Free Order on Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply to Motion - District Court of Connecticut - Connecticut

, I —cv-00386-AWT Document 73 Filed 01 /06/2006 Page 1 of 1 i
lj » 0 2000 -
; g .//lll 3 A H, Z! , *
ted S 'C8. TLS S D Il. S tf ZJ- ct it ,
msrmcr or conrtmcrrcuxr A “ ‘ ° ‘~· A
_ EUNICE SMITH, : CIVIL ACTION . 3:03CV00386(AWT)
Plaintw : r .0
. STATE OF CONNECTICUT, .
DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION, : .
Defendant : December 29, 2005
X g ,,..
* MOTIBN _EXTEND PLAINTIFF’S TIME TO RESPOND TO DEFENDANT’S
M $3 1215
* `“` `”1”‘ _Q ?:2§Y1{{ ,
F _;_PursitajritLCto Rule 9(b)(1) of the Local Rules of Civil Procedure, Plaintiff hereby
~g§,;_ tig iiequegthatlthe·*deadline for Plaintiffs response to Defendant’s Motion for Summary
i? , _ i Judgment be extended for an additional twenty days, from December 30, 2005 t0
,§ ea _ I
~ V V , January 20, 2006. This extension of time is necessitated by: (1) the press of legal
4 ·`°=·°‘ business related to Summary Judgment responses on the following federal cases, Vickye
• ®· E _
,, Ward v. State of Connecticut, Department of Administrative Services
0 _' Q" I (304CVOl217MRK); Charles Lyte v. South Central Ct. Regional Water Authority
rx ` 7;* A .
. B t I (304CV0l244DJ S); as well as the writing of one Appellate brief and preparing for one
j` A 0 A . .
gz 5 Appellate argument, in the following cases of Femi Bogle-Assegai v. State of
T " 0 ? ? 2 · l`
X5 0 ,;; EQ Connecticut, Commission on Human Rights and Opportunities (302CVO2292HBF) and
p V " J . W Dr. Kuba Assegai v. Town of Bloomfield, (30lCVOl304SRU).
` , A J Cynthia R. Jennings, Esq.,
. · THE BARRISTER LAW GROUP, Lrc.,
211 State Street, 2“" Floor ~ Bridgeport ~ CT 06604
. . ra; zos-ss4-4800 ~ rat; zos-ses-was
A Federal Bar No. CT2l797