Free Order on Motion for Extension of Time - District Court of Connecticut - Connecticut

I . p Case 3:03-cv-O104$tNC B Document 23 Filed 05/ZTOO5 Page 1 of 1 I
U, I Z. °'L q UNITED STATES DISTRICT COUR’&m _
E, oisrmcr or CONNECTICUT
I>» . “y . fl
Q fm
Q) < l l
·¤ r- · DEN ISE CORREA : CIVIL ACTIO z p Q
U; .5; ‘ , NO.3:03CV104]ml\l¢ll`C)2 A 0 55
2 5.; ‘€»"· ‘ at awt; ,
N Ei ». ¥·l?,?lx$?.ll: Cl.
. O ¤$ IOHN E. POTTER ‘ ; MAY 23, 2005, _
R 6 POSTMASTER, U.S. l `
O . .
.:1. m . 1 z POSTAL SERVICE
gf j ,8 PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR EXTENSION
U-I S {
3, gl i ~ Plaintiff hereby moves this Court for an extension of thirty (30) days within _
¤ '
jj E which to depose the Defendant’s Keeper of Records, and a Ms. Vera Wright
E fg employed by the Defendant, and possibly those witnesses interviewed by Ms.
4.>
fg Wright with respect to Plaintiff’s EEO Complaint filed in this matter. In support p
g 2* of this motion Plaintiff’s Counsel re resents: ` ·
M ·¤ P
O cv
"O »-U _ '
cl ···* '“'“ Ji · .,
2)) E " {sj gm; ‘p' ,Defendant has denied that Plaintiff ever exhausted the
8 lg <; o administrative EEO/ EEOC requirements prior to filing suit
S); B in this matter. ll Ku ,
§ 5 its * ‘ y x
·. . ·•·| um . __·-
5 *-’ · “ I I Plaintiff maintains that s`H'e timel filed an EEO EEOC
sq g \ y
Q' ,0 Complaint in this matter and that the matter was
4; _ 030/ \o Fg Q · investigated by the Defendant’s Vera Wright, who . I .
.'-| K
E *,3:* interviewed the Plaintiff and other witnesses.
·¤-I
Ee g I l `
§ 8 3. Upon information and belief, Ms. Wright functioned as the
Q .
rg V C Defendant’s EEO/ EEOC Investigating Officerand i · 1 `
2 lg _ I conducted the requisite investigation of the P1aintiff’s
8 ¤· ` ··l‘ ’ `‘‘`' . . "T JA . . .
_ JJ charges, interviewed W1lCI‘1€SSg‘[S,__lI1CluCl1Hg Pla1nt1ff’s
R E erstwhile supervisor, Ron DeMaida. I- if L "" .,
>• w . \
-v-I
il 3 W A