Free Motion for Extension of Time - District Court of Connecticut - Connecticut

. · ‘ ase 3:03-cv-OO41€5CD Document 24 Filed O4/2@Olj Page 1 of 2
‘ UNITED STATES DISTRICT CO ’ j _____
· l DISTRICTOF CONNEC'I`ICM _K I.? iglj
Ll. ‘ €.>l§~`LT`§-iii L" fZC·l.'¥< *` E
SEC A P ; cass NUM =t §§6§*ri**v*2i$t§t(i>co)
VS. ; j I
GLOBAL TELECOM SERVICES, LLC : APRIL 22 200
ET AL ’ I {
|
AMENDED MOTION FOR EXTENSION O E TIME RE:
DEFENDANT’S MEMORANDUM IN OPP • .. ITION TO '
PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR SUMARY J DGMENT
The defendants, Global Telecom Services, LLC and A |•ert LaTouche, hereby move `
this Honorable Court for a forty-tive (45) day extension to Ma 17, 2004 in which to file a
memorandum in opposition to the plaintiffs motion for summ judgment. ln support of
this motion the defendants assert the following: |
1. The plaintiffs tiled a motion for summary judgment o !· April 1, 2004. The motion
and accompanying documents is approximately '5 inches thick. l j
2. During the month of April, 2004, defense counsel wa preparing for a murder trial ,
which was scheduled to begin jury selection on April 27, 200 . (State v Cartonio Mims, Q
Docket No. CR02—ll5260) However, on Thursday, April 15 2004, the defendant in the
murder trial entered a guilty plea to a substituted charge which o viated the need for a trial.
3. Aside from the instant memorandum in opposition to ummary judgment, defense
counsel has two other motions for summary judgment which h must respond to; the first is K
due on April 19, 2004, and the other is due on May 3, 2004.
4. Counsel for the defendant has notified the plaintiff conc-·rning this request for an
extension and they raise no objection. However, the plaintiffs a quiescence is contingent on
them having 10 days in which to respond to the defendant’s me orandum.
Wherefore, the defendants move that this motion for exten on of time be granted.
l
l
l
l
, I

· ·’ ‘ eee 3;o3-ev-oo41@CD Document 24 Filed O4/2€/50 II Page 2 of 2
I
Respectfull submitted,
The Defe t
I I I
I ‘ II I Irl I I
I e II I I
Byr ‘* I
William . Paetz d
Moriarty Paetzol & Babcock
140 Heb n Avenue, Suite 102
· I Giastonb , CT 06033
Tel No: IZ60)657-1010
Federal ar No.: ct10074
CERTIFICATION I I
THIS IS TO CERTIFY that a copy of the foregoing amen ed motion for extension was
mailed to the following counsel of record on this 22nd day of •I il, 2004:
I
Jonathon J. Einhorn, Esq.
Attorney for Salvatore Cartelli I
412 Orange Street I
New Haven, CT 06511
ssc I
William Finkel, Esq. I
233 Broadway
New York, NY 10279 } I I
TIL Il IL I
E IIIIIII
William H. aeaeid ' I
I
. I
_______I
I
- I
I I
I I I
I I I
I | I
I I I I
I I I
I I
I I
I I
I I I
I