Free Order on Motion to Transfer to Another District - District Court of Connecticut - Connecticut

E '§ Case 3:03-cv-00651-MRK Document 10 Filed 1 1/24/2003 Page 1 of 1
it •-1
Ill Q · l _ I
.4}:} § . r . i I
rf 1
EE ... E1 i·"_
S “’ N
¤ g 113 Grove Place __ g _ . -’·1 g
3 ,1, West Haven, CT 06516 - - _ I Y 1
tig § September 25, 2003
ll
§‘ it Christopher F. Droney I
Z: *" United States District Judge I
L United States District Court {
f" *1* District of CT 1
fg E Hartford, CT I
e
r-I
og Re: Civil Action #3:03 CV651 (CFD) Q
ig E District Court, Hartford, CT " i
Q; ¤ Your Honor:
fil E I
`: § Now that request for counsel (DOC. #4) has been denied, as a layman being
3, _g disabled, not being able to drive, being under strong medication, being 71 years of age,
_ § ’¤ with my only way of getting to Hartford is by car, and my wife being 69 years of age and g
u .3 my only means of transporting me, our combined income being $1,850.00 per month, I Q
_g { have to request that this hearing be held in New Haven and be held now with a jury being
E 3 present. This way I can present my case myself in laymen’s terms to other laymen who
-·1 3 will be making the decision on the evidence presented and explained by me.
F 4::
gt H Also, any evidence the defendants present I will have the right to have explained
g so I understand and the jury understands at the time it is presented.
U
:1 1
is 5 You as a Federal Judge must understand why this is very important because of the I
g ‘” liberties hedge iimd companies have taken that are not allowed under the Security |
H E Exchange Laws and Rules. To quote Attorney General Eliot Spitzer of New York,
A'; id "I—Iedge fund companies seem to make there own laws and rules as to what they can and 1
¤¤ =’ can’t do."
»-i 3 I
fh
gn': `ii rtw You; Honor, you state (see Cooper V.A. Sargenti Co., Inc., 877 F. 2D 170 (2"°
,_, *,;,3 cir. Tig`89) I-Las a layman and being disable_t1`/arggltattliis time not having the means to pay
jj 3 = rneyihdjxplain, will just take your wgr being a person with an income of
r§ E ~ ‘ 1, as .00 and disabled does not qualify for a pro·bono attorney.
’ bi Fog QJ 1
S ig fj.fji§; I at this time and from the time I started this process in February, 2000,
E é " •.j§Qving;allfH1e rules ofthe contract as laid down by Derivium Capital aka First Security
g 0 Q ;· che Seeimhy Exchange Commission that took me to arbitration filing through I
.5, -5 4 { I- `,· ‘ · J `can Arbitration Association only to be told that the Wachovia Bank, not being a ;
E __e_ · in ustgmer of theirs, they would not proceed with the case and that I did not have the I
~· .., is . ti: 1
I ,.14 ut tu I .¤ as I
§E§*- *25 I
tact *ss§
r-· is rn 0 13 .-1 I
¤‘A‘!k*?.!L‘f~’=%11§;¢:.,·..· ·. ;;i. ,_.-, ge _H ;M gg - ;gg4e1p·, ;gg·;m.y$p»-»~»¤-masa-~»<~. -·-· -r--G-..~..»..·a·,.ws¤...,,...·...,r.n.....r r... ........»,... Wn ,.,..,gm,.,:. . ....,....,,M,,._,,“__, wR§¢w;k““mvgW_ {
, 1
i-in ll if--— "‘;’*;—--;ér.i’;_r_;-;_._;f.;.___ ,;_ L_ "_ _' A- . 2 _ _ __ i _ I HM
·jjj_ _ A_ _ u 7 , . ,__,__ _ _
é('L ;;_’3:;;r7;;-%;:;?i,_ _,_ ____,_;__;,_L;, i 1 _ i __ r A- JA- -— rr- __" rw _" rw - rr -;`; ; 1; 7

-
Mun __ % ‘"‘:*;·—¢---4—.i.·.;;r_;·;_:.;r,.- .;_ ;_ ___ f_ 7 . _ _ __ _ f I I M-
jj; _ _ _ f r _ _ __ ____ __ ' _
§ %?—:;;T;5j%;;_.¥__r __ ___Af;,_if L _ 2 7 _ 7 F I J-- 74- -_- rn- _" rn -n r --( V --7; J __