Free Order on Motion for Extension of Time - District Court of Connecticut - Connecticut

A r—— .._...,.,... ,.._._,. _,_,_
1 #{,2, Case 3:03-cv-(*349-RNC Document 13 Filedif/1272004 Page 1 of 1
I l 2
\ \ UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT ‘ ` ' l
‘ DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT .
I SI-il-if-¤¢·>I·¤HI-#-5I-if-SI-tl-if-il-8*>I·>HI-¤F>Hl·>I·8E·¤I~¤HHI·>I·$I·JI·¤|·¤l·l!·¤I·>!·¤F$F5I·¤|·¤I· A _ ` ` · I j 1 n !
DENISE CORREA, * - { F
I Plaintiff * CIVIL NO. gs`.? 3 C L'/(B / G AN? _
v ’* .1.a . ‘
it-
(ab
1 POSTMASTER, U.S. POSTAL *
i SERVICE and MPO RON DEMAIDA * JURY TRIAL REQUESTED
individually and in his *
official Capacity, * J
Defendants ’* MAY 7, 2004 \
¤(·>|-¤I-¤I·¤F>HI·=I·>|·>Hl·>I·>I-¤I-¤F¤¢->F¤I·¤}·¤I·¤G·¤I-¤|-¤I·¤I·8-$I·¤I·!·$·¤I->}-¤f·¤I-¤I·¤I·>I-¤I-¤i··¤I·9I·¤C-
MOTION TO AMEND ORIGINAL PRE-TRIAL h
DEADLINES AND FOR SCHEDULING ORDER(S) -
Plaintiff, through counsel undersigned, hereby moves this Court to amend I
the original Pretrial Deadlines of June I3, 2003 and for the necessary scheduling 1
orders. (Exhibit A) In support of this Motion, Plaintiff re resents as follows: f
P 1
1. This matter came to this Court on or about Iune 12, 2003. \
‘ I
2. Service was not made on the defendant until March 2004, because [
the complaint had inadvertently been placed in a closed file.
3. This Court subsequently ordered service on the defendant and _
return of proof of service to this court by March 12, 2004. é
May 12, 2004.
Case Number 3 : 03CV1049 (RNC)
tr »—··—
RE: Mot ion- toghgjgend Original Pre —'I‘rial Deadlines and for Scheduling Order (s)
@0c ;...>
|,..... rr: . , . . ·
‘ ;E ’ f t nsion of time it is hereby denied without
;;;§ get§}oi Jtcon ccgnilirx with Local Rule 7 (b} (3) . In addition , the
Rule·2·~5 (f )ge;iEért must be filed joint ly. So ordered .
LL e at .
T - Z:} Ro ert N. Chatigny, U. . .J.