Free Order on Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply to Motion - District Court of Connecticut - Connecticut

IT Z'T"`TTTT‘T;"‘ “““—’_““`“”_"‘—‘“‘*;——‘"r"·—*·—rrv——·r—··
I ‘ Case 3:03-cv—OO9®WIG Document 87 Filed 07/O&%OO4 Pé@1/@09/rJ¤J—· I
F I I., 0
ZIIUII JUN 30 I3 3= 20
ILS. DISTRICT COUI:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT f2I¤g|nr;IjpnRr, gn ;=.;; gT
DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT
THOMAS MATYASOVSZKY, ETAL. on :
, behalf of themselves and all others similarly :
situated, :
_ oo Plaintiff] : CIVIL ACTION O.
T : 3:03 CV 968 (WIG)
my it aésis ;
LII D. fj Ir? , .
` &I§IUS·I?I=~IG JQITTHORITY OF THE CITY :
Z ET AL. : JUNE 29, 2004
u_ :—’?¤ Fiii ESL Defendants. : .
g 5. VIII? I
` PE¤:`I\INTIFF’S MOTION FOR AN EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND I
DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS COUNT V
_ U,. Plaintiff and intevenor plaintiffs hereby move the Court to extend until July 2, I
m ` lm I I
ns.: .
§5§ 2.004 the date by which plaintiffs must respond to Defendants Motion to Dismiss I
-
Y.
g 3 Count V of pl_aintiffs’ amended complaint. This three day extension is made necessary
ca **2
ig by the press of business generally, and specifically because plaintiffs’ counsel was I
vi-! J
c: .
$ _ E required to file a state appellate brief on June 28, 2004. Counsel for the defendant
g consented to the extension requested herein. This is plaintiff s first request for an - I
4 `
fg 5 extension of time to respond to defendants’ motion to dismiss.
g'“:,‘§ I
·===· QI? I
I
I
I