Free Order on Motion for Extension of Time - District Court of Connecticut - Connecticut

. I *1 —&
I _ ase 3:03-cv-O1OO9C§§iU Document 26 Filed O1/20/2004 P5)gI€`I DT IM dm
I . I > O I
“ r I
. I an ZIIUII JAN Ib ID IZI42 I
U" I] " "'; *`!"" `¤?J*"-"` I
I UNITED STATES DISTRICT COUR"%RI II? “,;",2‘ " I
DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT “` " " ‘·’ 5
JOSEPH ATTIAS & HAIM ATTIAS ; CIVIL NO. 3:03 Cv 01009 (SEIIIVO I
J; Plaintiffs zi
L5 = I
g I
Ic PATRONS MUTUAL INSURANCE ;
ij COMPANY OF CONNECTICUT ; I
Defendant : January 15, 2004 I
Au
fg I
!"—Ii`»
{Q MOTION FOR ENLARGEMENT OF TIME FOR SCHEDULING ORDERS AND I
TO CONTINUE J URY SELECTION I
¤·· ._ .
P=··—».. "` If. . . . . .
tem; Q_ I‘·· " The Plaintiffs Joseph & Hmm Attias, hereby request through their counsel for an ;
I Q I; Z -—
t'L.ej..a£1 . I
.. E I’·.E§>,bIlargement of time in regards to the scheduling orders entered into by the parties on or I
-—-
Uh "£> gé[§out August 7, 2003 and the commencement of Jury Selection in the above matter for
I I Q,) In I
`“ "" ¥Yt’he following reasons: '
§.` I
E 1. The scheduling orders were entered into between the parties and counsel I
B- I
§ Q __; on or about August 7', 2003 when the defendant was represented by I
cd
“ E vi Attorney Stuart G. Blackburn by way ofthe Planning Meeting Report
M " D ;
En dated August 7, 2003. Under said agreement/orders discovery was to be I
I- I
Q I
-§ E commenced by August l, 2003 and completed by 2/28/04, dispositive I
5 , ‘
+§ @ E motions to be filed by 3/30/04, the Joint Trial Memorandum to be filed
. “*’ .2 E
E E g Q by 3/30/04 and the case be ready for trial by April 2004.
E 3 is E I
L? Q E Q I?. I
sssoa I
`6 E E gp I I
E cn cz as I
-A-= --.>
L . . . - . .. .. t. . t. ii`i`i`i i`
---¢ I-.: