Free Order on Motion for Extension of Time - District Court of Connecticut - Connecticut

I ;=;‘%-=;» __ _ __ I
I W ‘4-· t I @ " ’* ` *'** -- ; I_II, ., ,;.,4 ._ . _=_, _ i I
‘s · ‘- - · ’‘‘‘‘`‘ ‘ ‘ ·‘;· ; I_ `’’` ‘ @ * . ¤ - - ```' l ll 'nlk I I
I at; ·r=< ··¤ I
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT E W I-(-I I
· DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT ¤—» I.-I -—¤ . I
‘ 9 =¢;? "-ER I»~ I
···——— 2;.2; .:.*5 -I/‘ I I
‘ -··~ (..:9 . gj I
IQ ig SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION NO. 3:03 CV 418 (PCD) ' I
Q-IQ Plaintiff, I
VS.
Q GLOBAL TELECOM SERVICES, L.L.C. dfbla E
%_ MEDICAL DISPOSAL DEVICES,
{(,5 AI BERT D. LATOUCHE AND SALVATORE J. I
A , ITELLI, JR., I
·~I·@ Defendants OCTOBER 9, 2003 I
\§ MOTION TO EXTEND SCHEDULING ORDER I
I A I
¤x
Qs
» Defendant, Salvatore J. Cartelli, Jr., represents as follows:
I
3 x 1. That the undersigned has just tiled an appearance for the Defendant,
\`<
__\ Q vatore J. Cartelli, Jr. in this matter. I
{ I
F 2. That a scheduling order had been agreed to previously which is no longer I
A
xg E adequate, based upon Defendants new representation. I
I
\ - Q _ 3. The plaintiff has agreed that the discovery deadlines may be extended an I
{ Q-
It Ig additional 90 days, as appropriate.
§\ N
. Q __ 4. Attorney for the co-Defendant, William Paetzold has no objection to this
,. ,. I
§ request. I
Nt. I
Q Qi WHEREFORE, the Defendant, Salvatore J. Cartelli, Jr., requests a 90- day
"** ;T‘¤ extension on the scheduling.
Q w » I I
"<_ JQ THE D FENDANT I
I‘\ 3 It SALV ORE . CATELLI, JR.
‘·- R3 g it? I
\$ is ¤ ;.—· I
ev I I
Rkg LLI Ii; JQNAT AN J. INHORN -
% ___g .1;, gi 41*2 O ANGE I
—·~— .£.?QL}1§ NEQHAVEN, CT 06511 I
I-I4 2 ei; T NO. (203) 777-3777 I
I ,_ ~·» CT BAR 00163/JNI—[email protected] I
;.—§ ‘ I
I