Free Reply to Response to Motion - District Court of Connecticut - Connecticut


File Size: 118.7 kB
Pages: 4
Date: December 31, 1969
File Format: PDF
State: Connecticut
Category: District Court of Connecticut
Author: unknown
Word Count: 472 Words, 2,690 Characters
Page Size: 613.44 x 792 pts
URL

https://www.findforms.com/pdf_files/ctd/22489/54-2.pdf

Download Reply to Response to Motion - District Court of Connecticut ( 118.7 kB)


Preview Reply to Response to Motion - District Court of Connecticut
Case 3:03-cv-00372-AVC Document 54-2 Filed O3/23/2007 Page 1 of 4
Exhrbnt A

Case 3:03-cv-OOSZ2-AVC Document 54-2 Filed O3/23/2007 Page 2 of 4 r
DOCKET N O. CV 04-40013}.98 : SUPERIOR COURT I
KELLY PHANEUF, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW
PLAINTIFF I : BRITAIN
g I V. I . : AT NEW BRITAIN
E ROSE MARIE CIPRIANO, DORENE M. :
E 5 FRAIKIN, KATHLEEN BHVKOWSKI, : _
ii , PLAINVILLE BOARD OF EDUCATION, 2
E g and TOWN OF PLAINVILLE, :
ga UUFENUANTS A ; AUcUsr 26, zoos
EE Qt “ ·
Eg · ‘ MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME g
§ Pursuant to Practice Book § 66-1 (a), the plaintiff in the above entitled matter hereby
é E moves for an extension of time up to and including September 27, 2005, within which to tile an
E >- ` .
cg D
Q 5 appeal, from the Court’s Memorandum of Decision on Motion for Summary Judgment filed on
t a · .
gg August 18, 2005. The plaintiff requests an extension of time to tile an appeal due to scheduling
o Z -
¤: E 7 _
Ei conflicts, in which p1aintif’r"s counsel will be unable to consult with the plaint.iJ':t` and/or tile said
ui
n , A g .
§§ appeal within the current deadline for tiling said appeal, namely, September 7, 2005. Accordingly,
Q; the plaintiE requests an extension of time in order to enable counsel with adequate time to consult
K
g with the plaintiff prior to proceeding with an appeal in this matter. _
ORAL ARGUMENT NOT REQUESTED -
TESTUVIONY NOT REQUIRED

Case 3:03-cv-OO37?2-AVC Document 54-2 ·Fi|ed O3/23/2007 Page 3 of 4 I
Undersigned counsel has spoken to defense counsel who objects to the instant request for
extension of time. 1 ` _ i
THE PLAINTIFF
Q KELLY PHANEUF _
Q § Sheila J. Hall
Lg Lawrence C. Sgrignari 0 l 0
gz; 7 . Gesmonde, Pietrosimone & Sgrignari, LLC
‘° 5 3127 Whitney Avenue
Q • ' y Hamden, Connecticut 06518
- j § Tel.: (203) 407-4200
Q _ Juris No. 022230
Q5 5 .
~= §
ts § · -
F; g ORDER .
E , `
Z
gg The foregoing motionhaving come before, it is hereby ORDERED:
Z .
E g ‘
E GRANTED / DENIED.
-
2
Q Judge/Clerk
U 2

ll Case 3:03-cv-00373-AVC Document 54-2 Filed O3/2;%/2007 Page 4 of 4
CERTIFICATION
This is to certify that a copy ofthe foregoing Motion for Efctension of Time was mailed,
C, postage prepaid, this 26m clay of August, 2005 to: g _
i James G. Williams, Esq.
fl Williams, Walsh & O’Connor, LLC
gg 110 Washington Avenue, Second Floor
j , North Haven, CT 06473
it C, -
g § Katy R. shaman? g
cig i 97 Tmmbull Avenue _ -
· *< 3 Plainville, CT 06062
gg L 'T$_~;§Q ,a-i_§La;·a_ all V ..__
gg I Sheila J. Hall { `
z E . ·
2 8 L -
8 g -
E ¤ I ` -
E E ‘
O LLl
E E
U 5: ,
-
E
é
3 I ,