Free Motion to Continue - District Court of Connecticut - Connecticut


File Size: 16.4 kB
Pages: 3
Date: December 31, 1969
File Format: PDF
State: Connecticut
Category: District Court of Connecticut
Author: unknown
Word Count: 464 Words, 2,825 Characters
Page Size: Letter (8 1/2" x 11")
URL

https://www.findforms.com/pdf_files/ctd/22497/29.pdf

Download Motion to Continue - District Court of Connecticut ( 16.4 kB)


Preview Motion to Continue - District Court of Connecticut
Case 3:03-cv-00380-SRU

Document 29

Filed 01/26/2004

Page 1 of 3

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT ARTHUR YEOMANS, JR. Plaintiff Vs. SANDRA E. WALLACE a/k/a SANDRA E. LUZZI, GEORGE T. LUZZI, DALE BRUMMOND, and TOWN OF STONINGTON Defendants : : : : : : : : : : : : :

CIVIL ACTION NO: 3:03 CV 0380(SRU)

JANUARY 23, 2004

MOTION FOR CONTINUANCE OF SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE A settlement conference is scheduled in the above case for January 29, 2004 at 10:00 a.m. As stated in a previous motion for continuance, the 80 year old plaintiff recently had a heart attack. It was hoped that he would be able to participate in a settlement conference in this time period. Counsel has been informed that plaintiff is still recuperating. In the mornings he must take medication which leave him both physically and mentally impaired for most of the morning. In the afternoons he is usually able to function acceptably. Unfortunately, the settlement conference is scheduled for the morning, and not all parties and counsel are available in the afternoon. The plaintiff, therefore, requests a continuance of the Settlement Conference. Plaintiff'counsel, after getting consent from counsel for the Town of Stonington (other s appearing counsel could not be reached) has discussed this with the court'clerk, and s

Case 3:03-cv-00380-SRU

Document 29

Filed 01/26/2004

Page 2 of 3

was told that the court was agreeable to the continuance and that the parties should work out another date. At the present time, the parties are still attempting to find a date when all counsel, parties, and special masters will be available. The plaintiff requests that the motion for continuance be granted, and that the parties be instructed to report back to the court when they have found a date for the meeting when all parties can be available. THE PLAINTIFF, ARTHUR YEOMANS, JR.

By______________________________ John C. Wirzbicki Fed. Bar No. ct05679 Brown Jacobson, P.C. P.O. Box 391, 22 Courthouse Square Norwich, CT 06360 Tel: (860) 889-3321

Case 3:03-cv-00380-SRU

Document 29

Filed 01/26/2004

Page 3 of 3

CERTIFICATION I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing Motion for Continuance of Settlement Conference was mailed, postage pre-paid, to all counsel and pro-se parties on record, on January 23, 2004 as follows: Mark A. Perkins, Esq. Thomas Murtha, Esq. Maher and Murtha, LLC 528 Clinton Avenue, P.O. Box 901 Bridgeport, CT 06601-0901 Steven T. Hartford, Esq. Capalbo, Capalbo & Hartford 67 High Street Westerly, RI 02891 Sandra E. Wallace, Pro Se 120 Liberty Street Pawcatuck, CT 03679 Special Master James J. Szerejko Halloran & Sage One Goodwin Sq., 225 Asylum Street Hartford, CT 06103 Special Master Thomas J. McHale 400 Orange Street New Haven, CT 06511 _______________________________ John C. Wirzbicki