‘i TT
Case 3*03-cv-00970-PCD Document 16 Filed O1_[22/2004 Page Eigof 1 7 M WEQ I
· {
_w ry I
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT I
' t·-.t .ru. I
_1 ji " I I
" DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT _ ‘1R. ‘ -_ V tg III!-I
l I I I"?
Jr H ,
’ 427;;
MARTIN DICKINSON
v. PRISONER I
Case No. 3:03CV970 (PCD) (JGM) I
KEITH SCOTT, etal.
I
RULINQ AND QRDER I
The defendants seek extensions of time to file a response to the complaint. The I
Motions [docs. ## 10, 12] are DENIED as moot. Pursuant to the Court’s December 2,
2003 Scheduling Order, an answer to the complaint is due on or before January 31, I
2004. I
SO ORDERED in New Haven, Connecticut, this Q-2M of January, 2004.
it I
·@· Margolis
U · ~ States Magistrate Judge
I
I
I
I
I
i