Free Motion for Extension of Time - District Court of Connecticut - Connecticut


File Size: 60.3 kB
Pages: 2
Date: January 16, 2004
File Format: PDF
State: Connecticut
Category: District Court of Connecticut
Author: unknown
Word Count: 375 Words, 2,247 Characters
Page Size: 612.72 x 1008 pts
URL

https://www.findforms.com/pdf_files/ctd/22520/16.pdf

Download Motion for Extension of Time - District Court of Connecticut ( 60.3 kB)


Preview Motion for Extension of Time - District Court of Connecticut
K ' Case 3:03-cv-00403-CFD Document 16 Filed O1/1§/2004 Page 1 of 2 V
» ' ~ O O
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT §§.g mm
DISTRICT or CONNECTICUT G
` I
AUL SANGALLI, : Am
: IJJAN fb pp 2: OO
Plaintiff, : [LS D, _
: :StRlCT()gURT
v. : CIVIL No. 3: 03cv ’0Q00Q} OHN ASHCROFT I Q -
TTORNEY GENERAL OF THE :
NITED STATES, UNITED STATES :
EPARTMENT OF JUSTICE :
4 Defendant. Q January 8, 2004
JOINT MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME
The parties hereby requests the following limited
odification of the pre—trial deadlines. Specifically, the
arties request that scheduling order be modified as follows:
epositions of expert witnesses must be completed by June 15, I
004 and dispositive motions are due August l, 2004. This is the` I
'irst extension sought of the foregoing deadlines. The extension E
's necessary for the following reasons: i
= l
In its margin endorsement of the parties proposed Form
6(f), the Court ordered that expert reports would be due by
pril 30, 2004. This date, however, is unworkable when read in
onjunction with the other dates provided for in the approved
orm 26(f). For example, the deadline for dispositive motions is
lso April 30, 2004. If expert reports are disclosed on April
n 30, 2004, the parties will need time after the disclosure of the
` l
_____________m_,,_i_,iI ..I. Ii
_y_y_y_y
i L; _ i - i - i - i - i - 7 - rr - 7

t- I
¢ ` . Case 3:03-cv-004835CFD Document 16 Filed O1/€6j2004 Page 2 of 2 '
eport/s to depose the experts. They will, moreover, need time
o prepare and file dispositive motions, if appropriate. For
he reasons set forth herein, the parties respectfully suggest.
hat there is good cause for granting limited modifications and (
(
(
xtensions sought herein. T
espectfully submitted,
OR THE PLAINTIFF, FOR THE DEFENDANT,
l KEVIN J. O'CONNOR
· UNITED STATES ATTORNEY
_ . JOHN . HUGHES
` { CHI CIVIL DIVISION
-AMUEL RI ZITELLI, JR. ATRICK CARUSO
6 PRINDLE AVE. ASSISTANT UNITED STATES ATTORNEY
ERBY, CT 06418 P.O. BOX 1824
(203)736—9800 I NEW HAVEN, CT 06508
( _EDERAL BAR NO. ct20079 (203) 821-3700
( ` (203) 773—5373 facsimile
( I FEDERAL BAR NO. ct17984
( i
I :\pcamso\Sangalli\Extcnsion010804.wpd
( l ‘ _ .
( ;
(
(
( ( (
( (