I Case 3:03-cv-00970-PCD Document 14 Filed O2/18/2004 Page 1 of 1 I
1
I
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT w,_ i
DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT I~g§_ -·== @$5] I
. 1_1., C __, _ I
Martin Dickinson E PRI;g§§§UIé?’A mxgm I
v. : Case No. 3:O@cv9TQ(PCD)(JGM) F
Keith Scott, et al : y$yiV i ,
: ... I
ORDER OF NOTICE TO PRO SE LITIGANT I
On 2/II/O4, the defendants filed a motion to dismiss. Rule
7(a), D. Conn. L. Civ. R., requires plaintiff to file his .
response to the motion within twenty—one days from the date the I
motion was filed. i
The court hereby gives express notice to the prg ge Q
plaintiff that “failure to submit a memorandum in opposition to
[the] motion may be deemed sufficient cause to grant the motion,
except where the pleadings provide sufficient cause to deny the
motion.†Rule 7(a), D. Conn. Loc. Civ. P., and that if plaintiff I
fails to file his opposition to the motion to dismiss or fails to I
obtain an extension of time for filing his opposition within I
twenty—one days from the day the motion was filed, the
defendants’ motion may be granted at that time. I
If after full review of the unopposed motion and the I
complaint, dismissal is warranted, the motion to dismiss will be I
granted, the complaint will be dismissed and the case will be I
closed. I
BY ORDER OF THE COURT I
KEVIN F. ROWE, CLERK I
W
V*%5—Diww—W_¥§—W_DD—D_k§—D_D`—D_DWEDF?DEa_?*%D_Y*%5—V*wa-?*D5—?*â€"D""I""I_t"tiirr¤
E**fIZZZ:It:Z;iiIZZZZIIIIIij:Z;iIiiiiii___â€MH“—_——______â€â€œm____——___—mh___——____
_%§—W_kj—D_g"D_?i`D_%i`j_Dh¥5_D*na—i*D5—?*%5—D_kD`?_D5—D_?"D_?"`_T"`_U"`—v*vt—irrr·