Free Order on Motion for Leave to File - District Court of Connecticut - Connecticut

T Q A Case 3:03-cv-OOGGQDSIWT Document 29 Filed O4/3€@2004 Page 1 of1
“ T
I ,,_
l IETT T
T ‘” T--Im
T ” I ‘ 2 °l A Io: 52 T
T UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT Q',.-i_§_ ._.» . _ T
I I .T.E SST- if c·;>T»—>~— I
T DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT T ` J A my "’ T
T T
T LINDA STURNI ; No.; S;03cTv0sSS (AI/vT)¢é,.,
l "· i T
T T ROCKY HILL BOARD OF EDUcATIoN ; APRIL 2S, TOO4 T
T REQUEST FoR PERMISSION TO FILE OVERL NG BRIEF
T IN REPLY TO THE FLAINTIFF·s 0PPoSIT ON TO T
T MOTION TO DIsIvIIss T ;
The defendant, Rocky Hill Board of Education, hereby rTequests permission to T
file an overlong brief in reply to the plaintiffs opposition to the T:lefendant’s motion to
dismiss. The plaintlff’s 34—page opposition brief contains a deTaiIed, and lengthy
statement of facts. In order to reply to the plaintiffs motion, th defendant must T
incorporate these facts into its memorandum, and address ea h of the plaintlff’s T
factual scenarios in its responsive arguments. _
Furthermore, the plaintiffs reply addresses multiple causes of action and
theories of law. These include:
1. A First Amendment claim, pursuant to 42 U.S.C. ‘lI983; T
2. A claim pursuant to C.G..S. §31-51q; ga.; ge T
3. A retaliation claim pursuant to Section 504 of theTRehabTi|;itaTion;j§ct; =·=¤¤TyT T
4. A claim for common law Defamation; T TT
5. A claim for common law False Light/Invasion of l:Trivacyi`..aljd ._., 5.% .
6. A claim for Wrongful Discharge. ,__T· T J:
QHANTED. IHS
l I `
AIIIIIVI T , U.8.D.J,
oRAL ARGUMENT IS Not REQUESTED QTMBO I pa
iiii
iiii`