Free Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply - District Court of Federal Claims - federal


File Size: 13.3 kB
Pages: 2
Date: May 8, 2006
File Format: PDF
State: federal
Category: District
Author: unknown
Word Count: 321 Words, 2,209 Characters
Page Size: Letter (8 1/2" x 11")
URL

https://www.findforms.com/pdf_files/cofc/4583/150.pdf

Download Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply - District Court of Federal Claims ( 13.3 kB)


Preview Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply - District Court of Federal Claims
Case 1:89-cv-00218-EJD

Document 150

Filed 05/08/2006

Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF FEDERAL CLAIMS Consolidated Case No. 89-218 L ___________________________________________ THE CHEROKEE NATION OF OKLAHOMA, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) PATTON BOGGS, ) ) Plaintiff-Intervenor, ) ) v. ) ) THE UNITED STATES, ) ) Defendant. ) ___________________________________________) ___________________________________________ THE CHOCTAW NATION OF OKLAHOMA ) AND THE CHICKASAW NATION, ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. ) ) THE UNITED STATES, ) ) Defendant. ) __________________________________________ )

No. 89-218 L

Chief Judge Edward Damich

No. 89-630 L

DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR ENLARGEMENT OF TIME TO FILE DEFENDANT'S OPPOSITION TO PATTON BOGGS' CROSS-MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT Defendant hereby moves for an enlargement of time of three days from May 8, 2006, to, and including, May 11, 2006. In which to file its opposition to Patton Boggs' Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment. In support of this motion, defendant states as follows: 1. The Defendant's Opposition to Patton Boggs Cross-Motion for Summary judgment is due to be filed on May 8, 2006;

Case 1:89-cv-00218-EJD

Document 150

Filed 05/08/2006

Page 2 of 2

2. Counsel for defendant prepared a draft of the opposition and submitted it to management for its review; 3. Counsel for defendant needs additional time to finalize the brief (that is, make the changes in the draft requested by management and do the table of contents and the table of authorities required by RCFC 5.2); 4. Counsel for Patton Boggs, David Panzer, has authorized defendant's counsel to state that Patton Boggs does not oppose this motion; 5. Counsel for the Cherokee Nation, Anne Noto, has authorized defendant's counsel to state that the Nation does not oppose this motion. This is the Defendant's second request for an enlargement of time to file its Opposition to Patton Boggs' Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment.

Dated this 8th day of May, 2006. Respectfully submitted, s/James M. Upton JAMES M. UPTON U.S. Department of Justice Environment & Natural Resources Division Natural Resources Section P. O. Box 663 Washington, D.C. 20044-0663 Tel. (202) 305-0482 Fax: (202) 305-0506

2