Free Motion in Limine - District Court of Connecticut - Connecticut

Case 3:03-cv-00986-JCH Document 87 Filed 06/21 /2005 Page 1 of 3
; 0 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT
SUSAN E. WOOD, CIVIL ACTION NO.
3:03-CV—986 (J CH)
Plaintiff, G
v. V A
SEMPRA ENERGY TRADING
CORP., June 20, 2005
Defendant.
DEFENDANT’S MOTION IN LIMINE TO EXCLUDE EVIDENCE OF
PLAINTIFF’S ALLEGED DAMAGES POST-DECEMBER 2002
The Defendant, Sempra Energy Trading Corp. ("Sempra") hereby respectfully
moves this Couit in limine for an Order excluding all evidence, testimony, reference to,
comment upon, or argument regarding back pay following December 2002. Moreover,
Plaintiff s claim for front pay is also overly speculative and evidence concerning this claim ,
should be excluded for this additional reason.As set forth fully in the accompanying
memorandum of law, the Defendant seeks a ruling prior to trial to preclude this evidence as a
matter of law.
I P

Case 3:03-cv-00986-JCH Document 87 Filed 06/21/2005 Page 2 of 3
_ ` Respectfully Submitted,
at By:
1 Mary . Dollarhide (ct12251)
Raymond W. Bertrand (ct22968)
PAUL, HASTINGS, JANOFSKY & WALKER LLP
1055 Washington Boulevard
1 Stamford, CT 06901-2217
Telephone: (203) 961-7400
Facsimile: (203) 359-3031
Email [email protected]
_ [email protected]
Counsel for Defendant A
Sempra Energy Trading Corp.
2

Case 3:03-cv-00986-JCH Document 87 Filed 06/21/2005 Page 3 of 3
I ` CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
The undersigned, a member of the bar of this Court, hereby certifies that on this 20th day
of June, 2005, a true and correct copy of the foregoing Motion in Limine to Exclude Evidence of
Plaintiff’ s Alleged Damages Post-December 2002 was served on the following counsel of record
via hand delivery to:
I I t Brendan J. O’Rourke, Esq.
Jeffrey M. McCormick, Esq.
Ann H. Brickley, Esq.
— O’Rourke & Associates, LLP r
27 Pine Street ·
New Canaan, CT 06840
q Rayn W. Bertrand
STM/298332.1 ”
` 3