Free Motion for Reconsideration - District Court of Connecticut - Connecticut

Case 3:03-cv-00986-JCH Document 69 Filed O3/O4/2005 Page 1 of 3
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT
SUSAN E. WOOD, CIVIL ACTION NO.
3:03-CV-986 (JCH)
Plaintiff,
v.
SEMPRA ENERGY TRADING CORPORATION, March 3 2005
Defendant.
DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION OF PARTIAL DENIAL OF ITS SUMMARY
JUDGMENT MOTION
Pursuant to Rule 7(c) of the Local Rules of Civil Procedure, Defendant Sempra Energy Trading
Corp. ("Sempra") respectfully moves the Court to reconsider its February 22, 2005 decision, denying in part
Sempra’s Motion for Partial Summary Judgment. Specifically, Sempra requests that the Court reconsider its
denial of Sempra’s motion with respect to Plaintiff s claims that Sempra terminated her employment: (1) because
of her sexual orientation; and (2) in retaliation for complaining about the Howley Incident. Sempra is not
requesting reconsideration of the Court’s denial of Sempra’s motion with respect to Plaintiff s claim that she was
terminated because of her gender.
In support of its motion, Sempra submits the accompanying memorandum of law.
ORAL ARGUMENT NOT REQUESTED

Case 3:03-cv-00986-JCH Document 69 Filed O3/O4/2005 Page 2 of 3
Dated: Stamford, Connecticut
March 3, 2005
Respectfully Submitted,
By; PW
Mary C. Dollarhide (ctl225 1
Peter M. Schultz (ctl9425)
Paul, Hastings, Janofsky & Walker, LLP
1055 Washington Boulevard
Stamford, CT 06901
Telephone: (203) 961-7400
Facsimile: (203) 359-3031
[email protected]
ATTORNEYS FOR DEFENDANT
-2-

Case 3:03-cv-00986-JCH Document 69 Filed O3/O4/2005 Page 3 of 3
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
This is to certify that a true and correct copy of the foregoing Defendarrt’s Motion for
Reconsideration was served on the following counsel of record via UPS (next business day delivery) on this 3rd
day of March 2005:
Brendan J. O’Rourke
O’Rourke & Associates, LLC
27 Pine Street
New Canaan, CT 06840
Peter M. Schultz
srwzsrsrm
-3-