Free Probation Form 12 - District Court of Connecticut - Connecticut

Fw"' "2 ‘ Pa e 1 of 2
- Case 3:03-cr-00134-RNC Document 148 Filed 07/25/2007 g
_ UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT
U.S.A. vs. Pniup LAGANA - Docket No. 3:03CROO134(RNC)
PETITION ON PROBATION AND SUPERVISED RELEASE
COMES NOW, PROBATION OFFICER OF THE COURT, presenting an official report upon the conduct and attitude
of Philip Lagana who was sentenced to 366 days imprisonment for a violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1029(b)(2), Conspiracy to
Commit Fraud in Connection with Access Device, by the Honorable Robert N. Chatigny, Chief United States District Judge,
sitting in the court at Hartford, Connecticut on September 3, 2004 who fixed the period of supervision at 36 months which
commenced on December 30, 2004 and imposed the general terms and conditions theretofore adopted by the court: Special
conditions: 1) The defendant will work full time unless excused by the Probation Office for schooling, training, or other
acceptable reasons; 2) the defendant will pay restitution in the total amount of $48,570, jointly and severally with his
codefendants Randall Forcellina and Jennifer Forcellina. Restitution will be paid at the rate of $100 per month to Western
Union Financial Services, Attn: Mr. James Zink, Manager, Security and Investigation Division, 13022 Hollenberg Drive,
Bridgeton, MO 63044; 3) the defendant will participate in a program of mental health evaluation, counseling and treatment
under the direction of the Probation Office; the defendant will pay all, or a portion of, the costs associated with any such
treatment based on his ability to pay, in an amount to be determined by the Probation Office; 4) the defendant will not incur
new credit charges or open additional lines of credit without prior approval of the Probation Office unless he is in compliance
with the payment schedule; 5) the defendant will authorize the release to the Probation Office of any requested financial
information and, 6) the defendant will not possess or use any credit cards without advance approval of the Probation Office.
RESPECTFULLY PRESENTING PETITION FOR ACTION OF COURT AND FOR CAUSE AS FOLLOWS:
The defendant is being cited for violating the following conditions of supervised release:
Charge #1: Standard Condition - "The defendant shall not commit another federal state or local offense? The defendant was
arrested by the Bethel Police Department on July 13, 2007 based upon a felony warrant issued in Danbury Superior Court on
July 9, 2007. i—le is charged with Larceny in the First Degree, two counts of Forgery in the Second Degree and Identity Theft
in the First Degree. He was released on a $75,000 bond and scheduled to appear on July 24, 2007 at 9:30 a.m. at Danbury
Superior Court.
Charge #2: Standard Condition - "The defendant shall notify the probation officer within 72 hours of being arrested or
guestioned by a law enforcement officer." The defendant was stopped by Stamford, Connecticut Police on April 25, 2007 at
approximately 0200 hours while driving an infinity G35. The car was not registered and was towed from the scene, a ticket
was issued to the defendant and he failed to notify probation as required.
Charge #3: Standard Condition — "The defendant shall notify the probation officer within 72 hours of being arrested or
guestioned by a law enforcement officer." The defendant was contacted telephonically and questioned by Bethel Connecticut
Police Detective George Bryce on lvlay 25, 2007 was requested to meet with him regarding the investigation. The defendant
never notified the Probation Office of this contact
$ (See attached)
PRAYING THAT THE COURT WILL ORDER a warrant to issue with the period of supervision tolled, bringing the
defendant before the Court forthwithto answer charges that he violated the conditions of his supervision imposed bythe Court.
ORDER OF COURT _ Sworn to By Q- T
Considered and ordered this .'L’é "
day of July, 2007and ordered filed and made Otto Rothi
n mart of the records in the at;0~rt@se. _ United States Probation Officer
Place mix;/(/A
The Honorable Robert N. Chatigny - 7 .
Chief United States Dietriet Judge Date
Before me, the Honorable Robert N. Chatigny, Chief United States District Judge, on this2& day of July, 2007,at Har ord,
Connecticut, U.S. Probation Officer Otto Rothi appeared and under oath stated that the_facts set forth in this petitiorygf true
to the best of her knowledge and belief.
ThE n¤E
Chief United States District Ju ge

Case 3:03-cr-00134-RNC Document 148 Filed 07/25/2007 Page 2 of 2
Charge #4: Standard Condition - "The defendant shall report to the probation office and shall submit a truthful and complete
written report within the first five days of each month."
Charge #5: Standard Condition -"The defendant shall answer truthfully all inguirles by the probation officer and follow the
instructions of the probation officer." On May 31 and July 13, 2007 the defendant submitted monthly supervision reports and
marked the answer "no" as to whether he had been arrested or questioned by law enforcement. He also verbally responded,
"no" when asked on July 13, 2007 if he had had contact with law enforcement and failed to respond truthfully until presented
with evidence of this contact.