Free Order on Motion to Strike - District Court of Connecticut - Connecticut

Case 3:03-cv-OO€%3-CFD D0cument15 Filed OE,[$7/2004 Page 1 0f1
<\£9 F h-.£ E?} a.-·a I
UNITED STATES DISTRICT cc$i1i1iTJUN 23 D V Bb
DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT _ . H
LES IQ3iE3l"R_jC`f' COURT
KAREN HARTER, ) HARTFORD CT
) T
Plaintiff, ) CIVIL ACTION NO. , i
) 3:O3CV623 (CFD) C
`
v- J
)
US INVESTIGATIONS ) JUNE 23, 2003
SERVICES, INC., )
) l
_g _ 3 Defendant. )
43 I _! 2 W
;g1 lg i MOTION TO STRIKE THE COMPLAINT OR
2 5 PORTIONS THEREOF WITHOUT PREJUDICE
CI
Eq E 2
mu E Pursuant to Rules 8(a) , 8(e) and 12(f) of the Federal
I D ‘
ng pqgules of Civil Procedure, the Defendant US Investigations
r-._ I . $3 , .
gg ‘” ervices, Inc. hereby requests that the Court strike the {
cn I E
CD Lggqiomplaint or portions thereof without prejudice. Defendant’s E
’·• U ?
I izounsel has indicated to Plaintiffs counsel that he would ;
accept service by mail of a redrafted Complaint in lieu of i
service upon Defendant. In support of this Motion, Defendant i
states the following: _ ·
E ___ P, 1. Rule 8(a) states that the Complaint shall
.:.-1- Qi _
Q cqnta:|`£';;a short and plain statement of the claim .... ”. Rule
l
mg 8(g‘) @@es that "each averment of a pleading shall be simple, N
r·· Egczw N
.-B coigbislghud direot." Rule 12(f) provides that upon Motion, the I
s wx l
E :::3 T

H
I
N
mm ..... l