Free Order on Motion for Extension of Time - District Court of Connecticut - Connecticut

1 i_' \
1
=· ¤ -1, Case 3:03-cv—OO935-W|® Document 28 Filed 11/17/200g) Page 1 of 1
1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
I DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT 1
_ I SQFMIE GOSS, ET AL. : N
V1 \ 1
1 3: i [ PLAINTIFFS, : CIV.NO. 3:O3cv935(RNC) _
1 E T11 1
E li FAIRFIELD HOUSING 1 *i§3;,i>%_ 1
§§; AUTHORITY, ET AL. : OCTOBER 14, 2003 Qjgg .-·. {B afi 1
1 ’ c$Q3 ·~ iw? 1
’é DEFENDANTS. : @§h` X5 img i
<1? 15 |
(I ‘·· .
1 Lg MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME ”1§i fj ‘
‘"` 1
y ~{éD 1 D {
y é Pursuant to Local Rule 7(b) of the Local Rules of Civil
gg S; Procedure for the District of Connecticut, the United States of 1
(ug
' g America, on behalf of the defendant, Betty Jones, hereby requests !
i_ that the Court grant an additional extension of time of thirty
(30) days, from October 16, 2003, up to and including November
.¤ , 1
5 17, 2003~to{§ile a an answer or other responsive pleading to the
1 it f*»‘TlY1Q;§ 1
gg p§%§ntiff’sacomplaint with the Court. The defendant requests an 5
` e
§ F; e;g§nsi5h ogftime so that she may formulate an appropriate !
{£3 p wie I
" 23 needed tb cgnfer with agency counsel regarding the plaintiff’s
-1 § complaint. _ é
`
3Q This is the second motion to extend this time limitation.
i@ The undersigned attempted to reach the plaintiff by telephone but 1
\\—) as of the time of the filing of this motion no response has been
1
received by the plaintiff. In addition, the parties have a 1
status conference scheduled before Judge Garfinkel on November 3,

I 1
I
I 1