Free Answer - District Court of Federal Claims - federal


File Size: 20.0 kB
Pages: 4
Date: January 25, 2008
File Format: PDF
State: federal
Category: District
Author: unknown
Word Count: 694 Words, 4,371 Characters
Page Size: Letter (8 1/2" x 11")
URL

https://www.findforms.com/pdf_files/cofc/22811/6.pdf

Download Answer - District Court of Federal Claims ( 20.0 kB)


Preview Answer - District Court of Federal Claims
Case 1:07-cv-00816-CCM

Document 6

Filed 01/25/2008

Page 1 of 4

UNITED STATES COURT OF FEDERAL CLAIMS (Electronically Filed January 25, 2008)

) ) ) ) ) ) Plaintiff, ) v. ) ) ) THE UNITED STATES, ) ) Defendant. ) _____________________________________)

THE GEORGE FAMILY TRUST, BY AND THROUGH ITS TRUSTEES, JOHN P. GEORGE, JULIA P. PAPA, AND JERRY GEORGE, TRUSTEES,

No. 07-816 L Judge Christine O.C. Miller

ANSWER COMES NOW Defendant UNITED STATES, and hereby responds to the numbered paragraphs of Plaintiff's Complaint as follows: FIRST DEFENSE 1. The allegations of the Paragraph 1 are a characterization of Plaintiff's case to which no response is required. To the extent matters of fact are alleged, Defendant lacks sufficient knowledge or information to form a belief as to the truth or falsity of those allegations. 2. The allegations of the Paragraph 2 are a conclusion of law to which no response is required; to the extent matters of fact are alleged, they are denied. Defendant specifically denies that it has caused a taking of Plaintiff's property. 3. The allegations of Paragraph 3 are conclusions of law to which no response is required. In further response, Defendant admits that 28 U.S.C. Section 1491 is the principal 1

Case 1:07-cv-00816-CCM

Document 6

Filed 01/25/2008

Page 2 of 4

statute conferring jurisdiction on the United States Court of Federal Claims to hear Fifth Amendment takings claims. 4. Defendant lacks sufficient knowledge or information to form a belief as to the truth or falsity of the allegations of Paragraph 4. 5. In response to the allegations of Paragraph 5, Defendant admits that it is the United States. 6. Defendant lacks sufficient knowledge or information to form a belief as to the truth or falsity of the allegations of Paragraph 6. 7. Defendant admits that the property described in Paragraph 6 has been subject to periodic and intermittent, inevitably recurring flooding from Big Creek, as well as from overland flow. 8. The allegations of Paragraph 8 are conclusions of law to which no response is required; to the extent matters of fact are alleged, they are denied. 9. The allegations of Paragraph 9 are conclusions of law to which no response is required; to the extent matters of fact are alleged, they are denied. 10. The allegations of Paragraph 10 are conclusions of law to which no response is required; to the extent matters of fact are alleged, they are denied, except that Defendant admits that Plaintiff is requesting compensation in this lawsuit. 11. Defendant lacks sufficient knowledge or information to form a belief as to the truth or falsity of Plaintiff's awareness of flooding on its property or its actions when it became aware of the flooding. In further response, Defendant denies that the nature and extent of the damage to Plaintiff's property did not become clear and ascertainable until late 2005.

2

Case 1:07-cv-00816-CCM

Document 6

Filed 01/25/2008

Page 3 of 4

12. Defendant lacks sufficient knowledge or information to form a belief as to the truth or falsity of the allegations of Paragraph 12. 13. The allegations of Paragraph 13 are admitted. 14. The allegations of Paragraph 14 are admitted. All allegations of the complaint which have not been specifically admitted or otherwise answered are hereby denied. SECOND DEFENSE The complaint fails to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. THIRD DEFENSE The cause of action alleged in the complaint did not accrue within six years prior to the filing of this action, and is accordingly barred by the Statute of Limitations, 28 U.S.C. Section 2501. FOURTH DEFENSE Plaintiff's claim is barred by the doctrine of laches. WHEREFORE, Defendant respectfully requests that this Court enter an order: 1. Dismissing the complaint with prejudice; 2. Assessing the costs of this litigation against Plaintiffs; and 3. Granting such other relief as the Court may deem just and proper. Dated: January 25, 2008. Respectfully submitted, RONALD J. TENPAS Assistant Attorney General s/ Susan V. Cook 3

Case 1:07-cv-00816-CCM

Document 6

Filed 01/25/2008

Page 4 of 4

SUSAN V. COOK, Senior Attorney Natural Resources Section Environment & Natural Resources Division Department of Justice P.O. Box 663 Washington, D.C. 20044-0663 (202) 305-0470 (202) 305-0506 fax Email: [email protected] Attorney of Record for Defendant

4