Free Order on Motion for Miscellaneous Relief - District Court of Connecticut - Connecticut


File Size: 28.6 kB
Pages: 2
Date: September 28, 2004
File Format: PDF
State: Connecticut
Category: District Court of Connecticut
Author: unknown
Word Count: 287 Words, 1,775 Characters
Page Size: Letter (8 1/2" x 11")
URL

https://www.findforms.com/pdf_files/ctd/23022/19.pdf

Download Order on Motion for Miscellaneous Relief - District Court of Connecticut ( 28.6 kB)


Preview Order on Motion for Miscellaneous Relief - District Court of Connecticut
Case 3:03-cv-00651-MRK

Document 19

Filed 09/28/2004

Page 1 of 2

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT

WILLIAM E. McCARTY, Plaintiff, v. DERIVIUM CAPITAL, LLC, et al, Defendants.

: : : : : : : : :

Civil No. 3:03cv651 (MRK)

AMENDED ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE The Court hereby orders the following: (1) Defendants shall have until October 29, 2004 to show cause why default should not be entered against them for failure to appear and respond in the above-captioned matter. Defendants are on notice that failure to respond to this order may result in entry of default and eventual default judgment against them. Defendants should also bear in mind that if they have not been properly served in the above-captioned matter, then the Court will, upon a showing of cause good cause by the Plaintiff pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(m), grant Plaintiff an extension of time in order file the appropriate documents with the United States Marshals Service and effectuate service. (2) Plaintiff's Motion for Default Judgment [doc. #14] and Motion for Summary Judgment [doc. #14] are DENIED without prejudice to Mr. McCarty's renewal after October 29, 2004 if Defendants have not responded to this Court's Order. If Plaintiff renews his motions, he may do so by filing a motion to renew, and he need not resubmit the supporting documents, though he may submit supplemental documents if he wishes to do so. (3) Plaintiff's Motion to Renew [doc. # 18] is DENIED as premature because it was filed

Case 3:03-cv-00651-MRK

Document 19

Filed 09/28/2004

Page 2 of 2

prior to the date by which the Court previously directed the Defendants to respond.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

/s/

Mark R. Kravitz United States District Judge

Dated at New Haven, Connecticut: September 27, 2004.