Free Order on Motion for Extension of Time - District Court of Connecticut - Connecticut

I Wzgmm . » I
I case 3;0s-ev-003s%%RU Document 28 Filed O1Q¢52004 PaZ;§¢I3efB‘t§O mgx . I
I · I
I I
· I
I gt? F I L E D I
I T
ZIIIIII JAN -5 ID I2: gi I
. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT ~ I .. I
BRIDGIIPUIII CI? {
ARTHUR YEOMANS, JR. :
Plaintiff I CIVIL ACTION NO: , I
: 3:03 CV 0380(SRU) xl`? -
Vs. I I
SANDRA E. WALLACE alk/a I I
SANDRA E. LUZZI, GEORGE : I
T. LUZZI, DALE BRUMMUND, : I
and TOWN OF STONINGTON : JANUARY 5, 2004 I
Defendants I I
¤¤ I I
*0 I
[3 66 QN FOR EXTENSION OF TIME WITHIN WHICH TO RESPOND TO I
LU <1_DE ;EN DANTS’ FIRST SET OF INTERROGATORIES AND REQUEST FOR
*3;* PRODUCTION DATED DECEMBER 4 2003
._J 3 2-?§:·’
_ K [Lt- _; Plaintiff, ARTHUR YEOMANS, JR., hereby requests an extension of I
IH $··l `I my gf`
Q ,2 tcgie, tliéigugh and including January 22, 2004, within which to respond to the
Z U M ,..*:,3 com .
E J E First S°et of interrogatories and Requests for Production, dated December 4, I
gg I Z 2003, filed by defendants, DALE BRUMMUND and TOWN OF STONINGTON. I
·=¤: IJ .
S Ig EI As stated in previous motions to the court, the 80 year old plaintiff recently
gg __ Q had a heart attack and has been recuperating. Also, pIaintiff’s counsel has been
g Q na? away on a brief vacation. I
The attorney for the defendants Dale Brummund and Town of Stonington I
has been contacted and has indicated that he has no objection to the granting of
this motion. The undersigned certifies that this case has not been assigned for _
O trial. This is the first extension that has been requested for this purpose. I
I
I
BROWN JAcoBsoN Rc.
A'l"I`0RNEYS AT Lxw
22 COURTHOUSE SQUARE P.O. BOX 39I NORWICH, CONNECTICUT 0G360—O3QI
JURIS # 05537 {860) BBB-332l
I IIII