Free Order - District Court of Connecticut - Connecticut

. .,,,... ' · Case 3:03-cv-OOQWCFD Document 9 Filed 10/21/ 003 Page 1 of 1
- {M3" !
` UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT N
_ DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT _
JOSEPH INTURRI, ET AL. : CIVIL ACTION NO. 3 :03 CV987 (CFD) l
Plaintiffs Q
_ CITY OF HARTFORD, CONNECTICUT; :_J__2 _ ,
and nance P. Mnnouis, §¤j;;· in if ¢ i ,
Defendants z SEPTEMBER 24, QQQQ i S.§.§.;f
r .l.. 1 1
REPORT OF PARTIES’ PLANNING MEETINQ T. *-wi l
fl; to I
Pursuant to Rules 16(b) and 26(f) ofthe Federal Rules ot`Civil Proceduremand Local Civil
,.,_(,Rule 38, a telephone conference was held on September 10, 2003. The participants were;
cn
Q _ Jon L. Schoenhorn for the plaintiffs.
Q °.‘ §` Helen Apostolidis lor the defendants. _
o ‘ 1
I I. (JERTIFICATION
: l l
fg l fl E Q Undersigned counsel certify that, after consultation with their clients, they have discussed l
cl I » “
j I E B the nature and basis of the parties’ claims and defenses and any possibilities for achieving a
•i A '“g,.
yl H I i i— Q g prompt settlement or other resolution of the case and, in consultation with their clients, have
i` ` ’ E
Q ~ ' O ml deyeloped the following proposed case management plan. Counsel further certify that they will
3 a copy of this report to their respective clients. l
<-J _.
@*1 Q_ l
J., II. é;-EQLURISDICTION `

ij? Subject Matter Jurisdiction \
lei ‘‘‘’‘ {Subject matter jurisdiction is founded upon Title 28 U.S.C. §§ 1331 and l343(a)(3) and
(4) and the first and fourteenth amendments to the United States Constitution.
I
-1-
Q