Free Motion for Extension of Time - District Court of Connecticut - Connecticut

I II—I—I`_I
I Case 3:03-cv-O10&%JBA Document 53 Filed 11/(3 4 Pa of3 I
I I
II NDVI- ID I; 38I I
UNITED STATES DISTRICT CCU T I I I
I DISTRICT OF CONNECTICLHT . DIS RI ‘ COURT I
I NEW IIAI II. CT
CECIL YOUNI¤ ;
= I I I
I Plaintiff, : CIV. N0. $ 03CvI0 (JBA)
I I I
I . I I I I
vs. · I I I II II I I
CITY OF BRI GEPORT I-ICUSING ; I I I
AUTHORITY, IET AL : I I
I Z I I
I Defendants : NOVEMB 8, 2IIO I
I I I
IvIOTI N FOR EXTENSI N OF TIME FOR SCH =; ¤ LIN Ie. ·· DER
The D fendants respectfully request that the C0 per it extensi n `f I
time for the S heduling Order and extend the date to Dec ber :-1Io, .= IIO4 for fili Ig if I
dispositive mo ions and, thereafter, trial memorandum and rial ad s i• the exi Iti I
I I
Scheduling Or er. I I
CounseI for the Plaintiff and Counsel for the DefenII II have e n I
discussing setIlement. Defendants counsel has been aw iting aIr ~ onse fro Ith , I
Plaintiff to Magistrate Margolis. I have not heard from PI intiff’sIc sel regarI:IinI
I I
the status of our proposals. I I I .
I I
In accordance with Local Rule 9, Counsel for th =· DefenI1 has trIeI:1 t -
contact Plaintiffs counsel to determine his position but has had rIcI r ·=. onse to cIat .
I I I
I I
I I I
I :
I I
BMFO4160 1 I I

I II I I I I I I
' Case 3:03-cv-0106-5JBA Document 53 Filed 11/@ 4 Pa? 2 0f3 I g I
I I
I I I I
I
I I I
This is the Defendants’ first request for an Ext nsion Io ime to sIIb it
dispositive motions in accordance with the Scheduling Or r.
I I I
THE DEFEN ANTQ I I
By: f II I
Barbara Braz el-Ma = ·_·
Associate cII Attor I
OFFICE OF I-IE Cl II: TORNEY
999 Broad St et - 2 d or I
BrIdgeport,C 066§4 II I
Telephone # 3/57 — = ··_ I
Fed. Bar No. 5746
I I I I
I I I I
I I I
I
I I I
I I I I
I I I
. I II _ I II I’ I
I I I
I I
I I I I
I
I I
I I
I I I
I I I I I
I I
I I I I
I I
I I
BMF04160 2 I
II ` I II — I _?

e EI i ` E D
' Case 3:03-cv-O1O{-QSJBA Document 53 Filed 11/C&9§ 4 Pa? 3 of 3 i =
-__,x“ - ` 1 E E E
3 l l i
3 l
i » i i
l
QERTIFICATION
i l i
This is to certify that a copy of the foregoing "l\/lotio for Eylt ion of Tirrle r l
Scheduling Order" has been mailed, postage prepaid, on this 8** of Noverhb r, l
2004, ta; ,
Thomas J. Weihing, Esq. T . lg ,, ,
Daly, Weihing & Bochanis l i a {
1115 Main Street, Suite 710 l *
Bridgeport, CT 06604
Michael T. Ryan, Esq.IJames Mahar, Esq.
Ryan, Ryan, Johnson & Deluca, LLP T
80 Fourth Street l
Stamford, CT 06905 l a
Magistrate Judge Joan G. Margolis l
United States District Court i l
141 Church Street i _
New Haven, Ct 06510 ‘
p ,
ll i' · llixkina
Barbara Brazzel- I assar l
Ni i
.i B ` Ei ll n `
l l l
, ` I ` I I
, l 1 '
i l l
i l r
i 3 1
~ i . i
BlVIF04‘l50 3 I
i i I 5 M ' _;