Free USCA Mandate - District Court of Connecticut - Connecticut


File Size: 61.3 kB
Pages: 2
Date: August 11, 2005
File Format: PDF
State: Connecticut
Category: District Court of Connecticut
Author: unknown
Word Count: 393 Words, 2,419 Characters
Page Size: 612.72 x 1008 pts
URL

https://www.findforms.com/pdf_files/ctd/23023/65.pdf

Download USCA Mandate - District Court of Connecticut ( 61.3 kB)


Preview USCA Mandate - District Court of Connecticut
Case 3:03-cv-00652-PCD I Document 65 Filed 08/10/2005 Page 1 of 2 ` I
·· . it UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
_ _ ron run srzcorm cmcrnr
_ ·· ·· rnuncoon MARSHALL us. cormr nousr:
_ 40 FOLEYS UARE are 5 ~¤ r" *`
New YORFCQIDUDT Um ii E Q
R0sea¤zrLl;:lVI Date: 8/2/05 . · Q} . . D o ‘ -
Docket Number: 05-2281-cv =’ A 2 ig `
Short Title: Myers v. Hartford *%,-,0 ,,_<$·°
· DC Docket Number: 03-cv·652 8;* B· M¤°“°°\`°O\36
DC; DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT (NEW HAVEN) COND Gm Q
DC Judge: Honorable Peter Dorsey j
I
i
I A i
At a stated term of the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, held at the Thurgood
Marshall United States Courthouse, Foley Square, in the City of New York, on the lst. day of August, two
thousand five. Q
Beverly Myers, Q
. - Plaintiff-Appellant, l
v. _
City of Hartford, .
_ Defendant,
i
Edna Negron, D. Anwar AI-Ghani, Jim Boucher, Felix Karsky, State Board of Trustees, City of i
Hartford, Anthony Amato, Ann Bird,
Defendant-Appellee.
i
The Civil Appeals Management Plan of this court directs that within the (10) days after filing a Notice of i
Appeal, the appellant shall file and serve a Pre-Argument Statement (FORM C), order a transcript of the i
proceedings from the court reporter and file and serve a statement concerning same (FORM D), pay docketing j
fee, and that in the event of default of any of these requirements the Clerk may dismiss the appeal without I
further notice. E
The appellant herein not having so proceeded, upon consideration thereof it is ORDERED that the appeal l
from the order of United States Court for the be, and it hereby is DISMISSED. Any motions
pending prior to the entry of this order of dismissal are deemed MOOT.
` [TIE. NEAINIBATE., CONSISITNG (E5"
ITE nmbw, HAS BEEN rrecnrvm g
( FENIGN( ) S’I`A'I`EMENT OF COS'l`S;!, »
=reestvmeY:___________1>ATEt,;..,5i;
_ ri i :i _ f :1 _ 3; 31 i :1 _ FT;
~- ~·"·*~r r -·-— 7 ` T “ T T?. _;_ :1 — - jj-j;ni:ii?m;.1_;1T1i__1
i :1 _ :1 7 _ :1 i :1 :i _ :1 7 :T1

· · ‘ Case 3:03-cv-00652-PCD Document 65 Fjzgglghg/(1;Q{g.QO5 Page20f
‘ _ · _ •.-.» B.Mac clrmic, _;I· '
OI r g v 4/I@<.
‘ A/L.; 4-4
I : Z: Maftill
_ Deputy rk
I I
I
. I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I