Free Order - District Court of Connecticut - Connecticut

Case 3:03-cv-00407-JCH Document 36 Filed 12/08/2003L[OWa6e¤.{9é*féI(.·€r’2) I
l
E
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT E H ‘‘‘‘‘‘ `
DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT I *~ · ··T·· L ’
_ ZHU3 {iii) -—E ii?) 2= I8 i
Angel Caballero, Jr. Q PRISQNER .
v. : Case No.3:G®cvAQ7(JCH)(HBF)
John Armstrong, et al E
ORDER OF NOTICE TO PRO SE LITIGANT · i
On ll/25/O3, the defendants filed a motion to dismiss. Rule i
7(a), D. Conn. L. Civ. R., requires plaintiff to file his
response to the motion within twenty—one days from the date the
motion was filed.
The court hereby gives express notice to the pgg gg
plaintiff that “failure to submit a memorandum in opposition to
[the] motion may be deemed sufficient cause to grant the motion, I
except where the pleadings provide sufficient cause to deny the
motion.” Rule 7(a), D. Conn. Loc. Civ. P., and that if plaintiff
fails to file his opposition to the motion to dismiss or fails to g
obtain an extension of time for filing his opposition within I
twenty—one days from the day the motion was filed, the
defendants’ motion may be granted at that time.
If after full review of the unopposed motion and the I
complaint, dismissal is warranted, the motion to dismiss will be
granted, the complaint will be dismissed and the case will be
closed. ;
i
BY ORDER OF THE COURT
KEVIN E. ROWE, CLERK
i
I