Free Order on Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply to Motion - District Court of Connecticut - Connecticut

Case 3:03-cv-O10&il%JBA Document 67 Filed O4/1(91$OO4 Page 1 of 1
·¤ ·’ I II “~ _
cu
it ‘ . 1
A $11
,1 ~ AW 1
8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT gg; ·’
g DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT It 11·C` 1 F I · *_ g
u . -· $-0 - _ 1
8 EJONATHAN FRANK, and FRANK ,;, ..1~»1 1
J AMILY 1996 TRUST (on behalf of {f3‘5?»_ ,0 ‘· _ a, .1-1 1
-51 Imselves and REFLEXITE /
Ig . ORPORATION) {jg 1
-3 g CIVIL ACTION NO.: 3:03cvl0l4 (JBA?) I
b 3 Plaintiffs
§ B
3 2 v. J -
=Ei E 1
7,, . TI-IUR LOVETERE, CECIL
TQ SPRUNG, LOUIS J. BACCEI, WORTH
1; 1 OMIS, THEODORE PATLOVICI-I,
E1 _ TEPHEN J. RAFFAY, WILLIAM P. E
°· ROWLALND, PETER EIO (individually and I
__1T in their eapadi-ty as members of the Board of I
tg Di1gptof§I5>fl§eflexite Corporation) and
g1 REELE}HTE__-CORPORATION `
. ..,,_•_§ FTF.,] 1,1 1
F ··1—»·» “"`"" 5 K A i
I'° -5 5..a,_ W) 5-as QZ.? Defendants APRIL 2, 2004 1
1-I ·-I1 ‘I;·· I
H W ,m._.: 1;*} il ;
U E REFLEXITE’S MOTION ON CONSENT FOR EXTENSION OF TIME

+1
g Pursuant to Rule 7(b) ofthe Local Rules of Civil Procedure of the United States 1
as
Ig Q District Court for the District of Connecticut, the defendant, Reflexite Corporation
rn to 1
ft!
E1 ,12; ("Retlexite"), respectfully requests that the Court extend the current briefing schedule for -
4-1 .
0 .1.1
E _g1; tire defendants’ motions to dismiss based upon statutory grounds for a period of thirty 1
in ss -1-1 1
nr rd u
Q ·§ @0) days. In support of this motion Reflexite represents as follows: .
1-1 U3 o 1
u
E __T E 1. The Court previously set April 30, 2004 as the deadline for the defendants
Q Q4 . u I
0 GJ n >
QQ E 3 $0 file motions to dismiss based upon statutory grounds.
Ig Eg §)RAL ARGUMENT NOT REQUESTED! ,
;,; rg 9, QESTIMONY NOT REQUIRED 1
¤
II:). E E II·§1ART1-1111067-1 I
2.1 3 E a
1