Free Motion for Extension of Time - District Court of Connecticut - Connecticut

N Case 3:03-cv-00955CD Document 20 Filed O1/20/2004 Page1 of 3 Q
l I l
L; ‘ Q 5;- e e
; ‘... ~ {
<> UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURTF {_ iQ;
DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT lf? yl M
ei- pp
MACGREGOR ROBINSON and :
GUY PETERSON, ; I
co—executors, : l
= N
Plaintiffs, : CIVIL ACTION NO. l
: 3:03—CV—950 (PCD) `
V . ; {
BELMORE H. BROWNE and : I
ISABEL BROWNE DRISCOLL, : g
Defendants. : JANUARY 16, 2004
MOTION FOR ENLARGEMENT OF MEDIATION PERIOD, I
FOR EXTENSION OF SCHEDULING ORDER
AND TO POSTPONE SETTLEMENT/STATUS CONFERENCE
{ With the consent and support of the plaintiffs, the
defendants respectfully move that the court postpone the \
l
February 6, 2004 status/settlement conference and extend the ‘
February I6, 2004 reporting deadline contained in the Amended I
Scheduling Order to March 19, 2004 so that the parties may
complete their on—going and good faith attempts to resolve this
case by way of mediation.
<> g I
Lvucu, TEAUE, KEEFE AND ERRANTE, P. c. ATTORNEYS AT LAW l
sz Tnumauni STREET P.o.aox1a1z NEW Hman, CONNECTICUT 06508-1612 I
TELE¤H¤NE(2oe>va?-oars FACSMMLE(203)7B2-0278 3
W:\20000—20499\20]20 B. Bnc>w1~m`\001 Ronmsom v.BRowNE\Mor1oN Exmwn Tmza mz PT l-—16—04 .r>oc i
-1- 1
[ I
I
I
I 2
i Q
l E
I E
i
r a

{ E
E i
l
l :

I IT_“`—"`F"—`I
y - - Case 3:03-cv-OOQEQFCD Document 20 Filed 01/2g)€004 Page 2 of 3 )
I I
I I
I
N I
I <> The parties have already completed two lengthy private I
mediations sessions before Probate Judge Robert Killian during I
which they resolved some issues and narrowed many others. The
parties are attempting to resolve the balance of their disputes }
through on—going negotiations with the assistance of Judge U
Killian and remain cautiously optimistic in that regard. The
defendants will be conducting three site inspections in
February, after which the parties plan to submit to a third and I
final mediation session. Following the final mediation session,
I
and assuming success, the parties will need to draft a
comprehensive settlement agreement. g
I
lf the parties are unsuccessful in reaching a final and X
global settlement by March l9, 2004, a settlement/status
conference with the Court’s parajudicial officer would be I
helpful in defining the scope of the remaining discovery. E I
Respectfully submitted,
THE DEFENDANTS , '
BY = -l_
Enic P. SMITH, =-•_
ctisili
<> I
I
LYNCH, TRAUB, KEEFE AND ERRANTE, P. C. ATTORNEYS AT LAW
52 TRUMBULL STREET P.O. BOX 1612 NEW HAVEN, CONNECTICUT 06506-1612
TELEPHONE (203) YB?-0275 FACSIMILE (203) 782-0278
W:\20000—20¤199\20120 B. BaowNs\001 Romwsou V.BROWNE\MOTION EXTIZND Tms as PT 1-16-0¢1.ooc
-2...
I A
I
I a
I
I
I E
I
I E
I

I
I 2
I ;
I E
I

. . Case 3:03-cv-0O95Q?5CD Document 20 Filed 01/20[2004 Page 3 of 3 r
l .
{ ~ Q I
O CERTIFICATION or SERVICE `
I A copy of the foregoing motion was served by first class
I mail, postage prepaid, on January 16, 2004 to all counsel of
\ record as follows:
I Barbara S. Miller, Esq.
I Brophy, Wilkinson & Ober V
2507 Post Road
Southport, CT 06490
l I
-—--mm.- I
Eric P. Smi tl6l4l I
{ I
{
I
<> I
I
Lvwcu, TRAUB, KEEFE AND ERRANTE, P. c. ATToRI~IEYs AT LAW
52 TRUNIBULL. STREET P.O. BOX 1612 NEW HAVEN, CONNECTICUT 06506-1612
TELEPHONE (203) 787-0275 FACSIMILE (203) 782-0275
I»—J:\20000—20499\20}.2O IB. Bn·>I·mI;\00l Eloruwsors v,B1<·m·;II¤ 'L‘::-In IIE PT l—'L6—04 .I»~Ic
.. 3 .. \
I ,

I
R I
I ( I