Case 3:03-cv-01009,-SRU Document 32 Filed O3/O3{2004 Page 1 dif
._ Q) ()3culc>O mw g I
I
,‘& lj? l a,..a lk}. r
6 ZUBK: FEB — 2 {D l2= 2 2
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURP _ ___ __ _._ , .. . "_
DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT w?g___ ; ig agi-; j 3 * `:· j 1 r - A
bo JOSEPH ATTIAS & HAIM ATTrAS ; i
{R z crvrro ACTION No. R
N :
\= kt vs. ; s;0s cv. \l009 (SRU)
S ¥ N
¤> ¥ .__ ,
‘ PA'1TRON@*Lf[[JTUAL INSURANCE ; JANUARY 30, 2004 all
Q COMh°AN’B‘9F CONNECTICUT ;
Q Oh fil,)
LL.! ia gi;
· _J V""* $.:2 rin
___ QL MOTION FOR COMPLIANCE
Li, § QQ
{ g P1grnPs@nt to Rule 37(a) ofthe Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the defendant in the
. "" ¤
§ ab0ve—referenced matter seeks to compel compliance with defenda11t’s discovery requests. The i
` defendant asserts that on or about October 24, 2004, Interrogatories and Requests for U
Production were served upon the plaintiffs, Joseph and Haim Attias, in this matter. Despite
§ requests for compliance, to date the plaintiffs have neither objected nor provided the defendant
__*; with responses. I
4; WI-[EREFORE, the defendant respectfully seeks an order compelling the plaintiffs to
g comply with defendant’s discovery requests. R
¤ .
A i i
SR/216143/hab i
Law Ofllcoa ol SKELLEY ROTTNER P.C. [1 P.O. Box 340890, Hartford, CT 061340890 [1 Phone: (860) 561-7077 Fax: (860) 561-7088
Jurls N0. 58693
,... - - it - it i it it is ififififiiiiiiiirc if rffciirffrii
A - - it U it it 2 it fififififififiiiii if iiirffciirf P