Free Order on Motion for Extension of Time - District Court of Connecticut - Connecticut

. · - - - ` 12/05/2003 P 1 f 1
1 Case 3.03 cv 01017 JCH Document 15 Fnled éagebypmj /€7Ln/1
ci 3 cu /01 7c/no
1 Day, BCITY 8c Howard LLP
counsnrrons AT raw
1 Terence J. Gallagher
_` A §Direct Dial: (203) 977-7594
1 si C E—mail: [email protected]
Qs § e H
\ \ December 3, 2003 ?i§‘%’° T C7
*1 t . I @7
1 (1 . VIA OVERNIGHT DELIVERY J) {
Q 1 The Honorable Janet C. Hall 7 @
1 United States District Court rr; EE
i District of Connecticut
1 915 Lafayette Street
Bridgeport, CT 06604
Q Re: The Media Group, Inc. et al. v. Arent Fox Kintner
` Plotkin & Kahn, PLLC et al. 3:03-CV—l0l7 §JCI·I[
Dear Judge Hall:
1 We represent defendant Arent Fox Kintner Plotkin & Kahn, PLLC in the above-
1 captioned matter. 1
_ I write to Your Honor to inform the court that following defendant Arent Fox’s motion to 1
I ' dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction, plaintiffs have filed an action seeking almost
identical relief in the New York State Supreme Court, Westchester County. Counsel for the 1
1 parties hjfve discussed the filing of the New York action, and it is contemplated that plaintiffs 1
voltugtari1y` withdraw the above-captioned action. Counsel for plaintiffs has indicated a need
1 ` · somfiitlime to consult with his clients. In the interim, the Rule 26(i) reporting deadline will
(Y] éichdjnire. `I erefore, the parties request that no order issue conceming the Rule 26(t) reporting
J %_de1adline1in the next ten days. 1
1 " .. 1, C Respectfully submitted, 1
I M-"""""‘·* ‘ ` {
S NR Terence J. allagher l
A cc: Alfred Laub, Esq. (pro hac vice motion pending
I — counsel for plaintiffs)
1 Alexander H. Schwartz, Esq. (counsel for plaintiffs)
1 Yi . A
One Canterbury Green 1 Stamford, CT 06901 1 t 203 977 7500]*203 977 7501
Q" Q Boston Greenwich Hartford New York Stamford www.dé}a.c0m
.... - - - - P - tt .... .... I QQ II]ZYQCIZC.
.t.. - - - - - - ..,. -QQQQ][],Q]gTQCJIICIXQQ