Free Motion for Extension of Time - District Court of Connecticut - Connecticut


File Size: 58.6 kB
Pages: 3
Date: December 15, 2003
File Format: PDF
State: Connecticut
Category: District Court of Connecticut
Author: unknown
Word Count: 481 Words, 2,943 Characters
Page Size: 612.72 x 1008 pts
URL

https://www.findforms.com/pdf_files/ctd/22880/18.pdf

Download Motion for Extension of Time - District Court of Connecticut ( 58.6 kB)


Preview Motion for Extension of Time - District Court of Connecticut
`A>)""
Case 3:03-cv-009@PCD Document 18 Filed 12/12/2003 Page 1 of 3 {
= T- (U)
._ I _ I
, ,` !·~ ET} I
iZiEa;· if I. _
I: D I " sj __;f»‘
O UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT ~g?n¢’j ,~
DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT ""°**Uu;QW ’1`
MACGREGOR ROBINSON and : I
GUY PETERSON, :
co—executors, :
Plaintiffs, - : CIVIL ACTION NO.
: 3:03-CV-950 (PCD) 1
_ V. :
BELMORE H. BROWNE and ;
ISABEL BROWNE DRISCOLL, :
Defendants. : DECEMBER ll, 2003
MOTION TO POSTPONE ’ i
SETTLEMENT/STATUS CONFERENCE {
With the consent and support of the plaintiffs, the
defendants respectfully move that the court postpone the January l
9, 2004 status/settlement conference for just a short time so Q
that the parties may complete their attempts to resolve this 5
case by way of mediation.
Pursuant to the Court’s November 17, 2003 order denying the
November 7 Motion to Extend Time to Complete Discovery, the N E
E
<>
L
ummTmwx&mm¤&mmEne mmmwmwmw Y
sz Taumaunsmm »=.o.B¤x 1612 NEwHAv¤N,c¤~NecT¤cuT 06506-1612 g
TELEPHONEt203)787—0275 FACSWMLEIZOEJTBZ-0278
w;\2G000»20499\20120 B. BEo1·mE\001 Romusou v.Bn0wwE\M0T1ou Ex·rEN¤ TIME RE PT 12—;L1--03 .m<>c
1 -]_- I
_,,,_ ____ ________--_ ...... UN

l Case 3:03-cv-OOQQFCD Document 18 Filed 12/l2?OO3 Page 2 of 3 I
` ` ~
K l
l 1 J F
<> parties have selected a private mediator (Beverly Hodgson,
former judge of the Superior Court) and scheduled two mediations
sessions: January 6 and January ld. If the parties are
unsuccessful in reaching a settlement by the conclusion of
January 14, a settlement/status conference with the Court's
parajudicial officer would be helpful shortly thereafter because
the mediation proceedings should narrow the issues and assist
the parties in defining the scope of the remaining discovery.
Respectfully submitted,
THE DEFENDANTS,
BY: (fgijj
ERIC P. SMITH, .
Ctl6l4l
E
i
<>
LYNCH. TRAUB, KEEFE AND ERRANTE, P. c. ATTORNEYS AT LAW
52 TRUMBULL STREET 1=.c>. sox 1612 NEW HAVEN, CONNECTICUT 06506-1612
TELEPHONE (203) T6?-02Ts v=Acsu1.1n1.E (203) T62-0216 y
W:\2000O—20499\20120 B. Bnowm;\001 Ronmson V.BROWNB\MOTION Exwnzwn TIME: as PT 12-11-03.1:0c 1
..2... V

H
Y Case 3:03-cv-OO95(0q?CD Document 18 Filed 12/E2/2003 Page 3 of 3 i
i <> I
0 A copy of the foregoing motion was served by first class ;
mail, postage prepaid, on December ll, 2003 to all counsel of
record as follows:
Barbara S. Miller, Esq.
Brophy, Wilkinson & Ober
2507 Post Road
Southport, CT 06490
Eric P. Smith c 141 1
1
l
N
l
0 1
l l
} i
LYNc1-1, TRAUB, KEEFE Aran ERRANTE, P. c. Avronmzvs AT LAW i i
52 Tnumsuu. STREET 1¤.o. sox 1612 NEwHAVEN,CONNECT1CUT 06506-1512
TELEPHONE (203) 787-0275 FACSIMILE (203} 782-0278
W:\20000-20499\20l20 B. Bnovmn:\001 Ronxwsou V.BROWNE\MOTION Exwtwn TIME as PT 12-11-03.noc
-3-
BW_____________________________________________________________________mm*_p--A