Free Motion for Summary Judgment - District Court of Connecticut - Connecticut


File Size: 52.3 kB
Pages: 2
Date: February 15, 2005
File Format: PDF
State: Connecticut
Category: District Court of Connecticut
Author: unknown
Word Count: 449 Words, 2,562 Characters
Page Size: 612.72 x 1008 pts
URL

https://www.findforms.com/pdf_files/ctd/22939/75-1.pdf

Download Motion for Summary Judgment - District Court of Connecticut ( 52.3 kB)


Preview Motion for Summary Judgment - District Court of Connecticut
I I ase 3:03-cv-01009-SRU Document 75 Filed O2/15/2005 Page 1 0 I
I I
I UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
I DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT I
I JOSEPH ATTIAS & HAIM ATTIAS ; CIVIL NO. 3:03 CV 01009 (SRU)
I Plaintiffs : .. ‘E.`%.·>° I
. »_ ,-¥Z·" L;-in 5 I I
· [:15 =jT »¢¤¤¤*
PATRONS MUTUAL INSURANCE : jj;Q_;Q G, ‘; A
?_€`Ehi::5 tl I
. T"` "I ¤.='
I COMPANY OF CONNECTICUT . ::5 E {:3 I
I Defendant : FEBRUARY 14, 2005 I
~ .-·~§
PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT I
`
Pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Rule 56, the plaintiffs, Joseph and Haim Attias I
hereby move for summary judgment as there are no genuine issues as to material fact regarding the I
clefendant’s Counterclaim alleging unjust enrichment and the plaintiffs are entitled to judgment as a matter
of law. As more particularly set forth in the attached memorandum of law, the defendant is seeking money t
damages in the amount of $134,000 (plus interest and cost of investigating plaintiffs’ claim), for money I
paid to the plaintiffs insurance company pursuant to the contract for insurance between the defendant and I
the plaintiffs. It is the plai11tiffs’ contention that this claim has no basis in law as any recovery of said funds I
would be controlled by the contract between the parties, the insurance policy.
WHEREFORE, the plaintiffs now move for summary judgment on the defendanfs counter claim I
I
on the basis that no genuine issue of material fact or law exist and the plaintiffs are entitled to judgment as I
a matter of law. In support of this motion the plaintiffs rely on the attachment memorandum of law and I
Local Rule 56(a) 1 Statement. I
THE PLAINTIF F, ;
BY L--·e as I
Cheryl E. Heffe
Farver & Heff nan l
2842 Old Dixwell Avenue
Hamden, Connecticut 06518
Telephone: 203-230-2500
Facsimile: 203-288-4702
Fed Bar No.:CT 06473
1* * ;· as s ;- e ;- A ;A AA A- A A- A A- A A- A -- A - A. .. - .. .iii §`TT”TT" ~
t ' " " '= ‘ 2

e·e·A ¥Z#TZ‘TZ‘Ti‘ if Qi QM A T"
—— T- AJAA E

I I
I ase 3:03-cv-O100?§RU Document 75 Filed O2/15/$005 Page 2 of 2 »
I 222 I
I I
I CERTIFICATION
` I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent by first class mail, postage prepaid this I4"` N
I
day of February, 2005 to:
Joel J. Rottner, Esq.
Skelley Rotmer P.C. I
I PO Box 340890 I
Halma, or 00134-0000 ,
I
Cheryl E. Heffernan ? § `
I
I
I
I
I I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I