Free Motion for Miscellaneous Relief - District Court of Federal Claims - federal

Case 1:06-cv-00945-FMA

Document 15-6

Filed 05/21/2007

Page 1 of 8

WordPerfect Document Compare Summary Original document: 2004-03-19 POL v. US, RRO text.wpd Revised document: 20070521 NN RRO final.wpd Deletions are shown with the following attributes and color: Strikeout, Blue RGB(0,0,255). Deleted text is shown as full text. Insertions are shown with the following attributes and color: Double Underline, Redline, Red RGB(255,0,0). The document was marked with 123 Deletions, 118 Insertions, 0 Moves.

Plaintiff's Exhibit 3

Case 1:06-cv-00945-FMA

Document 15-6

Filed 05/21/2007

Page 2 of 8

United States Court of Federal Claims. The PUEBLO OF LAGUNA, Plaintiff, v. The UNITED STATES, Defendant. No. 02-24 L. Based on the foregoing, pursuant UNITED STATES COURT OF FEDERAL CLAIMS NAVAJO NATION f.k.a. NAVAJO TRIBE OF INDIANS, Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

No. 06-945 L Judge Francis M. Allegra

RECORD RETENTION ORDER THIS MATTER comes before the Court on Plaintiff's Motion for Entry of Record Retention Order. The Court has reviewed the motion, additional filings of the parties, relevant facts, and governing law, and finds that good cause exists for approval and entry of the proposed Record Retention Order. Therefore, Plaintiff's motion is hereby GRANTED. Pursuant to RCFC 16(c) and 26(c), as well as this court'sCourt's inherent power to regulate its proceedings and maintain the integrity of its functions, IT IS ORDERED: 1. General Obligation to Preserve. (a)

During the pendency of this litigation or until further order of the cCourt, dDefendant, and its departments, agencies, and its employees, agents, and contractors must take reasonable steps to preserve every document, dataum, or tangible thing in its possession, custody, or control, containing information that is relevant to, or may reasonably lead to the discovery of information relevant to, the subject matter involved in the pending litigation ("Navajo Trust Record"). Plaintiff is reminded that it also has a similar duty to preserve evidence relevant to this case. 2. Document Inspection.

Case 1:06-cv-00945-FMA

Document 15-6

Filed 05/21/2007

Page 3 of 8

(a) The Department of the Interior ("DOI") shall move inactive Pueblo of Laguna records from the BIA Southwest Regional Office to the Office of Trust Records ("OTR"), in Albuquerque, New Mexico, at which location said inactive records shall be made available to plaintiff (b) Defendant shall issue instructions to all of its departments, agencies, employees, agents, and contractors that may handle Navajo Trust Records to ensure retention and retrievability of all Navajo Trust Records. Unless it is indisputable that a record is not a Navajo Trust Record, Defendant must preserve it under this Order. If Defendant is uncertain whether any action concerning a Navajo Trust Record would constitute a failure to preserve that record, Defendant shall confer with Plaintiff regarding the proposed action.

2.

Document Inspection and Production. (a)

Defendant shall make available to Plaintiff for purposes of inspection. At least 10 calender days prior to movement of the, inactive records, DOI will provide plaintiff with a move plan, which plan shall include: an implementation schedule; a description or inventory of the records being moved; the method of transportation; the chain of custody; and the signature of the official responsible for the move. Compliance with the move plan may be monitored by plaintiff or its representative. (b) After reviewing the inactive records at OTR and the Southern Pueblos Agency for privileged material, DOINavajo Trust Records of the following offices at those offices: the Bureau of Indian Affairs ("BIA") Navajo Regional Office, the BIA Chinle Agency, the BIA Fort Defiance Agency, the BIA Western Navajo Agency, the BIA Eastern Navajo Agency, and the BIA Shiprock Agency, and any predecessor offices therefor (collectively, "BIA Navajo Offices"); the American Indian Records Repository ("AIRR") in Lenexa, Kansas or other federal record centers; and the Office of Trust Records ("OTR") or the Office of the Special Trustee ("OST") in Albuquerque, New Mexico. (b) Defendant shall make those records available for plaintiff'sPlaintiff's inspection, in accordance with the following schedule: (i)

(i) On or before April 2, 2004

Within 60 days after entry of this Order, DOIDefendant shall provide pPlaintiff with any and all existing indices or inventories of inactive records or record boxes located at the OTR, the *142 Southwest Regional Office, or the Southern Pueblos Agency. (ii) On or before May 3, 2004, plaintiffabove offices in the most useable form readily available. Plaintiff shall designate the boxes or records listed in the provided indices that pPlaintiff wishes to review for Pueblo of Laguna trust records. (iii) Within 49 days fromNavajo Trust Records at any time; provided, however, that if Defendant has informed Plaintiff in writing that it intends to move certain records to another location, then Plaintiff shall make such designations for those certain records within 90 days after receiving such notice from Defendant or within some other time agreed to by the parties. 3 (ii)

Case 1:06-cv-00945-FMA

Document 15-6

Filed 05/21/2007

Page 4 of 8

Within 60 days after the date on which pPlaintiff designates whichcertain boxes at OTRone or more of the above offices it wishes to inspect, DOIwhich period shall include any privilege review Defendant deems necessary, Defendant will begin to make available, on a rolling basis, the boxes at OTRsuch offices for plaintiff's inspection. (iv) Within 63 days from the date on which plaintiff designates which boxes at the Southern Pueblos Agency it wishes to inspect, DOI will begin to make available, on a rolling basis, the boxes at the Southern Pueblos Agency for plaintiff's inspection. (c) Plaintiff's inspection. Plaintiff generally shall have 6390 days within which to inspect a designated record upon receiving notification from DOIDefendant that the designated record has become available for inspection, during which process pPlaintiff may identify relevant documents for production. This inspection period may be extended by agreement of the cparties or by the Court for good cause shown. Defendant shall provide to pPlaintiff copies or electronic images of the documents identified by pPlaintiff pursuant to this provision within such time as is agreed to by the parties; barring such agreement, the parties shall each file with the court their proposed schedule for the production of such copies or images, with an explanation in support thereof. (d) . For documents originating in media other than paper, Defendant shall provide the document in a reasonably usable form, including any form reasonably requested by Plaintiff, and also shall provide an opportunity to Plaintiff to test or sample such documents upon reasonable request. (d) At such time as the inactive records identified by pPlaintiff have been copied or imagedproduced by dDefendant to Plaintiff, DOIDefendant may move those records from OTR and the Southern Pueblos Agencyabove offices in accordance with its normal procedures and protocols for the movement of Indian trust records. In addition, DOIDefendant may move any boxes designated by pPlaintiff from OTR or the Southern Pueblos Agencyabove offices that pPlaintiff has not reviewed within three months120 days from the date on which DOIDefendant made those boxes available under paragraph 2(b)(iii) for plaintiff'sPlaintiff's inspection. DOIDefendant may, at any time, move boxes that have not been designated for inspection, and according to normal procedures and protocols for the movement of Indian trust records, move boxes that Plaintiff has indicated to Defendant in writing will not be designated for inspection. Nothing herein prevents pPlaintiff from alsolater seeking to inspect relevant records from OTR, the BIA Southwest Regional Office, or the Southern Pueblos Agencyabove offices in whatever location they may be found in the future. (c)

(iii)

3. Indexation. (a) (e) The parties shall meet and confer, to discuss a timetable to be used for Defendant to make available to Plaintiff for purposes of inspection active Navajo Trust Records of all of Defendant's departments, agencies, employees, agents, and contractors and all inactive Navajo Trust Records at offices other than the BIA Navajo Offices, the 4

Case 1:06-cv-00945-FMA

Document 15-6

Filed 05/21/2007

Page 5 of 8

AIRR in Lenexa, and OTR and OST in Albuquerque. The Defendant, after reviewing the records for privileged material, if necessary, shall make the respective record collections available to Plaintiff for purposes of inspection and designation. Unless otherwise agreed by the parties, Defendant shall make such records available for Plaintiff's inspection within 90 days of Plaintiff's designation of them. Plaintiff shall inspect the trust records upon receiving notification from Defendant that the records have become available for inspection. If Plaintiff identifies relevant documents for production, Defendant shall provide to Plaintiff copies or electronic images of the documents, or other data in a reasonably usable form, within such time as is agreed to by the parties. (f) The parties shall attempt to reach agreement on all matters related to document inspection and shall coordinate inspection of Navajo Trust Records in a manner that will minimize the disruption of ongoing governmental activities.

3.

Indexation and Inventorying. (a) Pursuant to Defendant's duties as a trustee to create, maintain in a businesslike manner, and make available to Plaintiff trust records related to Plaintiff's trust assets, Defendant could be expected to have maintained and to provide document-level indices and inventories for each location that may contain Plaintiff's trust records. Within 120 days after entry of this Order, Defendant shall identify all potential repositories under Defendant's control not addressed in section 2(b) above that may contain Navajo Trust Records and determine whether indices or inventories exist for each location. Defendant also shall have an ongoing duty to assist Plaintiff in all practicable ways to identify Navajo Trust Records in Defendant's record collections. Within the same time period or as the parties may agree, Defendant shall provide to Plaintiff any and all existing indices and inventories for such repositories in the most useful form readily available, except for indices or inventories previously provided pursuant to paragraph 2 of this Order. This includes without limitation Defendant's so-called Box Inventory Search System ("BISS") database, which contains box and file/folder information for thousands of boxes of Indian trust records, including some unknown number that contain Navajo Trust Records. Defendant also shall provide to Plaintiff all manuals, training materials, and similar documents which describe the BISS database and its manner of operation and access. If Defendant is unable to provide Plaintiff with document-level indices or inventories of the repositories containing Navajo Trust Records, then the parties shall meet and confer as soon as practicable, and no later than April 19, 2004, to develop a plan for indexing documents, data and tangible things reasonably anticipated to be subject to discovery in this case. The resulting plan shall be submitted to this court as a proposed order under RCFC 16(e).

(b)

(c)

(d)

5

Case 1:06-cv-00945-FMA

Document 15-6

Filed 05/21/2007

Page 6 of 8

(b) The parties should about the possibility of using, as may be appropriate, a collection-bycollection approach, including on-site reviews, to address the sufficiency of existing indices or inventories and to discuss whether additional indexation of specific record collections is necessary and the scope, timing, and method of any additional indexation or elaboration of inventories at each location based on the particular facts relating to each repository and record characteristics. Defendant shall provide additional indices or inventories of Navajo Trust Records promptly after creation of such additional indices or inventories. (e) The parties shall cooperate in good faith to attempt to reach agreement on all issues regarding the indexation or inventorying of documents, data, and tangible things. These issues include, but are not necessarily limited to:

(i) (i) the extent of the indexation and inventorying obligation, identifying the types of material to be indexed and inventoried, the subject matter, time frame, the authors and addressees, and key words to be used in identifying such materials;

(ii) (ii) the identification of persons responsible for carrying out the indexation or inventorying; whether indexation or inventorying will require suspending or modifying any routine processes or procedures, with special attention to documentmanagement programs and the recycling of computer data storage media;

(iii)

(iii)

(iv) (iv) the timing of the indexation or inventorying process in relation to the movement of records, and inspection thereof, envisioned in paragraph 2, above;

(v) (v) *143 (vi) (vi) (vii) a mechanism to review and modify the indexation and inventorying obligation as this case proceeds, eliminating or adding particular categories of documents, data, and tangible things. (c) If, after conferring to develop an indexation plan, counsel do not reach agreement on the subjects listed under paragraph 3(b) of this order or on other material aspects of indexation, the parties shall 6 (vii) the anticipated costs of indexation and inventorying and ways to reduce or share these costs; and the methods to index on inventorying any volatile but potentially discoverable material, such as voicemail, active data in databases, or electronic messages;

Case 1:06-cv-00945-FMA

Document 15-6

Filed 05/21/2007

Page 7 of 8

file with the court, within seven days of the conference, a statement of the unresolved issues together with each party's proposal for their resolution of the issues 4. Compliance. 4. Compliance. Defendant shall establish a mechanism for monitoring compliance with this oOrder and, on or before April 19, 2004one year after entry of this Order, file a status report with the cCourt describing that mechanism. Defendant''s counsel shall immediately notify this ce Court if, at any time, they become aware of a violation of this oOrder (e.g., the destruction or loss of documents). Definitions. For purposes of this oOrder: (a) "Documents "Documents, data, and tangible things"" is to be interpreted broadly to include writings; records; files; correspondence; reports; memoranda; calendars; diaries; minutes; electronic messages; voicemail; Ee-mail; telephone message records or logs; computer and network activity logs; hard drives; backup data; removable computer storage media such as tapes, disks, and cards; printouts; document image files; Wweb pages; databases; data or data compilations stored in any medium; spreadsheets; software; books; ledgers; journals; orders; invoices; bills; vouchers; checks; statements; worksheets; summaries; compilations; computations; charts; diagrams; graphic presentations; drawings; films; charts; digital or chemical process photographs; video; phonographic tape; or digital recordings or transcripts thereof; drafts; jottings; and notes. Information that serves to identify, locate, or link such material, such as file inventories, file folders, indices, and metadata, is also included in this definition.

5.

(b) "Preservation" (b) "Preservation" is to be interpreted broadly to accomplish the goal of maintaining the integrity of all documents, data, and tangible things reasonably anticipated to be subject to discovery under RCFC 26, 45, and 56(e) in this action. Preservation includes taking reasonable steps to prevent the partial or full destruction, alteration, testing, deletion, shredding, incineration, wiping, relocation, migration, theft, or mutation of such material, as well as negligent handling, or intentional handling that would makemishandling of any documents, data, or tangible things, if such action would make that material incomplete or inaccessible.

6.

Further Instructions; Modification. If, after counsel confer, unresolved issues remain but require resolution concerning matters arising under this Order or other material aspects of preservation, inspection and production, or indexation and inventorying, the parties shall file with the Court, within fourteen days of the relevant conference, a statement of the unresolved issues together with each party's proposal for their resolution. Either party also may apply to the cCourt for further instructions regarding, inter alia: (a) defendant'sDefendant's 7

Case 1:06-cv-00945-FMA

Document 15-6

Filed 05/21/2007

Page 8 of 8

obligation to preserve specific categories of documents, data, or tangible things; (b) any aspect of the inspection or indexation tasks not herein clearly defined; and (c) allocating copying costs and maintaining the confidentiality of information contained in various records. Recognizing that the parties may perceive better ways of accomplishing the purposes of this order, the court notes that joint motions to modify any of the procedures listed herein will likely be received favorably. 7. Sanctions. Failure to comply with this order may lead to the imposition of sanctions, as described in greater detail above. Dissemination. This oOrder shall be distributed by dDefendant to all relevant agencies, departments, offices, divisions, and individuals.

8.

___________________________________ Francis M. Allegra Judge

8