Free Motion for Extension of Time to File Answer - District Court of Federal Claims - federal


File Size: 14.4 kB
Pages: 3
Date: August 15, 2007
File Format: PDF
State: federal
Category: District
Author: unknown
Word Count: 514 Words, 3,132 Characters
Page Size: Letter (8 1/2" x 11")
URL

https://www.findforms.com/pdf_files/cofc/21366/28.pdf

Download Motion for Extension of Time to File Answer - District Court of Federal Claims ( 14.4 kB)


Preview Motion for Extension of Time to File Answer - District Court of Federal Claims
Case 1:06-cv-00448-GWM

Document 28

Filed 08/15/2007

Page 1 of 3

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF FEDERAL CLAIMS MICHAEL KAWA, Plaintiff, v. THE UNITED STATES, Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

No. 06-448C (Judge George W. Miller)

DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR AN ENLARGEMENT OF TIME, OUT OF TIME, WITHIN WHICH TO FILE ITS ANSWER Pursuant to Rules 6(b)(2) and 6.1 of the Rules of the United States Court of Federal Claims ("RCFC"), defendant, the United States, respectfully requests that the Court grant an enlargement of time of 53 days, to and including September 4, 2007, within which to prepare and file our answer. Pursuant to RCFC 12(a), the answer was due on July 13, 2007. This is our first request for an enlargement of time for this purpose. Defendant's counsel contacted plaintiff Michael Kawa's counsel, Joseph A. Camardo, Jr., and was informed that Mr. Kawa will object to this motion for enlargement of time. As set forth in detail in our response to Mr. Kawa's motion for default judgment, the United States' failure to timely file its answer was the result of excusable neglect. Since this case was assigned to defendant's counsel in March 2007, she has been actively working on it, but has been focused upon settlement, rather than upon furthering the litigation. Following the Court's denial of defendant's motion to dismiss, there was never any mention of filing an answer by the Court or by Mr. Kawa's counsel. Prior to receiving Mr. Kawa's motion for default judgment, defendant's counsel was unaware of the requirements of RCFC 12(a) concerning filing of an answer following denial of a motion to dismiss. Thus, defendant's counsel's failure to timely file the answer was the result of mere negligence, and was not a willful violation of this

Case 1:06-cv-00448-GWM

Document 28

Filed 08/15/2007

Page 2 of 3

Court's rules. The enlargement of time requested is necessary because defendant's counsel will be on medical leave from August 16, 2007 through at least August 27, 2007. Accordingly, we respectfully request that the Court grant defendant's motion for an enlargement of time of 53 days, to and including September 4, 2007, in which to file the Government's answer.

Respectfully Submitted, PETER D. KEISLER Assistant Attorney General JEANNE E. DAVIDSON Director /s/ FRANKLIN E. WHITE, JR. FRANKLIN E. WHITE, JR. Assistant Director /s/ MEREDYTH D. COHEN MEREDYTH D. COHEN Trial Attorney Commercial Litigation Branch Civil Division Department of Justice 1100 L Street NW Attn: Classification Unit 8th Floor Tel: (202) 353-7978 Fax: (202) 514-8624 Washington, DC 20530 August 15, 2007 Attorneys for Defendant

2

Case 1:06-cv-00448-GWM

Document 28

Filed 08/15/2007

Page 3 of 3

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I certify under that on this 15th day of August, 2007, a copy of the foregoing "DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR AN ENLARGEMENT OF TIME, OUT OF TIME, WITHIN WHICH TO FILE ITS ANSWER" was filed electronically. In understand that notice of this filing will be sent to all parties by operation of the Court's electronic filing system. Parties may access this filing through the Court's system.

/s/ MEREDYTH D. COHEN