Free Order on Motion for Extension of Time - District Court of Connecticut - Connecticut


File Size: 42.9 kB
Pages: 1
Date: December 10, 2003
File Format: PDF
State: Connecticut
Category: District Court of Connecticut
Author: unknown
Word Count: 349 Words, 2,717 Characters
Page Size: 612.72 x 1008 pts
URL

https://www.findforms.com/pdf_files/ctd/23015/12.pdf

Download Order on Motion for Extension of Time - District Court of Connecticut ( 42.9 kB)


Preview Order on Motion for Extension of Time - District Court of Connecticut
A -~- -#-- -- ~#·· ~··——————-———————-~—-——-————-——-—~————-——---»»-*—-»--..;-—r.-.-....-.._..|;..|II .IJ.......l-.-{.-. ___,_________
. _ Case 3:03-cv-OO64ۤFD Document 12 Filed 12/O3/200 Pa e 1_of 1 ,
030. I/@0*IrIrIW€Jc~I°
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COUI®{T { _ A
DISTRICT or coNNEcr1cUT I { D*L‘
····································—-----—--------- — -—---——-- X . . ,
BRUCE CHARLES RYAN, RUSSELL WILLIAM I KIIIU {IUI 2b Ii;) I: 3 II
NEWTON, ROBERT FITZPATRICK, and MERIT : _ I
CAPITAL ASSOCIATES, INC., : 3:03 CV 00544 CULI}iQ`|" i
; it Rl FOR!D‘" {
Plaintiffs, : { I
; I
NATIONAL FIRE INSURANCE
OEIRITTSBURGH, PA., and : {
FI`ECIiINICI§L€—SERVICES, INC., : November 25, 003
il Ii ‘· -· I CTI .
. t.. ~, · I
i “`f . Q T I rf = {
IQ ·~ A · I- __-I I __? {..,3; Defendants. : ·
iii UE --—-~— 4-¢ ---- :—¥#¥% -—————-----——-—-————---------————---— X {
_ §£:‘ ` `J ‘ MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME
YK.: 5: {
= Defendants National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh, A.("National {
IY? · ifi I- I
%ion") and AIG Technical Services, Inc.("AIGTS") hereby respectfully m ve pursuant to Fed.
as rm I
{4;- Q I
' Civ. P. 6(b)(l) and D. Conn. L. Civ. R. 7(b)(3) for an extension of time t and including I
“
gi". ecember 15, 2003 for plaintiffs to tile its amended complaint and Ian exten ion of time to and {
I
. including December 30, 2003 for the defendants to answer, move against, o otherwise respond {
to the amended complaint which will be tiled by plaintiffs in this action. In support of this {
I
I
motion, undersigned counsel states as follows: I
l. This is the first request for an extension of time made by def ndants National {
Union and AIGTS with respect to this time limitation. { {
2. By order of the Court dated October 14, 2003, this case has been consolidated {
{ I
with Gwynn, et al v. National Union, et al, Docket Number 3:03 CV 01 1.54 (CFD)("Gwymi").
3. A simultaneous motion for extension of time is being filed i Gwynn.
{00052001; l; 0040-3}
{ I

I"""“ or mem