Free Memorandum in Opposition to Motion - District Court of Connecticut - Connecticut

Case 3:03-cv-01015-DJS

Document 23-2

Filed 09/21/2004

Page 1 of 3

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF CONNCTICUT

GLENS FALLS INSURCE COMPANY:
alslo HAROLD and LAURN HEINZ Plaintiff
v.

CIVIL ACTION NO. 303 CV 1015 (DJS)

COMMAND FORCE SECURTY
SYSTEMS, INC.

SEPTEMBER 21, 2004

Defendant

NOTICE OF MANUAL FILING

Please take notice that Plaintiff, Glens Falls Insurance Company, Inc., has
manually fied the Exhibits 1 - 1 0 of the Plaintiff s Memorandum of Law in Opposition to

Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment.

These documents have not been fied electronically because either these
documents cannot be converted to an electronic format andlor for the documents that can
be converted, the electronic fie size of the documents exceed 1.5 megabytes.
The documents have been manually served on all parties.

Respectfully Submitted,

THE PLAITIFF,

GLENS FALLS INSURCE COMPANY alslo HAROLD and LAURN HEINZ

By Isl Joseph E. Mascaro
Joseph E. Mascaro, Esq. - CT 12736 Morrison Mahoney LLP
One Constitution Plaza, ioth Floor

Hartford, CT 06103 (860) 616-4441 (860) 541-4878
j mascaro(£morrisonmahoney. com

Case 3:03-cv-01015-DJS

Document 23-2

Filed 09/21/2004

Page 2 of 3

CERTIFICA TE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing was mailed to the following parties of record postage prepaid this 21 8t day of September, 2004, as follows:
Attorney Michael Mezzacappa Kaufman, Borgeest & Ryan, LLP 200 Summit Lake Drive Valhalla, NY 10595

Isl Joseph E. Mascaro Joseph E. Mascaro

Case 3:03-cv-01015-DJS

Document 23-2

Filed 09/21/2004

Page 3 of 3

Clerk's Offce United States District Court 450 Main Street Hartford, CT 06103