Free Motion for Extension of Time - District Court of Connecticut - Connecticut


File Size: 54.3 kB
Pages: 1
Date: December 8, 2003
File Format: PDF
State: Connecticut
Category: District Court of Connecticut
Author: unknown
Word Count: 433 Words, 2,756 Characters
Page Size: 612.72 x 1008 pts
URL

https://www.findforms.com/pdf_files/ctd/22947/14.pdf

Download Motion for Extension of Time - District Court of Connecticut ( 54.3 kB)


Preview Motion for Extension of Time - District Court of Connecticut
C 3:03- -01017-JCH D t 14 F`I d 12/04/2003 P 1 1
ase cv ocumen n e éaggypgf 7 /6_/_n/N
0 ECA! I O! Yryixg
Day, Berry 8c Howard LLP
COUNSELLORS AT LAW'
\ ference J. Gallagher
I A \ )irect Dial: (203) 977-7594
kc l—mail: [email protected]
. K `* \ ··.-ea
\ U 5 E W
P I L E T
_ \ ~— December 3, 2003 g·;:;~ I {Qi
\ .. _g:· ·-W
(I . VIA OVERNIGHT DELIVERY irifiiii
L » es E ee
° I I The Honorable Janet C. Hall §i T ®
¤ I United States District Court E
I » District of Connecticut
‘ 5 I 915 Lafayette Street
N \Bridgeport, CT 06604 I
`\ ‘·-’ l
\J Re: The Media Group, Inc. et al. v. Arent Fox Kintner I
Q Plotkin & Kahn, PLLC et al. 3:03-CV-1017 (ICH) I
__ L Dear Judge Hall: I
I ""· We represent defendant Arent Fox Kintner Plotkin & Kahn, PLLC in the above-
I < captioned matter.
.
‘ I I I write to Your Honor to infonn the court that following defendant Arent Fox’s motion to
;_ 3 dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction, plaintiffs have filed an action seeking almost
I >identical relief in the New York State Supreme Court, Westchester County. Counsel for the
__` parties @3/e discussed the filing of the New York action, and it is contemplated that plaintiffs
I volugtarily`iwithdraw the above-captioned action. Cotmsel for plaintiffs has indicated a need
{ somqtime to consult with his clients. In the interim, the Rule 26(f) reporting deadline will
- R) S éxipire, “herefore, the parties request that no order issue concerning the Rule 26(t) reporting I
( _ Q Hdegadlinefin the next ten days. I
I ` 5 I r
I .__; I L. LLL! I I Respectfully submitted,
· er M
r av---—· · -» I
[ ` L Terence J. allagher
¤ cc: Alfred Laub, Esq. (pro hac vice motion pending I
$ I I — counsel for plaintiffs) ,
r I Alexander H. Schwartz, Esq. (counsel for plaintiffs)
IY t
1
. §
I , "‘ One Canterbury Green I Stamford, CT 06901 I at 203 977 7300f 203 977 7301
YS · é Boston Greenwich Hartford New York Stamford www.db!a.cam I
_ - I n if _-{*3-;r`A__ki—_k;_; TT; T; T- T I- - I .- ..-. » .=e.... e.eee:x—~»;:.w¤=-»’¤=*·***“*=*°“"‘““`;TiT-IEEE-7;v;i:ixEwmH&m7wx€1jIrA7PN(G7-(ami{W(THTWTHCWHC
I I _ L _ ._._._ ’ ’ ` I
L. L s L. L L L L .,.. 3 ees. e ri ...... L L ,..., L
“ ·e·*e· ‘
L L 0 · e ·e·--- I J L L
-¢e-» ·· ee -- - — . .. . .5 F· ···- -;-· P
‘j‘*‘*‘*"*`”"’t‘* M ‘-‘‘ ‘‘0·e