of our motion to dismiss) by five business days, from March 9 to March 16, 2007. This is our second request to enlarge this deadline. The Court previously granted our motion to enlarge the deadline by 14 days. Adam P. Feinberg, counsel for plaintiff, Continental Airlines, Inc., states that Continental does not oppose this motion. We anticipate filing no further motions to enlarge this deadline. As we previously advised the Court, all of the Government counsel assigned to this case are also involved in American Airlines, Inc. v. United States, No. 04-1736C, in which defendant's expert disclosures concerning damages are due on March 15, pursuant to an expedited schedule. (Likewise, Mr. Feinberg represents plaintiff in American.) Additionally, counsel from the two agencies involved here, U.S. Customs and Border Protection and the United States Department of Agriculture, have experienced delays in obtaining information and affidavits from Government personnel who were involved in the earlier audits of Continental that are at issue but have since moved to other positions, or have retired. Under these circumstances, this second requested enlargement is reasonable and should cause no prejudice or undue delay.

Case 1:06-cv-00432-LSM

Document 19

Filed 03/08/2007

Page 2 of 3

CONCLUSION Accordingly, we respectfully request the Court to further enlarge the deadline for our opposition to plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment, and our reply in support of our motion to dismiss, by five business days, from March 9 to and including March 16, 2007. Respectfully submitted, PETER D. KEISLER Assistant Attorney General s/Jeanne E. Davidson by Donald E. Kinner JEANNE E. DAVIDSON Acting Director

s/Kyle Chadwick KYLE CHADWICK Senior Trial Counsel Commercial Litigation Branch Civil Division Department of Justice Attn: Classification, 8th Floor 1100 L Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20530 Tele: (202) 616-0476 Fax: (202) 305-7644 Attorneys for Defendant March 8, 2007

2

Case 1:06-cv-00432-LSM

Document 19

Filed 03/08/2007

Page 3 of 3

CERTIFICATE OF FILING I certify that on March 8, 2007, the attached was filed electronically. I understand that service is complete upon filing and that parties and others may access the filing through the Court's system. s/Kyle Chadwick

3