A case 3:03-cv-OO4%CFD D¤cument18 Filed 02/
\\5{j UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT % FQ Fm
DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT Jtmg&’@§
_ I
PAUL SANGALLI, . U Amykmw I
I b D 2;
Plaintiff, : (js , M
: l `
v. : CIVIL NO. 3:03CV%%QDEQRBIQT T
: ° I
Jo1—1N ASHGROFT ; (jaw"` 1
ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE :
UNITED STATES, UNITED STATES :
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE :
’ I
Defendant. : January 8, 2004 }
·c¤ I ·
§ I 1 _ I
E; ` ` JOINT MOTION FOR EQTENSION OF TIME
Q It
ig: e
2: g*~ The parties hereby requests the following limited
\
é HA- Ergdification of the pre—trial-deadlines. Specifically, the
@` MQ .
%“' ·%%%§rties request that scheduling order be modified as follows:
Q ·•-a
E Ilga positions of expert witnesses must be completed by June I5,
C5 uw
t 2004 and dispositive motions are due August l, 2004. This is the I
first extension sought of the foregoing deadlines. The extension
.in" Q I
isynecessanyifor the following reasons:
_.·_
I j.IZS_?TL_1fI18IglI'1 @1'1dOI`S€ITl€I1IZ of CDG p€;1lf*Cj.€S proposed Form
"- · I I
Q2€(fLY]the~Qburt ordered that expert reports would be due by
ApriI§30QI2004. This date, however, is unworkable when read in
conjunction with the other dates provided for in the approved
Form 26(f). For example, the deadline for dispositive motions is
also April 30, 2004. lf expert reports are disclosed on April
n 30, 2004, the parties will need time after the disclosure of the
r_rrrrrrrrrrLrr IIIC I
“t_v—r·c—~—- as I —-- I --. I I _- ..I. ....I `_.I .II. .... Q IIII Q Q. ..;; -Q Q.,..
â€D_“v—e—~—e I ——- at I I I --. --_ 4 IIII Q .... Q
United States Free Forms
Canada Free Forms
United Kingdom Free Forms
Australia Free Forms