Free Motion for Extension of Time - District Court of Connecticut - Connecticut


File Size: 106.5 kB
Pages: 4
Date: January 29, 2004
File Format: PDF
State: Connecticut
Category: District Court of Connecticut
Author: unknown
Word Count: 853 Words, 5,157 Characters
Page Size: 612.72 x 1008 pts
URL

https://www.findforms.com/pdf_files/ctd/22865/36.pdf

Download Motion for Extension of Time - District Court of Connecticut ( 106.5 kB)


Preview Motion for Extension of Time - District Court of Connecticut
N Case 3:03-cv—OO93§iW|G Document 36 Filed O1/28/2004 Paget of 4
, if i EEEZ N
E
Zlllllt Jllli 28 P 3* Oil N
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT _ _, _,, __ __ , .
FOR THE t1:Ii__[__g g_; I A I N
DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT rei. I it F, . T
SAMMIE ooss I cAsE No. 03-cvsss (wie) N
PLAINTIFF
l
vs. r
FAIRFIELD HOUSING AUTIIoRITY, ET I N
AL. |
DEFENDANTS
, JANUARY 27, 2004
MOTION FoR ENLARGEMENT OF TIME N
!

The defendants, Fairfield Housing Authority, Charles Feld, Marilyn McNee, and David N
Belcher ("Defendants”), hereby move for an enlargement of time in which to file an answer and N
affirmative defenses and/or otherwise respond to the Complaint filed by the pro se plaintifli
Sammie Goss ("Plaintiff’). In support of this motion the Defendants represent the following:
l. The Plaintifti who is proceeding in forma pauperis, attempted service by mail
I
pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 4, with a request for waiver of service dated July 9, 2003. These N
Defendants waived service within the time set forth in the request for waiver.
N
1
J

_ Case 3:03-cv-00965:5/VIG Document 36 Filed O1/$3004 Page 2 of 4 l

l
l
2. The undersigned counsel appeared by notice dated August 27, 2003, which was I
l
filed in Court on August 28, 2003. The handwritten complaint as it now stands was drafted and l
filed by the pro se Plaintiff, however, and is not easily amenable to response or motion.
3. The case has been referred to Judge Garfinkel for all purposes. _
4. At a status conference before Judge Garfinkel on November 3, 2003, the Plaintiff 3
represented that she had spoken to attorney Edwin Farrow, who would be entering an I
appearance after his admission to practice before the United States District Court for the District
of Connecticut. Attorney Farrow did not enter an appearance on behalf of the Plaintiff, and a R
Scheduling Conference in Court subsequently scheduled for January 20, 2004 was cancelled. l l Z
5. By e—mail hom the Court on January 22, 2004, the parties were notined that E
Judge Garfinkle had appointed Attorney Damon Kirschbaum pro bono counsel for the Plaintiff I
and that a conference would be scheduled on February 3 or 5, 2004. Subsequent ie-mai
indicated that the conference was tentatively scheduled for February 5, 2004. l an
6. The undersigned spoke to Attorney Kirschbaum by telephone on January 27,
2004, and he confirmed that he would be entering his appearance and reviewing the Complaint-
7. These Defendants have previously moved for an extension of time to file an
answer and defenses so that counsel could appear for the Plaintiff and review the complaint to
- 1
determined whether to file an amended complaint. _ q _
8. Pursuant to Loc. R. Civ. P. 7(b), the undersigned counsel states that he discussed
the need for an enlargement of time in light of Attorney Kirschbaunfs appointment and I
J
' _ -_-`°`°— ”“—*“—.t-T)i

I
Case 3:03-cv-OO93§-I/VIG Document 36 Filed O1/23[2004 Page 3 of 4 Y
‘ ‘ ty I. U) I
imminent appearance, and that Attorney Kirschbaum has consented to this Motion. In addition, I
the undersigned on this date also telephoned Assistant U.S. Attorney Douglas Morabito, who
represents the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development ("I-IUD"), and
who stated that he consents to this motion. The undersigned also telephoned the pro se Plaintiff
to inform her of the filing of this Motion, and left a voice mail message. As of the filing of this
. I
Motion, the undersigned is aware of no objection. I
8. Pursuant to Loc. R. Civ. P. 7(b), the undersigned states that this is the
—· t
Defendants’ sixth motion for enlargement of time to file an answer and affirmative defenses or
otherwise respond to the Plaintiffs complaint.
WHEREFORE, the Defendants request that this Motion be granted and that the time to
tile an answer and defenses and/or otherwise respond to the complaint be extended 20 days from I
the date of the Court Conference on February 5, that -is, February 25, 2004. ;
I
THE DEFENDANTS
FAIRFIELD HOUSING AUTHORITY, CHARLES I
FELD, MARILYN MCNEE, AND DAVID
BELCHER I
Bw
atthew M. ausman (ct 08966)
Pullman & Comley, LLC
850 Main Street, P.O. Box 7006 I
Bridgeport, CT 06601-7006
Telephone (203) 330-2000
Facsimile (203) 576-8888

I
I
I
I
3 I
I
I
. I
I

';""*"_ ··——·-·-—
4 Case 3:03-cv—OO9C35·\§VIG Document 36 Filed O1/23/25004 Page 4 of 4 I
` " ( .- 4
4 ·~‘” . 4
4 !
4 4
4
CERTIFICATION
Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. Rule 5 (b), I hereby certify that a copy of the above was
mailed on January 27, 2004 to all counsel and pro se parties of record. E
For the plaintiff SAMMIE GOSS: U 4
Samrnie Goss, Pro Se
I0 Ridgeley Avenue 4
Fairfield, CT 06825 4
Douglas P. Morabito, Esq. 4
U.S. Attorney’s Office _
l57 Church Street, 23rd Floor
New Haven, CT 06510
Damon A. R. Kirschbaum, Esq. 4
Attorney at Law
P.O. Box 300
Colchester, CT 06415
I 4
/ -- 1
/ v
I Ma e ‘ . Hausman (ct80966)
BPRT/58710.5/MXH/505395vl
4
4
4