Free Order on Motion for Extension of Time - District Court of Connecticut - Connecticut

l JOm_——__%; __ ,
l Cai3:O3—cv-00623-CCR5) Document 22 Filed O2/18/2(giliii ?;Rage€;2i.Qof»1m5,t—l~l— ,".·,\,_Q~
I UNITED STATES DISTRICT COU? m ‘
I A DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT
( FD 2= Ob
( KAREN HARTER, : muh FEB 3
Piaamirr » . UURT
z . ’ll"l’Cl C
: Civ. Aéil§R ll§§t$:b&QYGZw3(CFD)
l v. : FEBRUARY 12, 2004 (`//W`/
l ` US IN_VES_TIGATIONS
SERjV‘ICES, INC., : e
E —P Defendant
l I(;LAINT?I`FFS’ MOTION TO EXTEND DISCOVERY AND DEADLINE FOR A
l Mg _-1,-*,;-;_ .. _v_ j A FILING DISPOSITIVE MOTIONS l
rg I =.,.
8 ·‘*» _ _ _ l
'E ‘ Q5 P1a1nt1ffKaren Harter hereby respectfully requests an extension of time to l
Q .
_ D
gf §Qomplete discovery and file dispositive motions in this case, pursuant to Local Civil Rule E
• I S: X
: O 9(b). Plaintiff requests an additional ninety (90) days from the date the ori inal deadline
_ 8
Q · FJ {
EN 7 Fig Eq; for completion of discovery, as per the Scheduling Order [Endorsement Order dated July l
v:¤.·d” F
El Ec; § 1, 2003] The original deadline for completion of discovery is February 28, 2004. The
. a
U O m new deadline would be May 28, 2004.
Plaintiff also seeks permission to extend the deadline for filing dispositive
A motions for ninety (90) days beyond April 30, 2004. The original deadline for tiling
dispositive motions is April 30, 2004. The new deadline would be July 29, 2004.
ORAL ARGUMENT NOT REQUESTED
TESTIMONY NOT REQUIRED
l

l