Free Memorandum in Opposition to Motion - District Court of Connecticut - Connecticut

i [ Case 3:03-cv-00407-JCH Document 45 Filed 12/24/2003 Page 1 of 3
O O I
I UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
I ’ * ‘ ‘ ‘ J . E
I DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT . ' 1 ` . l
PRISONER »?»"{!"j ,_ I
l ANGEL cABALLERo ; own. NO. 3;03cv40v-~ ~ CH)(HBl&l) 2 ‘ =-<= U 8 l
] ..'¢[· ,·*
V. : l
“ JOHN ARMSTRONG, ET AL. : DECEMBER 23, 2003
MEMORANDUM IN OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFF’S l
MOTION TO COMPEL DISCOVERY i
For all the reasons set forth in the attached letter sent to plaintiff on or about November
13, 2003, defendants respectfully obj ect to plaintiffs motion to compel ii1rther responses
by defendant Myers as to plaintiffs first requests for admission.
DEFENDANTS
, John Armstrong, et al. l
RICHARD BLUMENTHAL N
ATTORNEY GENERAL 1
2* l
BY: . y
E. Lynch I ` i
Assistant Attorne eral
110 Sherman Stre
Hartford, CT 06105
Tel: (860) 808-5450
Federal Bar #ct08326
E-Mail: ann.l)[email protected] j
I
I E

l
1
l
1

l ~ , ` · l
I Case 3:03-cv-OO4O7C1%H Document 45 Filed 12/24€%O3 Page 2 of 3
l CERTIFICATION J
{ Mereby certify that a copy of the foregoing was mailed to the following this g
N Q ( ay of December, 2003: i
Angel Caballero #214362 E
Northern Correctional Institution `
287 Bilton Road g
Somers, CT 06071 l
Ann E. Lynch
Assistant Atto General
l
l
i

l
l

‘ · , I
l ` ' ' ‘ _ l
0 · - - 07 J H D · Filed 12/24/2003 Page 3 of 3
` Case 3.03 cv 004 < .·’ ocume 6% KJ 7
. so -2.. "%¤ i
0 RICHARD BLUMZENTHAL g MacKenzie Hsu 4
ATTORNEY GENERAL E, F KQ - 110 Sherman Stmet
O, céiqsé-· H¤rli`01*d, CT 06105-2294
. 1
l Oiliee of The Attorney General
l State of Connecticut at rmiwmm Z
me {860) 808-5591
November 13, 2003
D
Angel Caballero, Inmate No. 214362 -
Northern Correctional Institution l
‘ 287 Bilton Road, PO Box 665
Somers, CT 06071 _ - - _ - l
Re: Caballero vs. Armstrong, et al. t _
3:03CV407(JCH)(HBF) r
Dear Mr. Caballero: _ . H
I » I am in receipt of your November 4, 2003 letter. Quite simply, Mr. Myers’ responses
were the best he could do. You asked him to admit the authenticity of documents that were not l
addressed to him or authored by him. The best he could do was state that these documents
"appeared" to be what you represented them to be. This is the most that can be expected under t
the circumstances. ` N
Very truly yours, 4, .
Assistan orney General
AEL:lac